USC15-18

Pac 12Coach: Andy Enfield

15-18NET#89

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Boogie Ellis	1,607	568	73.9%	+4.368	+10.092	+5.820	+6.096	−2.034	−2.986	−1.244	+2.228	−5.610	+1.776	+4.922
Kobe Johnson	1,549	625	71.2%	+1.556	+5.878	+4.228	+3.986	−1.934	−1.368	+2.968	+3.418	−3.620	+2.584	+2.834
DJ Rodman	1,414	761	65.0%	+8.680	+4.574	−4.170	+3.182	−4.716	−2.380	+2.364	+0.050	+1.768	+1.068	−6.982
Isaiah Collier	1,352	823	62.2%	+4.368	+6.382	+2.138	+4.388	−3.324	−1.672	+5.280	+5.08	−1.042	+4.998	+0.646
Joshua Morgan	1,022	1,153	47.0%	+4.066	+3.166	−0.954	+3.584	−3.126	−0.454	−4.526	−1.968	−2.726	+0.254	+8.212
Vince Iwuchukwu	796	1,379	36.6%	−11.016	−10.310	+0.746	−5.58	+3.580	+2.912	−2.340	+0.742	+6.596	−4.06	−8.386
Bronny James	772	1,402	35.5%	−6.228	−6.320	−0.150	−3.916	−1.636	−1.672	−8.312	+2.326	+3.280	+0.660	−1.558
Oziyah Sellers	742	1,432	34.1%	−7.526	−7.318	+0.248	−3.916	+5.390	+5.04	+0.756	−3.582	+3.178	−6.12	+0.646
Harrison Hornery	598	1,576	27.5%	−4.534	−2.836	+1.740	−2.824	+0.758	+0.640	+4.576	+0.444	+1.768	−1.034	+7.514
Kijani Wright	533	1,642	24.5%	+11.586	+3.570	−8.084	−2.922	+4.988	−2.684	−0.648	−5.592	−4.414	+1.978	−6.180
Arrinten Page	470	1,705	21.6%	−2.542	−6.320	−3.868	−1.932	+3.278	+4.64	+3.170	−4.688	+0.556	−1.726	−2.462

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Boogie Ellis	1,607	568	73.9%	1.750	111.556	109.742	53.4%62	31.7%54	17.4%44	33.0%58	51.2%46	63.1%26	19.8%68	32.3%38
Kobe Johnson	1,549	625	71.2%	1.148	110.554	109.442	53.0%60	31.7%54	17.8%40	34.2%62	51.7%44	63.6%28	20.1%70	31.8%40
DJ Rodman	1,414	761	65.0%	3.652	110.454	106.848	53.0%58	30.5%50	17.3%44	34.2%62	50.7%48	65.2%34	19.7%68	28.6%50
Isaiah Collier	1,352	823	62.2%	2.250	111.256	109.044	53.5%62	31.0%52	17.5%42	35.3%64	52.7%38	64.2%30	21.2%78	31.2%42
Joshua Morgan	1,022	1,153	47.0%	2.852	110.554	107.746	53.7%62	30.6%50	17.9%40	30.9%54	49.7%54	63.2%26	19.4%66	35.4%30
Vince Iwuchukwu	796	1,379	36.6%	-6.436	102.334	108.744	48.4%38	34.4%64	20.0%26	31.9%56	51.1%46	68.7%48	16.9%50	25.9%58
Bronny James	772	1,402	35.5%	-3.440	104.840	108.246	49.4%42	31.3%52	17.1%46	28.1%46	52.1%40	66.7%42	19.7%68	30.0%46
Oziyah Sellers	742	1,432	34.1%	-4.440	104.038	108.446	49.3%40	35.7%70	21.4%18	33.8%60	48.4%58	66.6%38	15.3%40	31.4%42
Harrison Hornery	598	1,576	27.5%	-2.742	106.844	109.542	49.8%42	32.8%58	18.6%36	36.6%68	51.0%46	65.9%36	18.6%62	36.5%28
Kijani Wright	533	1,642	24.5%	9.362	111.556	102.260	49.7%42	35.9%72	16.1%52	32.9%58	46.6%68	61.4%22	20.8%76	26.5%56
Arrinten Page	470	1,705	21.6%	-1.344	103.938	105.354	50.4%46	34.7%66	21.7%18	35.8%66	47.1%64	65.0%34	18.0%58	29.2%48

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Boogie Ellis	1,607	568	73.9%	-2.542	101.432	104.056	47.4%34	33.7%64	20.3%24	34.2%62	49.1%56	68.8%50	18.1%58	27.4%54
Kobe Johnson	1,549	625	71.2%	-0.546	104.740	105.254	49.1%40	33.6%62	19.0%32	31.3%54	48.3%60	67.1%42	17.5%54	29.1%48
DJ Rodman	1,414	761	65.0%	-4.938	105.944	110.938	49.8%42	35.2%68	19.6%28	31.8%56	50.7%48	63.6%28	18.7%62	35.5%30
Isaiah Collier	1,352	823	62.2%	-2.142	104.940	107.048	49.2%40	34.3%64	19.1%32	30.2%50	47.7%62	65.2%34	16.4%46	30.7%44
Joshua Morgan	1,022	1,153	47.0%	-1.344	107.446	108.744	50.2%46	33.6%62	18.3%38	35.4%64	51.6%44	65.9%36	19.3%66	27.2%54
Vince Iwuchukwu	796	1,379	36.6%	4.754	112.660	108.046	53.9%64	30.9%52	17.0%46	34.2%62	50.4%48	62.2%24	20.8%76	34.2%34
Bronny James	772	1,402	35.5%	2.852	111.156	108.346	53.3%60	32.9%58	18.7%34	36.4%66	49.9%54	63.5%28	19.1%64	31.6%42
Oziyah Sellers	742	1,432	34.1%	3.252	111.456	108.246	53.2%60	30.4%48	16.4%50	33.1%58	51.9%42	63.5%28	21.4%78	30.8%44
Harrison Hornery	598	1,576	27.5%	1.950	109.652	107.846	52.6%58	32.1%56	18.0%40	32.1%56	50.6%48	64.2%30	19.6%68	29.0%48
Kijani Wright	533	1,642	24.5%	-2.242	108.048	110.240	52.6%58	31.0%52	18.8%34	33.5%60	52.1%42	65.8%36	18.9%64	32.6%38
Arrinten Page	470	1,705	21.6%	1.148	110.254	109.144	52.2%56	31.6%54	17.1%44	32.7%58	51.7%42	64.5%32	19.7%68	31.6%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.