Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Elon logoElon logoElon logoElon logo

Elon9-21

CAACoach: Matt Matheny

9-21NET#315
Schedule
WManhattan logoManhattan logoLNorth Carolina logoNorth Carolina logoWLAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoLUC Riverside logoUC Riverside logoLPacific logoPacific logoWLBoston University logoBoston University logoLFurman logoFurman logoLUNC Greensboro logoUNC Greensboro logoLCanisius logoCanisius logoWKennesaw St. logoKennesaw St. logoLUMKC logoUMKC logoLTowson logoTowson logoWJames Madison logoJames Madison logoLDrexel logoDrexel logoLDelaware logoDelaware logoLNortheastern logoNortheastern logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoWWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoLCharleston logoCharleston logoWUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logoWDelaware logoDelaware logoLDrexel logoDrexel logoLHofstra logoHofstra logoLNortheastern logoNortheastern logoLWilliam & Mary logoWilliam & Mary logoWUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logoLCharleston logoCharleston logoWJames Madison logoJames Madison logoWTowson logoTowson logoLUNC Wilmington logoUNC Wilmington logo

Team Stats

30 games
  • Net Rating-12.912
  • Offensive Rating111.856
  • Defensive Rating124.717
  • Pace61.929
  • Effective FG%52.0%68
  • Off Rebound Pct22.3%6
  • Turnover Pct20.5%38
  • FT Attempt Rate24.3%3

Team Stats

30 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-12.912
  • Offensive Rating111.856
  • Defensive Rating124.717
  • Pace61.929
  • Effective FG%52.0%68
  • Off Rebound Pct22.3%6
  • Turnover Pct20.5%38
  • FT Attempt Rate24.3%3

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct30.0%16
  • Point Margin / Game-8.011
  • Points / Game69.230
  • Points Allowed / Game77.218
  • 1st Half Margin-2.129
  • 2nd Half Margin-5.84
  • Avg Largest Lead8.328
  • Avg Largest Deficit14.715

Box Score

  • Points / Game69.230
  • Rebounds / Game32.618
  • Assists / Game14.072
  • ORebs / Game7.89
  • DRebs / Game24.845
  • Steals / Game4.01
  • Blocks / Game1.96
  • Turnovers / Game12.756
  • PFs / Game17.071

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.838
  • FGAs / Game57.345
  • Field Goal Pct43.4%41
  • 2PMs / Game14.97
  • 2PAs / Game28.63
  • 2-Point Pct52.2%75
  • 3PMs / Game9.995
  • 3PAs / Game28.698
  • 3-Point Pct34.6%55
  • FTMs / Game9.63
  • FTAs / Game13.94
  • Free Throw Pct69.3%36

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s43.2%7
  • % Pts from 3s42.9%97
  • % Pts from FTs13.9%3
  • Paint Pts / Game17.930
  • % Pts in Paint25.9%34
  • Fast Break Pts / Game2.39
  • % Pts on Fast Break3.4%10
  • Points off TOVs / Game10.439
  • % Pts off TOVs15.0%42
  • 1st Half Pts / Game33.549
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game35.420

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.6%54
  • Points / Shot1.2128
  • 3-Point Att Rate50.0%98
  • Assist Pct56.4%84
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.677
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.10x67
  • PF Drawn / Game16.114

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%53.5%16
  • Opp True Shooting %56.9%18
  • Opp Field Goal Pct45.9%24
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.4%34
  • Opp 3-Point Pct37.8%8
  • Opp 3PA Rate40.2%33
  • Opp FT Att Rate29.4%77
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2930

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game77.218
  • Paint Pts Allowed24.229
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.623
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed13.920
  • Opp Assist Pct52.6%45
  • TOVs Forced / Game10.54

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct71.8%50
  • Turnovers Forced Pct16.9%9
  • Steal Pct6.4%1
  • Block Pct3.0%6
  • Hakeem Pct9.4%1
  • PF Efficiency1.06x27
  • Steals / PF0.23x2
  • Blocks / PF0.11x9

