Schedule
WWL
L
LW
LL
WL
LLWLLW
W
LLWLLWLLLWLLWWTeam Stats
14 games- Net Rating-11.515
- Offensive Rating99.918
- Defensive Rating111.432
- Pace68.772
- Effective FG%55.0%95
- Off Rebound Pct16.7%1
- Turnover Pct20.0%54
- FT Attempt Rate20.8%0
Team Stats
14 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-11.515
- Offensive Rating99.918
- Defensive Rating111.432
- Pace68.772
- Effective FG%55.0%95
- Off Rebound Pct16.7%1
- Turnover Pct20.0%54
- FT Attempt Rate20.8%0
Results & Margin
- Win Pct28.6%16
- Point Margin / Game-7.913
- Points / Game68.637
- Points Allowed / Game76.615
- 1st Half Margin-5.212
- 2nd Half Margin-2.722
- Avg Largest Lead7.925
- Avg Largest Deficit15.614
Box Score
- Points / Game68.637
- Rebounds / Game27.91
- Assists / Game16.597
- ORebs / Game5.51
- DRebs / Game22.47
- Steals / Game5.730
- Blocks / Game1.73
- Turnovers / Game13.739
- PFs / Game14.198
Shooting
- FGMs / Game25.760
- FGAs / Game55.927
- Field Goal Pct46.0%83
- 2PMs / Game15.611
- 2PAs / Game28.51
- 2-Point Pct54.6%93
- 3PMs / Game10.198
- 3PAs / Game27.496
- 3-Point Pct37.0%88
- FTMs / Game7.10
- FTAs / Game11.61
- Free Throw Pct60.7%2
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s45.4%9
- % Pts from 3s44.3%99
- % Pts from FTs10.3%0
- Paint Pts / Game22.378
- % Pts in Paint32.5%81
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.744
- % Pts on Fast Break6.9%46
- Points off TOVs / Game12.054
- % Pts off TOVs17.5%57
- 1st Half Pts / Game30.014
- 2nd Half Pts / Game37.868
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %56.2%82
- Points / Shot1.2354
- 3-Point Att Rate49.0%98
- Assist Pct64.2%99
- Assists / 100 Poss24.090
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.20x83
- PF Drawn / Game14.22
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%54.5%7
- Opp True Shooting %57.1%12
- Opp Field Goal Pct48.1%5
- Opp 2-Point Pct53.3%18
- Opp 3-Point Pct38.0%6
- Opp 3PA Rate33.6%82
- Opp FT Att Rate22.4%98
- Opp Points / Shot1.2633
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game76.615
- Paint Pts Allowed26.95
- Fast Break Pts Allowed6.927
- Pts off TOVs Allowed15.99
- Opp Assist Pct56.4%19
- TOVs Forced / Game12.945
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct68.3%14
- Turnovers Forced Pct18.7%31
- Steal Pct8.3%22
- Block Pct2.5%2
- Hakeem Pct10.8%6
- PF Efficiency0.99x53
- Steals / PF0.41x73
- Blocks / PF0.12x12
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 347 D-I teams- #4AST%64.2%
- #20eFG%55.0%
- #433P%37.0%
- #553PM Diff+33
- #61TS%55.8%
- #103SOS3.5
- #110PO TOV Diff-55
- #122Paint Pts %41.4%
Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
- #4AST%64.2%
- #20eFG%55.0%
- #433P%37.0%
- #553PM Diff+33
- #61TS%55.8%
- #103SOS3.5
- #110PO TOV Diff-55
- #122Paint Pts %41.4%
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
- #346FTAR20.8%
- #344OREB%16.7%
- #329REB Diff-140
- #326Opp 3P%38.0%
- #324Opp eFG%54.5%
- #302Opp OREB%31.7%
- #296Adj DRtg108.7
- #268Pts Diff-111
Most Similar Seasons
to 2020-21- 1
Washington St.Wash. St. 2017-1812-19Pac 12Most alike in 3PA rate, TOV%, FT rate76 - 2
Saint Joseph'sSt. Joe's 2020-215-15A10Most alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, Adj D74 - 3
Le Moyne 2023-2412-17NECMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, Tempo73 - 4
Nicholls St.Nicholls 2018-1910-17SouthlandMost alike in FT rate, Opp TOV%, Tempo71 - 5Hartford 2015-169-23America EastMost alike in OREB%, 3PA rate, Tempo71
- 6UC Davis 2013-147-22Big WestMost alike in Opp TOV%, Tempo, Opp OREB%69
- 7
North FloridaUNF 2023-2413-16ASUNMost alike in Adj D, Adj O, eFG%68 - 8
Elon 2018-199-21CAAMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, Tempo67 - 9Hartford 2021-2212-20America EastMost alike in Adj O, Adj D, eFG%65
- 10
