Texas Tech28-9

Big 12Coach: Grant McCasland

28-9NET#9

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Hawkins	1,779	624	74.0%	−13.712	−11.88	+1.938	−5.58	−5.012	−1.166	−5.024	−0.048	−0.744	−0.642	+4.226
Christian Anderson	1,703	699	70.9%	−5.132	−0.548	+4.626	−2.822	−2.528	−2.382	+10.794	+3.416	+1.466	+0.560	−0.150
Darrion Williams	1,636	766	68.1%	+8.882	+10.194	+1.242	+5.796	−2.528	−2.684	−3.432	+1.236	−1.636	−0.246	−5.678
Chance McMillian	1,631	772	67.9%	+13.592	+10.994	−2.664	+5.796	+2.070	−0.556	−1.344	−2.172	−3.320	−0.150	−7.184
JT Toppin	1,426	976	59.4%	−0.946	+2.866	+3.828	−1.040	+0.656	−3.892	−2.934	+1.928	+2.272	−1.724	+6.118
Kevin Overton	1,275	1,127	53.1%	+3.564	−1.742	−5.376	−1.336	+4.486	+3.48	+3.572	−3.282	+1.566	+0.966	−0.150
Kerwin Walton	1,093	1,309	45.5%	−11.216	−3.432	+7.812	−2.328	−1.440	−1.470	+3.572	+5.46	+2.778	−1.626	+3.330
Federiko Federiko	1,057	1,345	44.0%	+2.662	−6.718	−9.390	−2.526	+1.566	+3.48	+0.052	−3.784	+2.878	+1.272	−7.786
Devan Cambridge	172	2,230	7.2%	+30.5100	+7.786	−22.898	+6.998	−0.448	−0.760	−15.42	−8.498	−2.526	+11.2100	−1.358
Eemeli Yalaho	142	2,261	5.9%	−2.442	+3.872	+6.218	+8.6100	+0.252	+6.30	+1.662	−4.588	−13.32	−1.134	+4.126

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Hawkins	1,779	624	74.0%	14.470	118.472	104.058	53.4%60	34.9%66	14.3%68	28.0%44	48.0%62	68.4%48	17.7%54	34.7%36
Christian Anderson	1,703	699	70.9%	16.574	121.378	104.856	54.0%62	35.4%68	13.9%70	32.5%58	49.0%58	69.1%50	18.0%56	33.5%38
Darrion Williams	1,636	766	68.1%	20.780	124.684	103.958	56.6%74	35.2%68	13.8%70	28.2%44	48.4%60	68.1%46	17.7%54	31.8%42
Chance McMillian	1,631	772	67.9%	22.382	124.984	102.760	56.6%74	36.7%72	14.4%66	28.9%46	47.4%64	67.6%44	17.8%54	31.4%44
JT Toppin	1,426	976	59.4%	17.576	122.680	105.054	54.4%64	36.3%70	13.0%76	28.2%44	48.8%58	69.6%52	17.1%50	36.1%32
Kevin Overton	1,275	1,127	53.1%	19.678	120.676	101.066	54.2%62	38.1%76	16.2%54	31.0%52	46.5%68	69.3%52	18.2%58	33.5%38
Kerwin Walton	1,093	1,309	45.5%	11.866	119.674	107.748	53.5%60	35.3%68	13.8%70	31.2%54	51.0%48	70.2%56	16.9%48	35.4%34
Federiko Federiko	1,057	1,345	44.0%	19.378	117.670	98.370	53.4%60	36.9%74	16.5%50	29.3%48	46.0%70	70.2%56	18.5%60	29.3%50
Devan Cambridge	172	2,230	7.2%	46.398	128.688	82.392	61.1%88	35.7%70	14.0%70	15.1%10	40.2%88	66.3%38	28.2%96	32.3%40
Eemeli Yalaho	142	2,261	5.9%	15.774	125.084	109.344	62.9%92	36.2%70	20.5%24	30.8%52	43.9%78	56.3%10	16.8%48	37.4%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Hawkins	1,779	624	74.0%	28.088	130.290	102.162	58.9%82	39.8%80	15.4%60	33.0%58	48.0%62	69.1%50	18.2%58	30.5%46
Christian Anderson	1,703	699	70.9%	21.580	121.878	100.268	56.8%74	37.9%76	16.2%54	21.8%26	45.7%72	67.6%44	17.4%52	33.6%38
Darrion Williams	1,636	766	68.1%	11.966	114.662	102.760	50.9%46	37.7%76	16.3%52	31.6%54	47.2%66	69.7%54	18.0%56	37.4%28
Chance McMillian	1,631	772	67.9%	8.762	114.062	105.354	50.9%46	34.8%66	14.9%64	30.2%50	49.5%56	70.9%60	17.9%56	38.5%26
JT Toppin	1,426	976	59.4%	18.578	119.774	101.364	55.4%68	35.7%70	16.8%48	31.1%54	47.0%66	67.4%42	18.8%62	30.0%46
Kevin Overton	1,275	1,127	53.1%	16.074	122.380	106.352	55.5%68	33.7%62	12.8%78	27.4%42	49.7%56	67.8%44	17.3%52	33.6%38
Kerwin Walton	1,093	1,309	45.5%	23.082	123.080	100.068	55.8%70	36.7%72	15.2%60	27.7%42	45.6%72	67.4%42	18.5%60	32.1%42
Federiko Federiko	1,057	1,345	44.0%	16.774	124.482	107.648	55.9%70	35.4%68	13.1%76	29.3%48	49.7%56	67.4%42	17.3%52	37.0%30
Devan Cambridge	172	2,230	7.2%	15.874	120.976	105.154	54.3%64	36.1%70	14.6%66	30.5%52	48.6%60	68.8%50	17.0%48	33.6%38
Eemeli Yalaho	142	2,261	5.9%	18.176	121.278	103.160	54.3%64	36.1%70	14.2%68	29.2%48	48.3%60	69.7%54	17.9%56	33.3%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.