UC Irvine23-10

Big WestCoach: Russ Turner

23-10NET#70

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,517	710	68.1%	+4.568	+4.976	+0.446	+3.986	−1.240	+0.246	−0.748	+1.138	+2.574	−0.938	−7.684
Pierre Crockrell II	1,476	751	66.3%	+5.872	+9.190	+3.332	+6.898	−4.118	−2.684	−0.748	−0.858	−0.942	−3.310	−1.960
Andre Henry	1,475	752	66.2%	+9.182	+8.488	−0.752	+3.282	−1.240	−3.490	+2.464	−0.656	+0.556	−3.98	−11.592
Devin Tillis	1,248	979	56.1%	+11.686	+14.698	+3.034	+8.6100	−2.728	−3.288	+1.360	−1.564	+0.456	−5.14	−6.982
Derin Saran	957	1,270	43.0%	−13.012	−9.612	+3.332	−6.66	+5.088	+2.614	+0.454	+2.922	+0.758	+2.786	+7.912
Dean Keeler	794	1,433	35.7%	−1.644	−4.030	−2.462	−1.238	+4.988	+3.310	−2.836	−0.556	−0.448	+2.282	+4.326
Bent Leuchten	774	1,453	34.8%	+10.986	+8.588	−2.462	+1.566	−1.142	−4.996	+1.358	−1.262	+0.152	−1.134	−10.492
Carter Welling	696	1,531	31.3%	−9.120	−3.632	+5.622	−1.040	−3.126	+0.736	+0.254	+2.426	−1.438	−1.330	+1.640
Langston Redfield	653	1,574	29.3%	−2.840	−7.218	−4.472	−3.916	−0.150	+1.922	+2.868	−0.252	+1.162	+2.484	−0.250
Ofure Ujadughele	637	1,590	28.6%	+6.774	−6.620	−13.496	−6.16	+3.984	+1.032	+3.370	−4.588	+2.978	+4.998	+9.110
Dylan Thoerner	590	1,637	26.5%	−7.526	−8.016	−0.552	−4.114	+0.354	+1.824	−4.924	−0.958	−4.316	+4.296	+14.62
Hayden Welling	313	1,914	14.0%	−28.52	−15.54	+13.04	−4.812	−0.646	+5.52	−4.726	+6.44	−4.116	+0.762	+6.218

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,517	710	68.1%	13.270	113.160	99.966	53.1%60	33.5%62	17.1%46	33.3%58	46.8%66	71.5%62	17.3%52	32.8%38
Pierre Crockrell II	1,476	751	66.3%	13.770	114.664	100.864	54.2%64	32.4%58	16.1%52	33.3%58	46.1%70	70.3%56	16.5%46	34.5%32
Andre Henry	1,475	752	66.2%	14.872	114.364	99.568	52.9%58	33.4%62	15.9%54	34.3%62	46.2%68	70.8%58	16.3%46	31.5%42
Devin Tillis	1,248	979	56.1%	16.874	117.972	101.164	55.7%70	32.5%58	15.6%56	34.1%62	45.8%70	70.8%58	15.3%38	32.2%40
Derin Saran	957	1,270	43.0%	4.454	106.044	101.662	48.1%36	36.6%72	18.5%36	33.7%60	48.1%60	71.1%60	19.2%64	39.8%22
Dean Keeler	794	1,433	35.7%	10.764	108.950	98.270	51.1%50	37.0%74	19.1%32	31.7%56	46.1%70	70.4%56	19.0%64	38.0%24
Bent Leuchten	774	1,453	34.8%	18.978	117.070	98.270	52.8%58	33.2%58	13.8%70	34.4%62	45.7%72	70.7%58	16.9%50	28.5%50
Carter Welling	696	1,531	31.3%	5.556	109.050	103.658	51.2%50	31.8%54	17.5%42	33.7%60	48.1%60	69.7%54	16.7%48	36.2%28
Langston Redfield	653	1,574	29.3%	9.864	106.444	96.674	49.1%40	33.8%64	18.4%36	35.5%64	46.3%68	71.4%60	19.3%66	35.0%32
Ofure Ujadughele	637	1,590	28.6%	16.374	106.844	90.584	47.5%34	36.5%72	17.7%40	35.9%66	43.2%80	72.7%66	21.0%76	41.7%18
Dylan Thoerner	590	1,637	26.5%	6.358	105.742	99.468	48.8%40	34.1%64	18.3%38	29.9%50	45.7%72	67.5%44	20.7%74	46.2%14
Hayden Welling	313	1,914	14.0%	-12.726	98.226	110.938	47.7%34	33.3%62	21.8%18	29.5%50	51.9%42	67.1%42	18.2%60	40.5%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,517	710	68.1%	8.762	108.148	99.468	49.2%40	34.7%66	16.9%46	34.0%62	45.6%72	69.0%50	18.2%58	40.3%22
Pierre Crockrell II	1,476	751	66.3%	7.960	105.542	97.672	47.3%32	36.5%72	18.8%34	34.0%62	46.9%66	71.3%60	19.8%68	36.5%28
Andre Henry	1,475	752	66.2%	5.756	105.942	100.266	49.7%42	34.7%66	19.3%30	31.9%56	46.8%66	70.3%56	20.2%72	43.0%18
Devin Tillis	1,248	979	56.1%	5.256	103.336	98.170	47.1%32	35.3%68	18.8%34	32.8%58	47.3%64	70.4%56	20.4%72	39.1%22
Derin Saran	957	1,270	43.0%	17.376	115.666	98.370	54.7%66	31.6%54	15.9%54	33.4%60	45.2%74	70.4%56	16.5%46	31.9%40
Dean Keeler	794	1,433	35.7%	12.368	112.960	100.664	52.3%56	32.1%56	15.8%54	34.5%62	46.6%68	70.8%58	16.8%48	33.6%34
Bent Leuchten	774	1,453	34.8%	8.060	108.550	100.664	51.3%50	34.2%64	18.7%34	33.1%58	46.8%66	70.6%58	18.0%58	38.9%24
Carter Welling	696	1,531	31.3%	14.672	112.660	98.070	52.1%56	34.8%66	16.8%48	33.5%60	45.6%72	71.1%60	18.0%58	34.6%32
Langston Redfield	653	1,574	29.3%	12.668	113.662	101.064	53.0%58	33.9%64	16.5%50	32.7%58	46.5%68	70.3%56	16.9%50	35.2%32
Ofure Ujadughele	637	1,590	28.6%	9.664	113.460	103.856	53.6%62	32.6%58	16.7%48	32.6%58	47.7%62	69.8%54	16.1%44	32.6%38
Dylan Thoerner	590	1,637	26.5%	13.770	113.662	99.966	52.9%58	33.8%64	16.6%48	34.8%64	46.6%68	71.8%62	16.5%46	31.5%42
Hayden Welling	313	1,914	14.0%	15.772	113.762	97.970	52.5%56	33.9%64	16.2%52	34.2%62	45.5%72	71.2%60	17.5%54	34.3%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.