Poss2,181
Net Rtg-16.622
ORtg101.230
DRtg117.824
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,181 | 996 | -16.622 | 101.230 | 117.824 | 45.9%26 | 32.2%56 | 18.8%34 | 30.5%52 | 54.2%32 | 63.5%28 | 19.2%64 | 46.4%14 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IIClouetK. ClouetTrouetS. TrouetDahlkeD. DahlkeDuckettT. Duckett | 159 | 83 | -22.916 | 100.228 | 123.116 | 51.1%48 | 32.5%56 | 22.1%16 | 26.3%38 | 66.0%4 | 66.7%38 | 21.0%76 | 26.4%58 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IITrouetS. TrouetDahlkeD. DahlkePierreB. PierreDuckettT. Duckett | 65 | 33 | -12.228 | 102.934 | 115.130 | 43.7%18 | 32.5%56 | 12.3%80 | 23.8%30 | 59.6%14 | 62.1%24 | 24.2%88 | 36.5%30 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IITrouetS. TrouetBradley Jr.K. Bradley Jr.DahlkeD. DahlkeDuckettT. Duckett | 54 | 26 | -12.726 | 81.86 | 94.578 | 43.0%16 | 14.8%6 | 20.4%24 | 18.6%18 | 42.0%84 | 80.6%92 | 14.5%32 | 43.2%18 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IITrouetS. TrouetBradley Jr.K. Bradley Jr.DahlkeD. DahlkePierreB. Pierre | 53 | 28 | -26.912 | 77.24 | 104.156 | 34.8%4 | 40.5%84 | 28.2%2 | 32.6%58 | 54.1%34 | 71.9%64 | 18.0%56 | 24.5%64 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IITrouetS. TrouetWebbK. WebbMunceyD. MunceyDuckettT. Duckett | 48 | 26 | 0.748 | 91.314 | 90.784 | 38.6%8 | 29.0%42 | 14.5%66 | 29.5%48 | 47.4%66 | 79.2%88 | 21.6%78 | 18.4%82 |
| Jamerson IIS. Jamerson IIClouetK. ClouetTrouetS. TrouetChammaaJ. ChammaaDuckettT. Duckett | 40 | 16 | 71.3100 | 108.848 | 37.598 | 50.0%40 | 36.4%72 | 22.8%14 | 60.0%94 | 15.8%98 | 76.5%82 | 40.3%100 | 63.2%4 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

