Texas Tech23-11

Big 12Coach: Grant McCasland

23-11NET#30

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Toussaint	1,831	348	84.0%	+8.480	+3.066	−5.476	−1.734	−2.530	−3.790	+5.280	−1.666	+3.984	−0.248	+0.744
Pop Isaacs	1,802	377	82.7%	+6.072	+2.362	−3.768	+0.254	+1.968	−1.572	−1.444	−3.884	−6.86	+0.966	−2.864
Darrion Williams	1,703	476	78.1%	+12.488	+8.186	−4.372	+2.172	+0.456	−3.792	−3.730	−4.086	−1.636	−0.150	+3.928
Chance McMillian	1,484	694	68.1%	+2.258	+10.994	+8.610	+3.182	−2.132	−3.892	+12.096	+2.722	+0.152	−2.120	+4.226
Kerwin Walton	1,287	892	59.1%	−7.326	−2.638	+4.726	+1.162	−1.042	+1.328	−8.214	+3.120	+2.474	−0.150	+5.720
Warren Washington	1,063	1,116	48.8%	+14.092	+8.688	−5.476	+2.678	+1.968	−2.482	−3.234	+0.346	+4.086	+1.068	−13.396
Robert Jennings II	598	1,581	27.4%	−10.318	−10.710	−0.452	−5.38	+0.960	+1.724	−9.910	+0.840	+3.682	−1.924	−1.658
Lamar Washington	432	1,747	19.8%	−3.538	−3.632	−0.150	+1.162	+4.786	+6.80	+11.996	+0.940	−0.348	+2.180	−4.070
Devan Cambridge	333	1,846	15.3%	+4.668	−0.846	−5.476	−3.120	+2.574	−1.368	−4.228	−1.464	−3.818	+3.994	+1.342
Eemeli Yalaho	239	1,940	11.0%	−22.84	−17.92	+4.924	−2.130	−5.112	+7.70	+10.394	+0.444	−2.232	−1.134	+7.614

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Toussaint	1,831	348	84.0%	9.864	114.364	104.556	52.1%56	33.0%58	16.4%50	35.1%64	48.9%56	68.0%46	17.3%52	27.0%56
Pop Isaacs	1,802	377	82.7%	9.564	114.264	104.754	52.5%56	33.7%64	16.8%48	34.1%62	48.5%58	66.2%38	17.5%54	26.4%58
Darrion Williams	1,703	476	78.1%	11.166	115.666	104.556	52.8%58	33.5%62	16.2%52	33.5%60	48.3%60	67.0%42	17.4%52	27.7%54
Chance McMillian	1,484	694	68.1%	9.262	117.370	108.146	53.4%62	32.7%58	15.8%54	38.2%70	50.0%54	67.4%42	16.7%48	28.2%52
Kerwin Walton	1,287	892	59.1%	5.556	112.860	107.348	52.9%58	33.0%58	17.6%42	31.0%54	50.5%48	68.4%48	17.3%52	29.3%48
Warren Washington	1,063	1,116	48.8%	15.672	118.272	102.660	53.7%62	34.3%64	15.8%54	32.7%58	49.3%54	69.4%52	17.9%56	20.1%76
Robert Jennings II	598	1,581	27.4%	1.048	106.044	105.154	48.6%38	34.0%64	18.2%38	27.2%42	49.7%54	70.0%54	16.0%44	25.7%60
Lamar Washington	432	1,747	19.8%	5.756	110.954	105.352	53.4%60	37.2%76	22.5%14	44.0%80	49.9%54	67.1%42	19.0%64	23.6%66
Devan Cambridge	333	1,846	15.3%	12.468	113.160	100.864	49.8%42	35.5%70	15.9%54	30.8%52	47.9%62	64.1%30	20.6%74	27.9%52
Eemeli Yalaho	239	1,940	11.0%	-11.928	97.926	109.842	50.6%48	28.8%42	23.8%10	43.6%80	49.5%54	65.4%36	16.4%46	33.6%34

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joe Toussaint	1,831	348	84.0%	1.448	111.356	109.942	53.8%64	35.5%70	20.1%24	29.9%50	50.4%48	64.1%30	17.5%54	26.3%58
Pop Isaacs	1,802	377	82.7%	3.552	111.958	108.446	52.2%56	31.8%54	18.3%38	35.4%64	52.3%40	73.1%68	16.6%48	29.2%48
Darrion Williams	1,703	476	78.1%	-1.344	107.546	108.844	50.8%48	33.1%58	19.9%26	37.2%68	52.3%40	68.7%48	17.4%54	23.8%66
Chance McMillian	1,484	694	68.1%	7.058	106.444	99.468	50.3%46	34.8%66	19.6%28	26.2%38	47.3%64	67.3%42	18.8%62	24.0%66
Kerwin Walton	1,287	892	59.1%	12.768	115.366	102.660	51.8%54	34.0%64	16.3%52	39.1%72	47.3%64	66.0%36	17.4%54	23.6%66
Warren Washington	1,063	1,116	48.8%	1.650	109.652	108.046	51.1%50	32.5%58	18.2%38	35.9%66	49.0%56	65.4%36	16.9%50	33.4%34
Robert Jennings II	598	1,581	27.4%	11.366	116.870	105.552	53.9%64	33.1%58	16.6%48	37.1%68	48.9%56	66.4%38	17.9%56	27.3%54
Lamar Washington	432	1,747	19.8%	9.162	114.564	105.452	52.2%56	32.5%58	15.7%56	32.1%56	49.0%56	67.4%44	17.0%50	27.6%54
Devan Cambridge	333	1,846	15.3%	7.860	113.962	106.250	52.9%58	33.0%58	17.2%44	35.0%64	49.4%54	68.0%46	16.8%48	26.7%56
Eemeli Yalaho	239	1,940	11.0%	10.966	115.866	104.854	52.6%58	33.9%64	16.2%52	33.3%58	49.1%56	67.6%44	17.5%54	26.0%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.