Quinnipiac23-10

MAACCoach: Tom Pecora

23-10NET#158

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Matt Balanc	1,286	148	89.7%	+24.7100	+13.998	−10.992	+6.596	+3.076	−2.582	+2.768	−3.380	−3.620	+3.794	−9.890
Savion Lewis	1,189	245	82.9%	+3.664	−0.150	−3.768	−3.618	−4.616	−3.992	+7.086	+0.050	+1.464	−0.248	−9.490
Paul Otieno	1,086	348	75.7%	+24.2100	+12.096	−12.294	+4.088	+6.494	−2.178	+2.566	−2.978	+4.086	+2.182	−8.186
Alexis Reyes	949	485	66.2%	+10.886	+4.272	−6.680	−0.644	+3.178	−1.266	−0.450	−5.190	−4.216	+0.966	−5.980
Doug Young	445	989	31.0%	−3.638	+2.262	+5.820	+2.778	+2.170	+0.934	−4.726	+2.426	+3.682	−1.232	+10.76
Rihards Vavers	309	1,125	21.6%	−13.712	−0.646	+13.14	+3.886	−4.814	+3.510	+6.684	+6.24	−0.844	−1.626	+3.630
Richie Springs	191	1,242	13.4%	−29.32	−19.82	+9.48	−5.68	−4.018	+5.82	−6.320	+3.516	−0.248	−3.310	−3.670
Daemar Kelly	113	1,321	7.9%	−4.036	−4.328	−0.350	−5.98	−0.052	−2.380	−3.930	−0.756	+1.262	+0.660	+3.430
JJ Riggins	110	1,324	7.7%	−13.212	−3.036	+10.28	−3.618	−7.96	−2.884	+4.276	+0.940	−7.64	+0.254	+19.50

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Matt Balanc	1,286	148	89.7%	12.168	113.260	101.164	51.8%54	37.1%74	17.7%40	32.2%56	48.3%60	67.7%44	18.9%64	26.8%56
Savion Lewis	1,189	245	82.9%	10.164	111.758	101.662	50.6%48	36.0%72	17.3%44	33.1%58	48.6%58	68.3%48	18.4%60	26.2%58
Paul Otieno	1,086	348	75.7%	15.472	114.664	99.368	52.1%56	38.4%80	17.5%42	32.5%58	47.9%62	69.0%50	19.0%64	25.8%58
Alexis Reyes	949	485	66.2%	13.170	113.160	100.066	51.0%50	37.8%78	17.6%42	31.8%56	46.9%66	66.7%38	18.8%62	25.9%58
Doug Young	445	989	31.0%	7.058	113.260	106.250	53.0%60	38.2%78	18.6%34	28.7%46	50.3%48	70.6%56	17.7%56	35.2%32
Rihards Vavers	309	1,125	21.6%	-1.344	111.356	112.534	54.2%64	32.9%58	20.7%22	37.2%68	53.5%34	67.4%44	17.2%52	30.6%44
Richie Springs	191	1,242	13.4%	-15.824	94.520	110.440	46.3%30	33.3%62	23.0%12	26.4%40	51.6%44	67.9%44	15.6%40	24.7%62
Daemar Kelly	113	1,321	7.9%	5.856	107.746	101.962	45.8%26	36.8%74	15.9%54	28.3%46	48.0%62	69.1%50	19.0%64	31.0%42
JJ Riggins	110	1,324	7.7%	-2.842	109.050	111.736	47.9%36	29.5%46	15.4%58	35.8%66	49.4%54	61.0%20	18.6%62	46.0%14

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Matt Balanc	1,286	148	89.7%	-12.726	99.328	112.036	45.3%24	34.1%64	20.3%24	29.5%48	51.5%44	71.3%60	15.1%38	36.6%28
Savion Lewis	1,189	245	82.9%	6.558	111.858	105.352	54.1%64	40.6%84	21.2%20	26.1%38	48.6%58	66.9%42	18.6%62	35.6%30
Paul Otieno	1,086	348	75.7%	-8.832	102.736	111.538	48.2%36	32.0%56	19.6%28	30.0%50	50.8%48	64.9%34	16.9%50	34.0%34
Alexis Reyes	949	485	66.2%	2.350	108.950	106.650	51.6%52	34.7%66	18.8%34	32.2%56	52.0%42	70.9%58	17.9%56	31.8%40
Doug Young	445	989	31.0%	10.764	111.156	100.466	50.3%46	36.1%72	17.7%40	33.4%60	47.9%62	67.0%42	18.9%64	24.6%62
Rihards Vavers	309	1,125	21.6%	12.468	111.958	99.468	50.4%48	37.7%78	17.2%44	30.6%52	47.3%64	68.2%48	18.8%64	27.1%56
Richie Springs	191	1,242	13.4%	13.470	114.464	100.964	51.9%54	37.3%76	17.2%44	32.7%58	48.1%60	68.1%46	18.9%64	28.4%50
Daemar Kelly	113	1,321	7.9%	9.864	112.158	102.360	51.7%54	36.8%74	18.2%38	32.2%56	48.7%58	67.9%46	18.4%60	27.6%54
JJ Riggins	110	1,324	7.7%	10.464	112.058	101.562	51.5%52	37.4%76	18.2%38	31.6%56	48.6%58	68.6%48	18.5%60	26.5%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.