Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
MAAC
Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

16-15NET#218Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #179Coach: Baker Dunleavy
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LVillanova logoLHAWNew Hampshire logoWMaine logoLMassachusetts logoLStony Brook logoWDartmouth logoWLafayette logoLDrexel logoWBethune Cookman logoLStony Brook logoWManhattan logoLRider logoWMonmouth logoWFairfield logoLCanisius logoLNiagara logoWMarist logoWSaint Peter's logoLCanisius logoWNiagara logoWIona logoWRider logoLMarist logoWSiena logoLIona logoWMonmouth logoWSaint Peter's logoLManhattan logoLMonmouth logoLNJIT logo

Team Stats

31 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating2.051
  • Offensive Rating116.467
  • Defensive Rating114.533
  • Pace63.541
  • Effective FG%52.8%74
  • Off Rebound Pct29.8%68
  • Turnover Pct21.1%32
  • FT Attempt Rate37.3%83

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct51.6%53
  • Point Margin / Game1.351
  • Points / Game74.065
  • Points Allowed / Game72.740
  • 1st Half Margin0.548
  • 2nd Half Margin0.853
  • Avg Largest Lead10.237
  • Avg Largest Deficit9.264

Box Score

  • Points / Game74.065
  • Rebounds / Game35.858
  • Assists / Game12.735
  • ORebs / Game10.255
  • DRebs / Game25.659
  • Steals / Game5.114
  • Blocks / Game2.08
  • Turnovers / Game13.435
  • PFs / Game16.972

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.817
  • FGAs / Game55.824
  • Field Goal Pct42.7%25
  • 2PMs / Game12.61
  • 2PAs / Game26.00
  • 2-Point Pct48.5%28
  • 3PMs / Game11.299
  • 3PAs / Game29.899
  • 3-Point Pct37.7%90
  • FTMs / Game15.180
  • FTAs / Game20.873
  • Free Throw Pct72.4%68

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s34.1%1
  • % Pts from 3s45.5%100
  • % Pts from FTs20.4%77
  • Paint Pts / Game18.532
  • % Pts in Paint24.9%29
  • Fast Break Pts / Game4.642
  • % Pts on Fast Break6.2%39
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.740
  • % Pts off TOVs14.4%35
  • 1st Half Pts / Game33.746
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game38.051

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %56.9%78
  • Points / Shot1.3388
  • 3-Point Att Rate53.4%99
  • Assist Pct53.2%59
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.935
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.95x30
  • PF Drawn / Game19.077

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.7%53
  • Opp True Shooting %53.2%70
  • Opp Field Goal Pct44.4%46
  • Opp 2-Point Pct50.1%51
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.5%48
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.9%67
  • Opp FT Att Rate27.0%91
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1979

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game72.740
  • Paint Pts Allowed25.622
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.918
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed12.931
  • Opp Assist Pct45.4%89
  • TOVs Forced / Game10.87

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.7%36
  • Turnovers Forced Pct17.0%10
  • Steal Pct8.1%16
  • Block Pct3.1%7
  • Hakeem Pct11.2%5
  • PF Efficiency0.89x93
  • Steals / PF0.30x19
  • Blocks / PF0.12x12

