UCF19-18

Big 12Coach: Johnny Dawkins

19-18NET#83

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	2,220	400	84.7%	+11.088	+2.766	−8.388	+1.466	−2.430	−1.774	−6.318	−4.288	−2.328	+1.980	+0.646
Keyshawn Hall	1,935	686	73.8%	−3.736	−2.138	+1.540	−1.832	+2.574	+1.724	−0.748	+3.416	+4.086	−0.346	+3.032
Moustapha Thiam	1,722	898	65.7%	+3.564	+1.058	−2.564	+0.252	+3.180	−0.252	−5.522	−1.262	−0.250	+1.170	−2.162
Jordan Ivy-Curry	1,673	947	63.9%	−2.940	+4.274	+7.114	−1.832	+2.574	−3.994	+1.460	+2.722	+0.456	−0.838	+5.918
Dallan Coleman	1,565	1,055	59.7%	+10.086	+1.860	−8.388	−1.832	+3.884	+0.344	+1.762	+0.346	+4.188	+3.494	−5.076
Benny Williams	759	1,861	29.0%	+2.662	+3.570	+0.944	+2.576	−0.348	+0.936	+3.772	+0.840	−2.428	+0.864	−4.574
Nils Machowski	699	1,921	26.7%	+3.766	−4.030	−7.786	−0.150	−4.514	+0.836	−0.252	−2.172	+6.596	−0.542	+0.448
JJ Taylor	583	2,037	22.3%	+0.452	−0.050	−0.452	+1.668	−0.744	+3.010	+13.598	−4.288	−4.016	−0.346	+6.916
Tyler Hendricks	538	2,082	20.5%	+12.992	+6.582	−6.482	+5.394	−2.628	−3.290	−5.224	−4.488	+2.676	−1.724	−8.088
Dior Johnson	494	2,126	18.9%	−23.04	−5.822	+17.20	−1.040	+2.272	+3.210	+1.158	+5.46	−3.916	−4.44	+1.640
Mikey Williams	460	2,160	17.5%	−11.416	−4.328	+7.016	−3.518	−3.322	−2.786	+1.360	+3.516	−5.110	+0.560	+5.022
Rokas Jocius	363	2,257	13.9%	−6.328	−1.940	+4.426	+0.456	−1.438	+0.738	−7.414	−0.554	−3.818	−1.526	+0.348

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	2,220	400	84.7%	1.148	110.652	109.544	49.4%40	34.0%62	16.8%48	34.9%64	50.3%50	63.1%26	18.3%58	31.1%44
Keyshawn Hall	1,935	686	73.8%	-1.644	109.650	111.238	48.7%36	35.1%66	17.5%44	35.7%66	51.9%44	64.6%32	17.9%56	31.8%42
Moustapha Thiam	1,722	898	65.7%	0.648	110.552	109.942	49.2%38	35.5%68	17.0%46	34.0%60	50.6%50	63.4%28	18.4%60	30.3%46
Jordan Ivy-Curry	1,673	947	63.9%	-1.744	111.756	113.434	48.5%36	35.2%68	15.6%58	36.3%66	52.0%44	63.6%28	17.7%54	33.2%38
Dallan Coleman	1,565	1,055	59.7%	3.554	110.954	107.448	48.4%36	35.9%70	17.1%46	36.5%68	51.1%48	65.1%34	19.4%66	28.9%50
Benny Williams	759	1,861	29.0%	1.248	112.658	111.438	50.9%46	34.1%64	17.6%42	38.5%72	51.5%46	61.8%22	18.5%60	27.8%54
Nils Machowski	699	1,921	26.7%	2.150	107.244	105.154	49.1%38	31.1%52	17.6%42	35.7%66	49.4%56	68.3%46	17.6%54	31.3%44
JJ Taylor	583	2,037	22.3%	-0.346	110.152	110.540	50.4%46	33.8%62	19.4%30	46.5%84	47.8%64	60.4%18	17.8%54	36.3%30
Tyler Hendricks	538	2,082	20.5%	9.664	115.364	105.754	53.3%60	32.3%56	14.5%66	31.7%54	47.5%64	65.5%36	16.6%46	24.7%64
Dior Johnson	494	2,126	18.9%	-19.218	105.440	124.614	48.4%34	36.2%70	19.6%28	36.7%68	55.3%28	60.3%18	14.4%32	32.3%40
Mikey Williams	460	2,160	17.5%	-10.030	106.644	116.526	46.3%26	31.7%54	14.8%64	36.9%68	53.8%34	59.1%16	18.4%60	35.1%34
Rokas Jocius	363	2,257	13.9%	-6.136	108.548	114.630	49.5%40	33.2%58	17.6%42	29.5%48	50.6%50	60.2%18	16.7%46	31.3%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	2,220	400	84.7%	-9.930	107.946	117.824	48.0%32	36.4%72	18.5%36	41.2%76	54.6%32	65.4%36	16.4%44	30.5%46
Keyshawn Hall	1,935	686	73.8%	2.150	111.756	109.644	50.5%46	32.6%56	15.8%56	36.3%66	48.5%60	60.6%20	18.2%58	28.8%52
Moustapha Thiam	1,722	898	65.7%	-2.942	109.550	112.436	49.0%38	32.3%56	17.1%46	39.5%74	51.7%44	63.6%28	17.3%52	32.3%40
Jordan Ivy-Curry	1,673	947	63.9%	1.248	107.446	106.252	50.3%46	32.7%58	19.5%28	34.9%64	49.2%56	63.2%28	18.5%60	27.3%56
Dallan Coleman	1,565	1,055	59.7%	-6.636	109.150	115.728	50.2%46	32.1%56	16.9%48	34.8%64	50.8%50	61.0%20	16.0%42	33.9%38
Benny Williams	759	1,861	29.0%	-1.344	109.150	110.540	48.4%36	34.5%64	16.8%48	34.8%64	50.8%50	64.2%30	17.8%54	32.3%40
Nils Machowski	699	1,921	26.7%	-1.644	111.254	112.834	49.2%38	35.6%68	16.8%48	35.9%66	51.5%46	61.8%22	18.1%58	30.9%44
JJ Taylor	583	2,037	22.3%	-0.746	110.252	110.840	48.8%38	34.6%64	16.3%52	33.0%58	51.9%44	64.4%32	18.1%58	29.4%50
Tyler Hendricks	538	2,082	20.5%	-3.342	108.850	112.136	48.0%34	34.9%66	17.7%42	36.9%68	51.9%44	62.9%26	18.3%60	32.7%40
Dior Johnson	494	2,126	18.9%	3.854	111.254	107.448	49.3%40	34.0%62	16.4%52	35.6%66	49.9%54	64.2%30	18.8%62	30.6%46
Mikey Williams	460	2,160	17.5%	1.450	110.954	109.544	49.8%40	35.0%66	17.5%42	35.6%66	50.4%50	64.3%30	17.9%56	30.1%46
Rokas Jocius	363	2,257	13.9%	0.348	110.452	110.142	49.1%38	34.6%64	16.9%46	36.9%68	51.0%48	64.0%30	18.2%58	30.9%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.