Queens20-14

ASUNCoach: Grant Leonard

20-14NET#195

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chris Ashby	1,850	539	77.4%	−2.042	−1.046	+1.044	−0.050	−2.728	−1.166	−1.046	+2.324	+1.868	−1.920	−10.292
Nasir Mann	1,808	581	75.7%	−12.212	−2.238	+10.16	−0.742	−3.222	+0.442	+8.190	+8.02	+3.182	−1.724	−3.068
Yoav Berman	1,754	634	73.4%	+8.482	−0.648	−9.090	−2.724	−2.132	−2.786	+5.680	−5.190	+0.556	+2.082	−2.966
Carson Schwieger	1,440	948	60.3%	+8.380	+4.274	−4.272	+3.886	−1.340	−0.658	−5.722	+0.938	+8.7100	−0.836	−1.056
Avantae Parker	1,284	1,105	53.8%	−5.530	−2.140	+3.430	+0.354	−0.150	+1.130	−0.748	+6.14	+9.1100	−0.640	−9.490
Jordan Watford	1,277	1,111	53.5%	+9.784	+13.298	+3.528	+8.1100	+1.162	−0.456	+5.680	+2.920	−2.724	+1.778	+4.126
Maban Jabriel	1,169	1,220	48.9%	−8.122	−3.334	+4.822	−4.512	+3.280	−0.964	−6.320	−1.566	−5.88	−0.838	+6.914
Gus Larson	678	1,711	28.4%	+8.682	+0.052	−8.588	+1.062	−0.746	+1.722	−3.134	−6.194	−7.94	+3.092	−2.464
Isaiah Henry	338	2,050	14.2%	−13.112	−12.06	+1.142	−7.64	+3.078	+1.426	+0.154	−4.186	−9.02	+1.676	+4.326
Kam Clark	278	2,111	11.6%	−5.230	−7.816	−2.564	−3.320	−0.944	+1.624	−1.046	−7.696	−1.138	−4.06	+20.10

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chris Ashby	1,850	539	77.4%	0.746	118.570	117.826	56.3%68	29.6%50	14.5%60	35.3%54	55.2%32	67.0%38	14.6%38	35.9%40
Nasir Mann	1,808	581	75.7%	-1.842	118.268	120.022	56.1%68	29.4%48	14.8%58	37.6%60	56.7%26	67.4%38	14.7%38	37.5%36
Yoav Berman	1,754	634	73.4%	3.552	118.670	115.032	55.6%66	29.6%50	14.0%64	37.0%60	53.3%40	66.7%38	15.6%46	37.4%36
Carson Schwieger	1,440	948	60.3%	4.654	120.474	115.830	57.8%74	29.7%50	14.5%60	33.3%50	55.1%32	70.2%50	14.8%40	37.8%34
Avantae Parker	1,284	1,105	53.8%	-1.342	117.868	119.124	56.4%70	30.1%52	15.3%54	35.2%54	57.5%22	71.1%54	14.8%40	33.9%44
Jordan Watford	1,277	1,111	53.5%	5.656	124.982	119.224	60.2%82	30.8%52	14.6%60	38.2%62	56.1%28	65.3%30	15.9%48	40.2%28
Maban Jabriel	1,169	1,220	48.9%	-2.940	117.166	119.922	54.1%58	31.7%58	14.3%62	32.4%48	53.9%36	63.8%26	14.7%38	41.6%26
Gus Larson	678	1,711	28.4%	7.258	118.870	111.540	57.1%72	29.7%50	15.9%48	33.3%50	50.4%52	61.3%18	17.2%58	36.6%38
Isaiah Henry	338	2,050	14.2%	-10.130	108.444	118.524	49.8%36	32.8%62	16.0%48	35.6%56	51.2%50	59.0%14	16.4%52	41.9%26
Kam Clark	278	2,111	11.6%	-3.540	111.952	115.330	53.4%54	29.5%48	16.2%46	34.6%54	48.1%64	65.7%32	11.6%20	55.7%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chris Ashby	1,850	539	77.4%	2.750	119.572	116.828	56.3%68	32.3%60	15.6%52	36.3%58	52.9%42	65.2%30	16.6%54	46.1%18
Nasir Mann	1,808	581	75.7%	10.564	120.474	109.944	56.8%70	32.5%60	14.5%60	29.5%40	48.6%62	64.4%28	16.4%52	40.4%28
Yoav Berman	1,754	634	73.4%	-4.938	119.270	124.116	58.3%76	31.7%58	16.7%42	31.4%44	58.4%20	66.2%32	13.6%30	40.3%28
Carson Schwieger	1,440	948	60.3%	-3.840	116.264	120.022	54.0%58	31.0%54	15.1%56	39.0%64	54.2%36	61.5%18	15.5%46	38.8%32
Avantae Parker	1,284	1,105	53.8%	4.252	119.972	115.730	56.2%68	30.2%52	14.1%62	35.9%56	51.4%48	62.0%20	15.4%44	43.3%24
Jordan Watford	1,277	1,111	53.5%	-4.038	111.752	115.730	52.0%50	29.6%50	14.9%56	32.6%48	53.2%40	68.0%40	14.2%34	36.1%38
Maban Jabriel	1,169	1,220	48.9%	5.254	120.474	115.232	58.6%78	28.5%44	15.2%54	38.7%64	55.4%30	69.5%48	15.5%44	34.7%42
Gus Larson	678	1,711	28.4%	-1.342	118.770	120.022	56.0%68	30.4%52	14.3%62	36.4%58	56.5%26	69.1%46	14.2%34	38.9%32
Isaiah Henry	338	2,050	14.2%	3.150	120.474	117.426	57.4%74	29.7%50	14.5%60	35.5%56	55.3%30	68.0%40	14.9%40	37.6%34
Kam Clark	278	2,111	11.6%	1.848	119.672	117.926	56.7%70	30.3%52	14.5%60	35.6%56	55.6%30	66.7%38	15.6%46	35.6%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.