Poss2,254
Net Rtg14.772
ORtg119.574
DRtg104.856
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,254 | 1,086 | 14.772 | 119.574 | 104.856 | 56.2%72 | 36.4%72 | 17.5%44 | 28.5%44 | 49.1%56 | 69.9%54 | 17.0%50 | 30.4%46 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilTillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr. | 210 | 107 | 10.364 | 121.178 | 110.840 | 59.3%82 | 32.4%56 | 16.7%48 | 28.4%44 | 55.4%28 | 68.0%46 | 18.8%62 | 20.1%76 |
| TillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.EnsmingerJ. Ensminger | 206 | 108 | 16.074 | 120.776 | 104.756 | 53.0%58 | 40.3%82 | 14.1%68 | 25.4%36 | 47.7%64 | 69.8%54 | 14.0%28 | 26.6%58 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilTillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. Mahi | 162 | 83 | 43.296 | 134.394 | 91.182 | 69.1%98 | 25.8%30 | 14.8%64 | 19.9%20 | 47.7%64 | 85.9%98 | 17.9%56 | 18.0%82 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilTillyC. TillyBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. Mahi | 145 | 71 | 13.770 | 124.282 | 110.540 | 60.7%86 | 29.2%44 | 15.9%56 | 34.7%64 | 46.1%70 | 62.0%22 | 12.5%20 | 21.8%72 |
| TillyC. TillyBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. MahiEnsmingerJ. Ensminger | 110 | 56 | -7.634 | 107.546 | 115.130 | 50.0%40 | 40.7%84 | 23.7%10 | 30.9%52 | 54.7%30 | 74.5%74 | 13.1%22 | 26.3%58 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. MahiTongueC. Tongue | 100 | 46 | 36.894 | 123.682 | 86.888 | 57.5%76 | 34.0%62 | 16.9%46 | 32.2%56 | 38.7%90 | 62.7%26 | 20.5%72 | 20.6%76 |
| BryanT. BryanBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.TongueC. TongueEnsmingerJ. Ensminger | 69 | 35 | 24.884 | 128.388 | 103.558 | 58.7%82 | 30.6%48 | 13.1%76 | 25.4%36 | 46.0%70 | 68.3%46 | 18.8%62 | 38.7%26 |
| BryanT. BryanBalA. BalTongueC. TongueEnsmingerJ. EnsmingerKnapperB. Knapper | 59 | 26 | 49.598 | 124.382 | 74.896 | 63.7%92 | 32.1%56 | 20.4%24 | 19.6%20 | 36.1%94 | 75.0%76 | 20.3%72 | 24.1%66 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilBryanT. BryanStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. MahiTongueC. Tongue | 55 | 27 | -5.438 | 118.972 | 124.414 | 55.3%68 | 37.9%76 | 18.0%40 | 42.6%78 | 56.7%22 | 67.9%44 | 10.5%10 | 32.7%40 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilTillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanBalA. BalKnapperB. Knapper | 54 | 27 | 6.458 | 117.068 | 110.640 | 56.9%74 | 31.0%52 | 16.7%48 | 11.8%6 | 51.0%48 | 54.8%8 | 20.3%72 | 21.2%74 |
| BryanT. BryanMahiE. MahiTongueC. TongueEnsmingerJ. EnsmingerKnapperB. Knapper | 50 | 26 | 9.964 | 96.422 | 86.488 | 43.1%18 | 38.9%78 | 18.1%38 | 15.7%12 | 42.2%84 | 82.8%94 | 15.0%34 | 24.4%64 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilBryanT. BryanBalA. BalStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.TongueC. Tongue | 49 | 27 | -0.146 | 107.846 | 107.948 | 44.0%20 | 50.0%96 | 22.4%14 | 26.0%38 | 55.2%28 | 67.9%44 | 20.8%74 | 12.5%92 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilBryanT. BryanMahiE. MahiTongueC. TongueKnapperB. Knapper | 48 | 25 | 35.592 | 120.476 | 84.990 | 55.7%70 | 39.3%80 | 18.7%34 | 29.5%48 | 40.4%88 | 74.3%74 | 19.3%66 | 17.0%86 |
| TillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanStewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.MahiE. MahiEnsmingerJ. Ensminger | 47 | 23 | -10.930 | 98.626 | 109.544 | 50.0%40 | 25.9%30 | 21.4%18 | 37.8%70 | 46.7%68 | 74.2%74 | 11.5%14 | 37.0%30 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilBryanT. BryanBalA. BalTongueC. TongueKnapperB. Knapper | 46 | 21 | -25.114 | 91.714 | 116.826 | 41.1%12 | 32.3%56 | 15.3%60 | 17.8%16 | 58.0%18 | 75.0%76 | 14.3%30 | 18.2%82 |
| TillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanBalA. BalEnsmingerJ. EnsmingerKnapperB. Knapper | 41 | 19 | 15.272 | 122.280 | 107.150 | 60.5%86 | 22.2%20 | 12.2%80 | 10.5%6 | 61.7%10 | 73.7%72 | 22.9%84 | 36.7%30 |
| O'NeilJ. O'NeilTillyC. TillyBryanT. BryanMahiE. MahiKnapperB. Knapper | 36 | 16 | 4.756 | 103.836 | 99.170 | 46.2%26 | 44.4%92 | 30.9%0 | 53.8%90 | 48.3%62 | 77.8%84 | 17.5%52 | 24.1%66 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

