Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
South Carolina logoSouth Carolina logoSouth Carolina logoSouth Carolina logo

South Carolina12-20

SECCoach: Lamont Paris

12-20NET#83

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Collin Murray-Boyles+16.596+7.184−9.490+8.3100+2.474+3.58−4.826−2.374+3.180+3.494−9.992
Jacobi Wright−5.032−6.022−1.054−2.624+2.978+1.726−3.532−2.676−1.734−1.134+3.728
Zach Davis−2.840+1.560+4.326+2.072−3.820+0.738+6.184+2.822−3.320+0.356−3.668
Jamarii Thomas+0.954+3.570+2.634+1.366−1.834−2.382+8.690+3.020+2.272+1.474+1.740
Nick Pringle−1.544−6.420−5.076−3.518+2.474+1.724−5.920−1.464+2.474−1.230−5.478
Morris Ugusuk+0.352+4.374+4.028+1.970−3.918−4.496−1.046+1.038−0.050−0.838+9.68
Myles Stute+19.998+9.994−10.092+5.092+3.078−1.470−3.332−6.094+1.364+0.358−1.860
Arden Conyers−22.04−13.56+8.512−7.84+3.984+4.14−7.116+5.46−3.420+0.662−0.352
Cam Scott+4.368+0.052−4.372−2.624−4.116−1.472+9.092−2.374+2.374−0.444+1.242
Benjamin Bosmans-Verdonk−10.618−0.448+10.28−2.426+4.084−1.064−3.432+4.98+3.080−1.920+1.838
Jordan Butler−2.740−0.250+2.536−1.238−4.416−1.672+4.678−2.778−7.64−1.330+2.436

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Collin Murray-Boyles0.848105.640104.85650.8%4632.5%5619.5%2841.7%7651.0%4872.9%6816.8%4827.9%54
Jacobi Wright-4.740102.234106.95048.0%3232.6%5819.1%3241.9%7850.9%5071.8%6215.7%4031.4%44
Zach Davis-4.240104.438108.64649.4%4030.5%4818.9%3445.0%8252.5%4071.0%6016.0%4229.2%50
Jamarii Thomas-3.042105.140108.14849.2%3831.2%5217.8%4046.0%8252.6%4073.0%6816.4%4431.0%44
Nick Pringle-3.940101.332105.25447.3%3032.8%5819.3%3040.5%7451.0%4873.1%7015.5%3828.3%52
Morris Ugusuk-3.242105.740108.94449.5%4030.2%4816.7%4842.4%7852.0%4472.2%6415.6%3834.7%34
Myles Stute11.466111.15499.86852.4%5434.1%6417.6%4240.4%7447.2%6673.1%7016.2%4429.0%50
Arden Conyers-19.91893.618113.63442.8%1634.7%6621.7%1837.5%6855.7%2669.5%5216.4%4430.2%46
Cam Scott0.246103.936103.75846.5%2828.6%4217.5%4450.2%8849.7%5674.0%7415.6%4031.4%44
Benjamin Bosmans-Verdonk-12.028103.536115.62846.7%2835.0%6617.8%4040.1%7455.6%2674.7%7414.3%3031.9%42
Jordan Butler-5.638103.736109.24447.7%3228.1%4017.3%4446.7%8449.3%5665.9%3814.8%3432.4%40

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Collin Murray-Boyles-15.72298.526114.23242.5%1630.1%4816.0%5446.4%8453.3%3669.8%5413.4%2437.8%28
Jacobi Wright0.348108.248107.94850.6%4629.7%4617.4%4445.4%8253.5%3673.4%7016.7%4627.7%54
Zach Davis-1.544102.834104.35647.4%3034.2%6418.2%3838.9%7249.7%5674.3%7415.7%4032.8%40
Jamarii Thomas-3.940101.632105.55447.8%3233.0%5820.1%2437.4%6849.7%5670.8%5815.0%3429.3%50
Nick Pringle-2.542107.746110.24250.8%4630.4%4817.6%4246.5%8452.4%4070.7%5816.7%4633.7%38
Morris Ugusuk-3.542101.432104.95447.6%3234.1%6421.1%2043.4%8051.0%4872.2%6416.4%4425.1%62
Myles Stute-8.532101.332109.84247.3%3031.0%5219.0%3243.8%8053.2%3871.8%6415.9%4030.9%44
Arden Conyers2.050107.144105.15450.6%4630.8%5017.6%4244.6%8250.3%5073.0%6815.8%4030.4%46
Cam Scott-4.240103.836108.04849.2%3832.7%5818.9%3241.2%7652.0%4471.7%6216.0%4230.1%46
Benjamin Bosmans-Verdonk-1.544103.936105.45449.1%3831.1%5218.8%3443.5%8050.7%5071.7%6216.3%4430.1%46
Jordan Butler-2.942103.936106.85048.9%3832.5%5618.9%3442.2%7852.0%4473.4%7016.1%4230.0%48
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.