South Carolina13-19

SECCoach: Lamont Paris

13-19NET#105

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Meechie Johnson	1,690	468	78.3%	+0.854	−3.632	−4.574	−2.426	−11.12	−3.592	+1.762	+0.446	+0.152	+0.968	−8.890
Kobe Knox	1,623	536	75.2%	−7.224	−5.822	+1.540	−1.634	−3.918	+1.032	+7.888	+3.516	+0.860	+2.992	+2.136
Mike Sharavjamts	1,597	562	74.0%	−3.338	−3.334	+0.050	−1.238	−1.140	+2.614	+2.062	−2.374	+1.970	−2.910	+2.436
Eli Ellis	1,251	908	58.0%	+3.164	+7.988	+4.822	+4.188	−0.746	−2.686	+5.982	+1.630	−0.644	−0.050	+8.312
Myles Stute	1,066	1,093	49.4%	−4.234	−0.846	+3.430	+0.252	−0.844	+1.132	−3.830	+1.236	−4.414	+0.152	−2.564
Elijah Strong	921	1,238	42.7%	−0.350	+6.082	+6.316	+2.678	−3.322	−3.190	−2.140	+0.938	−3.818	−1.328	−3.770
Grant Polk	640	1,518	29.7%	+1.958	+1.358	−0.652	−0.346	+5.090	−0.760	−4.826	−1.566	+1.464	−0.248	+1.540
EJ Walker	580	1,578	26.9%	−15.78	−9.212	+6.416	−4.314	−0.250	+0.638	−4.926	+5.46	−0.446	+1.880	+2.634
Nordin Kapic	376	1,782	17.4%	−1.046	−8.314	−7.386	−3.618	−1.438	+0.934	+2.666	−2.978	+2.980	−0.346	−4.976
Hayden Assemian	368	1,791	17.0%	+17.596	+10.894	−6.784	+7.798	+2.574	+1.132	−8.412	−4.588	−3.818	+1.170	−2.364
Jordan Butler	354	1,805	16.4%	+10.588	+6.884	−3.870	+0.658	+11.1100	+0.442	+0.354	−0.656	+2.980	+0.662	−5.376
Christ Essandoko	264	1,894	12.2%	+7.678	−8.214	−15.898	−5.010	+10.0100	+7.80	+4.978	−4.790	+13.4100	−1.822	+5.918

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Meechie Johnson	1,690	468	78.3%	-2.940	107.842	110.742	49.4%36	24.7%28	13.6%66	37.6%60	51.9%46	67.8%40	14.9%40	32.3%48
Kobe Knox	1,623	536	75.2%	-4.938	107.240	112.038	49.6%36	26.1%34	14.6%60	39.3%64	52.7%42	68.0%40	15.4%44	34.8%42
Mike Sharavjamts	1,597	562	74.0%	-3.940	107.742	111.640	49.7%36	26.8%38	15.0%56	37.8%60	51.2%50	68.2%42	13.9%34	34.8%42
Eli Ellis	1,251	908	58.0%	-1.842	111.952	113.634	51.7%48	26.8%38	13.3%68	39.7%66	52.5%44	67.5%38	14.6%38	37.8%34
Myles Stute	1,066	1,093	49.4%	-5.236	108.244	113.436	50.1%42	26.6%36	14.9%56	35.3%56	52.4%44	65.5%32	14.7%38	33.0%46
Elijah Strong	921	1,238	42.7%	-3.240	112.154	115.330	51.5%46	25.1%32	12.6%72	36.1%58	52.3%44	65.6%32	13.9%34	32.1%48
Grant Polk	640	1,518	29.7%	-1.742	109.548	111.240	49.7%36	30.6%52	13.9%64	33.9%52	50.7%52	68.7%44	14.5%38	35.3%40
EJ Walker	580	1,578	26.9%	-14.524	101.830	116.328	46.9%26	26.9%38	14.8%58	33.7%52	55.8%30	67.4%38	16.0%48	36.2%38
Nordin Kapic	376	1,782	17.4%	-3.938	101.730	105.754	47.0%26	25.9%34	15.1%54	39.4%64	49.4%58	70.1%50	14.4%36	30.2%54
Hayden Assemian	368	1,791	17.0%	11.466	117.566	106.152	56.3%68	29.1%46	15.2%54	30.3%42	48.1%64	64.7%28	15.6%46	32.3%48
Jordan Butler	354	1,805	16.4%	5.756	114.260	108.548	50.5%42	36.3%74	14.7%58	37.5%60	51.3%48	70.2%50	15.2%42	29.8%56
Christ Essandoko	264	1,894	12.2%	3.752	101.428	97.772	45.6%22	35.8%72	21.2%16	41.6%68	47.7%66	79.5%86	13.1%28	39.4%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Meechie Johnson	1,690	468	78.3%	-3.740	111.452	115.132	51.9%48	35.8%72	17.1%40	35.9%56	51.5%48	67.6%38	13.9%34	41.1%28
Kobe Knox	1,623	536	75.2%	2.450	112.956	110.542	51.2%44	30.0%50	13.6%66	31.5%46	49.2%58	67.1%38	12.5%24	32.7%46
Mike Sharavjamts	1,597	562	74.0%	-0.644	111.050	111.640	50.8%42	27.9%42	12.5%74	35.8%56	53.5%38	66.3%32	16.8%56	32.4%48
Eli Ellis	1,251	908	58.0%	-4.938	104.034	108.946	47.6%30	27.5%40	15.9%48	33.9%52	50.9%50	68.1%40	14.7%38	29.5%56
Myles Stute	1,066	1,093	49.4%	-1.044	109.046	109.944	49.9%36	27.5%40	13.8%66	39.1%64	51.2%50	69.9%48	14.6%38	35.5%40
Elijah Strong	921	1,238	42.7%	-2.940	106.038	108.946	48.8%34	28.4%44	15.7%50	38.1%62	51.4%48	69.4%46	15.2%44	35.9%40
Grant Polk	640	1,518	29.7%	-3.640	108.244	111.840	50.1%42	25.6%32	14.6%60	38.7%64	52.2%44	67.3%38	14.7%40	33.8%44
EJ Walker	580	1,578	26.9%	1.248	111.152	109.944	51.1%44	27.1%38	14.2%62	38.6%62	50.4%52	67.9%40	14.2%34	33.5%44
Nordin Kapic	376	1,782	17.4%	-2.940	110.048	112.936	50.6%42	27.3%40	14.2%62	36.8%58	52.3%44	67.2%38	14.7%38	35.1%40
Hayden Assemian	368	1,791	17.0%	-6.036	106.840	112.836	48.6%34	26.7%36	14.2%62	38.7%64	52.6%42	68.5%42	14.5%38	34.6%42
Jordan Butler	354	1,805	16.4%	-4.838	107.542	112.338	49.9%36	25.2%32	14.3%62	37.2%60	51.9%46	67.3%38	14.6%38	35.1%42
Christ Essandoko	264	1,894	12.2%	-4.038	109.648	113.536	50.6%42	25.8%34	13.4%68	36.7%58	52.3%44	66.1%32	14.9%40	33.6%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

South CarolinaS. Carolina13-19

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

South Carolina13-19