Chattanooga 2025-2610-19SouthernMost alike in Adj D, Adj O, OREB%65
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JakeKillingsworthSr
MikeyHowellSrHBHughBaxterSr
GHGabeHadleySr
ToniRocakJr
JaceRoquemoreFr
BrycePopeFrMGMattGraySo
TRTraceRamseyJr
JakekosakowskiFrLTLundenTaylorSo
MTMartinTombeSr
JPJustinPrattSo
KRKadenRasheedJr
| J. KillingsworthJake Killingsworth | Sr | 6'5" | +0.982 | – | – | 60.4%79 | 13.8%23 | 8.4 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 36.2% | 64.7% |
| M. HowellMikey Howell | Sr | 6'3" | +0.776 | – | – | 50.9%39 | 19.1%58 | 6.9 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 33.3% | 58.3% |
| H. BaxterHugh Baxter | Sr | 6'8" | +0.775 | – | – | 57.2%67 | 22.6%79 | 10.0 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 38.9% | 70.0% |
| G. HadleyGabe Hadley | Sr | 6'4" | +0.150 | – | – | 63.5%86 | 19.7%62 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 39.0% | 68.4% |
| T. RocakToni Rocak | Jr | 6'8" | -0.048 | – | – | 52.2%44 | 37.6%99 | 12.8 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 24.0% | 62.1% |
| J. RoquemoreJace Roquemore | Fr | 6'5" | -0.525 | – | – | 43.6%19 | 16.7%41 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 21.4% | 50.0% |
| B. PopeBryce Pope | Fr | 6'3" | -0.817 | – | – | 56.2%63 | 17.3%45 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 38.3% | 20.0% |
| M. GrayMatt Gray | So | 6'8" | – | – | – | 55.3%59 | 22.9%80 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| T. RamseyTrace Ramsey | Jr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 83.3%96 | 15.4%32 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| J. kosakowskiJake kosakowski | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 72.9%94 | 19.0%58 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 60.0% | 0.0% |
| L. TaylorLunden Taylor | So | 6'3" | – | – | – | 73.9%94 | 16.3%38 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| M. TombeMartin Tombe | Sr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 125.0%99 | 13.5%21 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| J. PrattJustin Pratt | So | 6'3" | – | – | – | – | 13.4%20 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| K. RasheedKaden Rasheed | Jr | 6'1" | – | – | – | 63.8%86 | 11.4%13 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 53.3% | 80.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 25-26 | 23-11 | #127 | 3.065 | 107.841 | 104.879 | -3.541 | +4557 | +146 | 27.3%18 | -1859 | 52.9%65 | 33.1%35 | 69.5%24 |
| 24-2512 | 30-5 | #34 | 18.891 | 116.286 | 97.494 | -3.245 | -1536 | +10295 | 26.7%18 | -253100 | 55.5%92 | 36.2%82 | 74.6%75 |
| 23-24 | 21-12 | #120 | 4.367 | 112.179 | 107.843 | -4.429 | +2250 | +6288 | 28.1%37 | -6183 | 53.3%82 | 35.8%78 | 75.2%85 |
| 22-23 | 10-20 | #280 | -9.219 | 100.120 | 109.326 | -2.245 | -10011 | -541 | 23.7%10 | +1834 | 49.7%33 | 32.8%30 | 73.9%74 |
| 21-22 | 13-16 | #260 | -8.422 | 101.636 | 109.918 | -6.115 | -1357 | +8396 | 18.6%1 | +1338 | 52.8%80 | 37.0%91 | 74.8%80 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
55.8%#59
Effective FG %
55.0%#18
3-Point %
37.0%#41
3PAR
49.0%#6
FTAR
20.8%#346
Assist %
64.2%#4
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
30.1%#283
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
19.1%#27
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
7 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.1295D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.169732.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.085940.0% of shots
Late 21s+1.148627.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0333Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.033635.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.045737.0% of shots
Late 21s+1.033427.1% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.