Tennessee Tech7-21

OVCCoach: John Pelphrey

7-21NET#336

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jayvis Harvey	1,300	374	77.7%	+10.384	+9.692	−0.652	+3.282	+3.178	−0.556	+5.982	−2.776	−2.628	−1.528	−4.472
Josiah Davis	1,252	422	74.8%	−11.316	−3.632	+7.714	−2.228	+0.658	−0.862	−4.626	+2.624	−2.826	−0.346	+1.440
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,108	565	66.2%	+10.986	+5.880	−5.074	+1.364	+1.968	−1.772	+2.464	−1.464	+3.480	+0.560	+3.332
Rodney Johnson Jr.	993	680	59.4%	+15.894	+4.674	−11.292	+0.252	+4.384	−0.352	+3.672	−7.896	−0.050	+0.254	+4.724
Diante Wood	931	743	55.6%	−1.046	−4.726	−3.768	−1.932	−0.648	+2.516	+5.882	+0.642	+3.178	+1.066	−8.386
Kyle Layton	928	746	55.4%	+6.374	+4.272	−2.160	+1.262	+1.160	−0.352	+2.566	+0.940	+0.454	+2.384	+0.248
David Early	704	969	42.1%	−12.614	−4.528	+8.112	−2.426	−2.928	−0.860	+1.158	+2.228	−2.528	−2.120	+2.634
Rylee Samons	432	1,241	25.8%	−3.538	+6.380	+9.78	+3.686	−0.648	−0.454	−3.930	+3.716	−1.834	−0.936	+4.724
Bogdan Zimonjic	215	1,458	12.8%	+9.682	−1.642	−11.292	+2.576	−2.430	+1.922	−7.616	−1.262	+1.666	+4.998	−7.684
Grant Strong	190	1,484	11.3%	−24.24	−13.06	+11.36	−2.030	−4.616	+1.922	−9.210	+5.08	+2.372	−4.16	+6.020
David Craig	172	1,501	10.3%	−12.614	−15.84	−3.266	−6.86	−5.212	−1.772	−5.224	−2.776	+4.788	−4.46	−6.482
Jerome Beya	128	1,545	7.7%	−9.920	−1.542	+8.412	+2.678	−1.340	−0.454	−13.44	+6.84	−7.36	+3.190	−1.960

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jayvis Harvey	1,300	374	77.7%	-9.730	101.232	110.938	50.6%48	23.6%22	18.2%38	30.8%52	51.2%46	68.9%50	15.0%38	23.3%68
Josiah Davis	1,252	422	74.8%	-14.824	98.126	113.034	49.3%42	23.0%22	18.1%38	28.3%46	52.5%40	68.7%48	15.3%38	24.6%62
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,108	565	66.2%	-8.432	101.032	109.442	50.3%46	23.5%22	17.8%40	30.3%52	51.3%44	70.5%56	15.5%40	25.4%60
Rodney Johnson Jr.	993	680	59.4%	-5.438	100.932	106.350	49.9%42	24.7%26	18.2%38	30.9%54	48.5%58	69.4%52	15.5%40	26.2%58
Diante Wood	931	743	55.6%	-12.528	96.924	109.442	49.0%40	22.6%20	19.5%30	32.1%56	52.1%42	70.8%58	15.8%42	20.6%76
Kyle Layton	928	746	55.4%	-9.232	100.932	110.140	50.4%46	23.4%22	18.2%38	30.6%52	52.2%40	69.6%52	16.4%46	24.4%64
David Early	704	969	42.1%	-19.320	96.424	115.728	48.4%38	21.2%16	17.9%40	30.1%50	53.1%36	68.0%46	14.2%30	25.8%58
Rylee Samons	432	1,241	25.8%	-14.624	103.738	118.322	52.5%56	22.5%20	18.0%38	26.5%40	54.5%30	68.0%46	14.7%34	27.8%52
Bogdan Zimonjic	215	1,458	12.8%	-3.640	97.724	101.364	52.0%54	20.8%16	20.0%26	22.9%30	50.8%48	70.8%58	19.6%68	17.6%84
Grant Strong	190	1,484	11.3%	-33.58	87.512	121.018	48.1%36	18.8%12	20.0%26	21.3%24	56.2%24	71.4%60	11.8%18	29.6%46
David Craig	172	1,501	10.3%	-23.316	84.810	108.246	43.8%20	18.3%10	16.9%46	24.8%34	49.4%54	73.5%70	11.4%16	18.6%82
Jerome Beya	128	1,545	7.7%	-21.118	97.624	118.722	52.3%56	21.7%18	18.0%40	17.1%14	58.1%18	62.7%24	18.2%58	22.6%70

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jayvis Harvey	1,300	374	77.7%	-20.018	91.516	111.538	47.4%34	20.5%14	18.7%34	24.9%36	54.0%32	71.4%60	16.6%48	27.7%54
Josiah Davis	1,252	422	74.8%	-3.540	101.734	105.354	51.5%52	22.4%20	19.0%32	32.9%58	49.9%54	71.5%62	15.6%42	23.2%68
Daniel Egbuniwe	1,108	565	66.2%	-19.220	95.220	114.430	49.0%40	21.6%18	19.5%30	27.9%44	52.7%38	67.1%42	15.1%38	22.1%72
Rodney Johnson Jr.	993	680	59.4%	-21.318	96.322	117.624	49.7%42	20.4%14	18.5%36	27.3%42	56.4%22	69.4%52	15.3%38	21.6%72
Diante Wood	931	743	55.6%	-11.428	101.632	113.134	50.9%48	23.2%22	17.0%46	26.3%38	51.5%44	67.7%44	14.8%36	28.9%48
Kyle Layton	928	746	55.4%	-15.524	96.724	112.236	49.2%40	22.3%20	18.5%36	28.1%44	51.3%46	69.2%50	14.1%30	24.2%64
David Early	704	969	42.1%	-6.736	100.932	107.646	50.9%48	24.1%24	18.7%34	29.0%48	50.9%48	70.4%56	16.3%46	23.2%68
Rylee Samons	432	1,241	25.8%	-11.128	97.424	108.544	48.9%40	23.0%22	18.4%36	30.5%52	50.9%46	69.9%54	15.6%40	23.1%68
Bogdan Zimonjic	215	1,458	12.8%	-13.326	99.228	112.534	49.5%42	23.2%22	18.1%38	30.4%52	52.0%42	69.2%50	14.8%34	25.3%60
Grant Strong	190	1,484	11.3%	-9.332	100.530	109.842	50.1%46	23.4%22	18.1%38	30.5%52	51.3%46	69.2%50	15.8%42	23.6%66
David Craig	172	1,501	10.3%	-10.730	100.630	111.438	50.6%48	23.5%22	18.5%36	30.0%50	52.1%40	68.9%50	15.9%42	25.0%62
Jerome Beya	128	1,545	7.7%	-11.228	99.128	110.340	49.6%42	23.0%22	18.4%36	30.5%52	51.3%46	69.9%54	15.1%38	24.4%64

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Tennessee TechTenn. Tech7-21

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Tennessee Tech7-21