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #63PM Diff+107
  • #373P%37.7%
  • #59FTAR37.3%
  • #81TS%56.3%
  • #91PO TOV Diff-76
  • #98eFG%52.8%
  • #132OREB%29.8%
  • #145AST%53.2%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #328Opp TOV%15.9%
  • #323SOS-7.0
  • #306Paint Pts %27.6%
  • #298Adj DRtg110.6
  • #251TOV%19.7%
  • #244FB Pts %7.3%
  • #236Opp OREB%29.3%
  • #198Opp 3P%34.5%
Game Log
Loading game log…
C. YoungSr6'6"+1.48564.5%8829.2%9623.55.11.943.7%76.6%
R. KellySo6'1"+1.07263.2%8621.0%7113.22.64.545.7%85.0%
K. MarfoJr6'8"+1.07156.1%6017.6%465.47.50.90.0%63.2%
J. RigoniSo6'6"+0.65359.5%7518.3%5110.33.71.338.2%87.5%
A. BunduSr6'7"+0.54763.3%8614.4%255.55.60.40.0%61.7%
T. AtsonJr6'5"-0.21545.8%1819.6%615.33.40.929.1%69.8%
A. RobinsonSr6'6"-0.31243.7%1511.3%103.42.01.030.1%7.7%
T. WilliamsFr6'3"-0.31150.2%3119.1%588.94.22.436.1%68.5%
T. PickronFr6'3"33.6%716.7%402.10.90.423.0%40.0%
K. AtkinsFr6'0"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. HigginsFr6'1"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Quinnipiac logo25-2619-13#187-1.249107.640108.858-5.426+5461+14634.4%81-437548.8%1434.6%5968.5%15
Quinnipiac logo24-2520-13#197-2.545104.031106.463-5.818+18394-401733.3%77+183448.2%1229.6%476.3%89
Quinnipiac logo23-2424-10#1461.660108.261106.652-5.718+11981-34331.6%72-175751.0%4935.1%6777.5%96
Quinnipiac logo22-2320-12#1511.559106.659105.155-4.025+10479+387632.0%79+272950.2%3936.3%8266.7%10
Quinnipiac logo21-2214-17#214-3.240104.350107.429-2.747+2954+246528.7%51+253150.7%5734.5%6476.5%94
Quinnipiac logo19-2015-15#247-6.030102.551108.414-5.420+5162+749326.9%38+120150.9%6435.7%8476.2%93
Quinnipiac logo18-1916-15#218-4.138106.459110.616-7.09+3659+1079929.8%63+80852.8%7437.7%9072.4%68
Quinnipiac logo17-1812-21#278-9.521103.034112.512-3.329-3930+175927.8%38+701050.3%3833.9%3470.6%41
Quinnipiac logo16-1710-21#285-10.019101.836111.711-1.453+4562-113834.1%89+551647.9%1532.6%1868.3%31
Quinnipiac logo15-169-21#282-10.32093.05103.359-3.530+16491+569038.3%97+84543.1%134.5%4964.4%6
Quinnipiac logo14-1515-15#1680.052102.347102.355-2.539+372100-282642.1%100+130144.0%430.7%1177.3%99
Quinnipiac logo13-1420-12#1382.361111.281108.929-1.250+377100-243342.3%100+127146.8%1435.7%6771.6%67

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
56.3%#78
Effective FG %
52.8%#91
3-Point %
37.7%#35
3PAR
53.4%#4
FTAR
37.3%#57
Assist %
53.2%#144

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
33.3%#236
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
12.1%#7
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

26 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 37.4% of shots at 0.91 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0937.4%0.91Middle (11–20s): 35.2% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0435.2%1.21Late (21s+): 27.4% of shots at 1.07 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9727.4%1.07SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 41.0% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0741.0%0.97Middle (11–20s): 31.4% of shots at 1.05 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0231.4%1.05Late (21s+): 27.7% of shots at 1.02 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9527.7%1.02SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

26 games
Created byFinished by
Rich Kelly → Cameron Young: 23 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 14 from three)Rich Kelly → Jacob Rigoni: 23 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 21 from three)Rich Kelly → Abdulai Bundu: 16 assisted baskets (16 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Rich Kelly → Travis Atson: 10 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 6 from three)Rich Kelly → Tyrese Williams: 15 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 10 from three)Tyrese Williams → Cameron Young: 7 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Tyrese Williams → Jacob Rigoni: 14 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 11 from three)Tyrese Williams → Rich Kelly: 11 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 10 from three)Tyrese Williams → Travis Atson: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Cameron Young → Rich Kelly: 14 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 12 from three)Cameron Young → Abdulai Bundu: 11 assisted baskets (11 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Cameron Young → Travis Atson: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Jacob Rigoni → Cameron Young: 8 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Jacob Rigoni → Rich Kelly: 12 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 12 from three)Kelly87 astWilliams38 astYoung32 astRigoni20 astYoung38 madeRigoni37 madeKelly37 madeBundu27 madeAtson23 madeWilliams15 made
Kelly is the least-assisted finisher — 81% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.