Seattle22-14

WACCoach: Chris Victor

22-14NET#102

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Schumacher	1,759	480	78.6%	−7.624	−3.334	+4.426	−1.634	−3.622	−0.862	−0.648	+3.020	−2.132	+0.966	+0.048
Cameron Tyson	1,657	582	74.0%	+18.396	+19.3100	+1.044	+6.998	+4.386	−5.696	−4.826	+0.148	+2.876	−2.616	−7.184
Kobe Williamson	1,334	905	59.6%	−16.78	−8.314	+8.412	−3.618	−3.126	−0.352	−11.26	+3.120	−2.726	−0.838	−0.954
Brandton Chatfield	1,314	926	58.7%	+8.480	+7.184	−1.456	+3.786	+0.354	−2.278	−7.616	+0.148	+0.758	+0.458	−8.286
John Christofilis	1,269	970	56.7%	−3.040	−1.742	+1.342	+0.860	−5.910	−1.976	−9.012	+0.444	−0.546	−0.544	−1.054
Paris Dawson	1,240	1,000	55.4%	−3.936	−2.636	+1.342	−3.022	+4.486	+2.020	+4.174	−0.556	−1.240	+1.270	+7.812
Seyi Reiley	1,121	1,119	50.0%	+3.966	+1.056	−2.964	−1.140	+4.988	+1.822	+10.394	−0.958	+1.262	+0.964	+4.724
Vasja Pandza	647	1,592	28.9%	+1.456	−3.832	−5.176	+0.354	−2.728	+1.922	+3.772	−0.252	+3.884	+1.370	−3.568
Viktor Rajkovic	426	1,814	19.0%	−3.438	−8.414	−5.074	−2.030	−7.36	+0.442	+0.252	−1.464	+1.264	−1.628	−8.588
Malek Gomma	229	2,010	10.2%	+9.382	+5.578	−3.868	+4.992	+4.586	+4.94	+18.7100	−4.586	−0.348	−1.034	+15.32
Matthew Levis	165	2,074	7.4%	+2.358	−3.434	−5.676	−5.210	+4.988	−0.656	+14.498	−6.494	−2.032	+1.068	+20.70

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Schumacher	1,759	480	78.6%	6.458	107.446	101.064	50.5%48	32.4%58	18.5%36	34.0%62	47.3%64	70.6%56	17.8%56	36.8%28
Cameron Tyson	1,657	582	74.0%	12.868	113.160	100.366	52.6%58	34.3%64	17.3%44	33.0%58	46.6%68	71.7%62	16.9%50	34.9%32
Kobe Williamson	1,334	905	59.6%	1.348	104.740	103.458	49.5%42	31.9%56	18.6%36	29.7%50	47.8%62	69.9%54	17.2%52	36.4%28
Brandton Chatfield	1,314	926	58.7%	11.566	111.056	99.568	52.4%56	33.3%58	17.8%40	31.1%54	46.7%68	71.3%60	17.7%56	33.4%34
John Christofilis	1,269	970	56.7%	6.758	107.346	100.664	51.2%50	30.6%50	17.9%40	30.3%52	46.8%66	70.8%58	17.4%52	36.3%28
Paris Dawson	1,240	1,000	55.4%	6.358	106.946	100.664	49.6%42	35.0%68	19.6%28	36.0%66	46.4%68	70.5%56	18.1%58	40.3%22
Seyi Reiley	1,121	1,119	50.0%	10.064	108.650	98.670	50.3%46	35.6%70	19.6%28	39.4%72	46.2%68	71.6%62	18.0%58	39.2%22
Vasja Pandza	647	1,592	28.9%	9.062	105.442	96.474	51.1%50	31.2%52	20.1%26	36.8%68	46.5%68	73.8%72	18.5%60	34.2%34
Viktor Rajkovic	426	1,814	19.0%	5.356	101.332	96.074	49.3%40	27.2%36	19.0%32	34.3%62	45.5%72	72.0%64	16.3%46	29.9%46
Malek Gomma	229	2,010	10.2%	16.374	113.060	96.774	55.3%70	37.2%76	23.1%12	51.1%88	42.6%82	70.7%58	16.7%48	50.5%10
Matthew Levis	165	2,074	7.4%	10.164	105.040	94.976	46.1%28	37.6%78	18.2%38	47.5%84	40.7%86	69.2%50	18.5%60	56.0%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Schumacher	1,759	480	78.6%	14.070	110.654	96.674	52.2%56	36.0%72	19.4%30	34.6%62	44.2%76	72.7%66	16.8%50	36.8%28
Cameron Tyson	1,657	582	74.0%	-5.538	93.818	99.368	45.7%26	30.0%48	22.8%14	37.8%70	46.5%68	69.0%50	19.5%68	42.1%18
Kobe Williamson	1,334	905	59.6%	18.076	113.060	95.076	53.1%60	35.0%68	18.9%34	40.9%76	44.7%76	72.6%66	18.1%58	37.3%26
Brandton Chatfield	1,314	926	58.7%	3.152	103.938	100.964	48.7%38	33.0%58	20.0%26	38.7%72	46.5%68	70.6%58	17.3%52	41.6%20
John Christofilis	1,269	970	56.7%	9.764	109.150	99.368	50.4%48	36.5%72	19.8%28	39.3%72	46.4%68	71.3%60	17.9%56	37.3%26
Paris Dawson	1,240	1,000	55.4%	10.264	109.552	99.368	52.5%58	30.6%50	17.6%42	31.9%56	46.9%66	71.7%62	16.9%50	32.5%38
Seyi Reiley	1,121	1,119	50.0%	6.158	107.646	101.562	51.4%52	30.7%50	17.8%40	29.1%48	47.0%66	70.4%56	17.1%52	34.5%32
Vasja Pandza	647	1,592	28.9%	7.760	109.250	101.562	50.8%48	33.9%64	18.2%38	33.1%58	46.7%68	70.0%54	17.2%52	37.7%26
Viktor Rajkovic	426	1,814	19.0%	8.662	109.752	101.064	51.3%50	34.5%66	18.6%34	34.1%62	46.9%66	70.8%58	17.9%56	38.5%24
Malek Gomma	229	2,010	10.2%	7.058	107.546	100.564	50.4%48	32.7%58	18.2%38	32.4%58	47.1%64	71.1%60	17.7%56	35.2%32
Matthew Levis	165	2,074	7.4%	7.860	108.348	100.564	51.3%50	32.8%58	18.8%34	33.1%58	47.1%66	71.2%60	17.5%54	35.3%30

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.