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 353 D-I teams
  • #56AST%56.4%
  • #105PO TOV Diff-117
  • #117eFG%52.0%
  • #1173PM Diff+24
  • #157TS%54.2%
  • #161TOV%18.5%
  • #1623P%34.6%
  • #177Opp OREB%28.2%
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #56AST%56.4%
  • #105PO TOV Diff-117
  • #117eFG%52.0%
  • #1173PM Diff+24
  • #157TS%54.2%
  • #161TOV%18.5%
  • #1623P%34.6%
  • #177Opp OREB%28.2%
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #343FTAR24.3%
  • #341Opp TOV%15.2%
  • #332OREB%22.3%
  • #327Opp 3P%37.8%
  • #318Pts Diff-239
  • #311REB Diff-130
  • #311Adj DRtg111.2
  • #301Opp eFG%53.5%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2018-19
Find Similar
  1. 1Charleston Southern logoCharleston Southern logoCharleston Southern 2015-166-21Big South90
  2. 2Cornell logoCornell logoCornell 2016-177-21Ivy82
  3. 3Illinois Chicago logoIllinois Chicago logoIllinois Chicago 2021-2213-16Horizon79
  4. 4Tennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech logoTennessee Tech 2024-2513-17OVC78
  5. 5Chattanooga logoChattanooga logoChattanooga 2025-2610-19Southern78
  6. 6Loyola MD logoLoyola MD logoLoyola MD 2025-2610-20Patriot78
  7. 7North Dakota logoNorth Dakota logoNorth Dakota 2022-2311-20Summit78
  8. 8Binghamton logoBinghamton logoBinghamton 2019-208-19America East78
  9. 9San Jose St. logoSan Jose St. logoSan Jose St. 2021-227-23MWC77
  10. 10VMI logoVMI logoVMI 2019-206-24Southern76
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Tyler Seibring headshotTylerSeibringSrSteven Santa Ana headshotSteven SantaAnaSr
Chuck Hannah headshotChuckHannahFr
Dainan Swoope headshotDainanSwoopeSrSheldon Eberhardt headshotSheldonEberhardtSrKris Wooten headshotKrisWootenFrNathan Priddy headshotNathanPriddySo
FPFedericoPoserFr
KKKarolisKundrotasSr
SFSethFullerSo
Simon Wright headshotSimonWrightSo
DRDujeRadjaSo
CSChristianScottSo
APAndyPackFr
T. SeibringSr6'9"+0.672––60.6%7921.7%7516.55.91.539.9%80.0%
S. Santa AnaSr6'4"-0.045––58.2%6926.2%9216.06.32.735.4%70.1%
C. HannahFr6'6"-0.236––57.3%6612.1%134.52.80.628.3%55.0%
D. SwoopeSr6'0"-0.719––65.3%8917.4%458.01.42.236.4%75.0%
S. EberhardtSr6'5"-0.717––53.5%4725.3%8910.33.03.231.3%79.3%
K. WootenFr6'3"-0.816––50.4%3215.0%285.41.71.235.0%25.0%
N. PriddySo6'2"-0.913––47.9%2319.1%587.32.82.533.6%85.0%
F. PoserFr6'8"-1.35––53.4%4618.8%563.82.81.00.0%55.3%
K. KundrotasSr6'11"–––59.4%7414.4%252.12.30.420.0%42.9%
S. FullerSo5'11"–––55.3%5611.3%101.71.10.623.5%83.3%
S. WrightSo6'7"–––53.0%4414.4%251.91.80.628.0%41.7%
D. RadjaSo6'8"–––0.0%212.9%160.01.00.00.0%0.0%
C. ScottSo6'1"––––0.0%10.50.50.00.0%0.0%
A. PackFr6'4"–––52.1%4020.0%643.51.90.836.0%52.2%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Elon logoElon logo25-2614-18#227-4.838111.564116.315-3.046+242-183333.3%73-246352.5%6034.3%5672.2%45
Elon logoElon logo24-2517-16#182-0.854110.167110.932-4.534+22796-302337.6%97+117351.2%4933.0%3774.9%79
Elon logoElon logo23-2413-19#315-9.718104.841114.55-5.125-4429+95530.2%62+243152.0%6735.2%6970.7%34
Elon logoElon logo22-238-24#333-13.7897.28110.917-4.223-7320-73725.7%23+263048.6%1830.2%470.8%41
Elon logoElon logo21-2210-22#268-6.927100.530107.3311.367-6523+407625.8%26+651350.1%4634.2%5773.7%71
Elon logoElon logo19-2012-21#281-8.620100.236108.812-2.939-8218+748923.5%14-115450.6%5836.3%8973.6%75
Elon logoElon logo18-1911-21#315-12.41299.119111.512-3.631-8817+498123.8%10+721152.6%7035.6%6869.3%38
Elon logoElon logo17-1814-18#241-6.431103.837110.126-1.255-8419+55422.6%7+461852.7%7134.9%4971.1%49
Elon logoElon logo16-1718-14#1351.558103.850102.366-1.452+846+578525.0%13+213552.5%7335.5%5868.5%33
Elon logoElon logo15-1614-16#171-0.850105.455106.2400.461-3336+849528.0%30+342752.3%7934.2%4566.1%13
Elon logoElon logo14-1513-18#245-5.13398.021103.150-2.936-7422+327428.8%23-487748.6%4135.1%6168.3%39
Elon logoElon logo13-1416-13#198-1.347106.153107.441-4.823-2737+829427.8%16+213453.9%9237.5%8372.3%75

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.2%#155
Effective FG %
52.0%#112
3-Point %
34.6%#159
3PAR
50.0%#7
FTAR
24.3%#341
Assist %
56.4%#56

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
24.2%#350
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
26.1%#180
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

23 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 39.7% of shots at 0.73 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8039.7%0.73Middle (11–20s): 36.2% of shots at 1.27 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2336.2%1.27Late (21s+): 24.1% of shots at 1.26 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1624.1%1.26SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0573D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.732539.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.276636.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.267824.1% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 46.5% of shots at 0.85 points per shot, against a D-I 0.8146.5%0.85Middle (11–20s): 30.1% of shots at 1.37 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2330.1%1.37Late (21s+): 23.4% of shots at 1.21 points per shot, against a D-I 1.1623.4%1.21SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0912Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.853146.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.37730.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.213723.4% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.