Utah Valley14-16

WACCoach: Todd Phillips

14-16NET#173

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tanner Toolson	1,188	515	69.7%	−0.748	+2.764	+3.432	+0.456	−5.212	−4.896	−3.632	−2.676	−9.22	−2.120	+2.734
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	1,178	526	69.1%	−1.944	−0.248	+1.740	−0.150	−0.646	−0.964	−7.216	+2.624	−0.050	+0.356	−4.172
Drake Allen	1,154	550	67.7%	−10.118	+0.552	+10.68	−2.328	+7.296	−0.352	+2.264	+2.028	−4.912	−2.120	+0.148
Jaden McClanahan	1,100	604	64.6%	−7.924	−4.130	+3.830	−3.518	−1.042	−0.556	−2.340	+2.722	+1.162	+0.254	+4.724
Trevin Dorius	1,009	695	59.2%	+8.178	+5.980	−2.260	+0.152	+6.694	−1.570	−6.518	−3.784	+0.960	−4.16	−13.696
Ethan Potter	645	1,059	37.9%	+13.090	+5.678	−7.382	+2.878	+4.586	−0.758	−8.214	−5.492	+3.178	−0.248	+0.744
Osiris Grady	606	1,098	35.5%	−5.730	−0.050	+5.720	+1.162	−3.026	−0.150	+3.572	+5.66	−2.628	+1.676	−3.970
Nate Tshimanga	572	1,131	33.6%	+12.388	−3.134	−15.496	+3.584	−1.638	+5.52	+8.290	−6.194	+2.372	+4.196	+4.624
Trevan Leonhardt	533	1,171	31.3%	+7.778	−2.040	−9.790	−0.842	+0.354	+3.012	+7.888	+0.940	+3.280	+7.5100	+1.540
K'mani Doughty	502	1,201	29.5%	−19.06	−5.624	+13.54	−1.238	−7.76	+0.540	+8.490	+6.34	+4.890	−5.52	+6.916

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tanner Toolson	1,188	515	69.7%	-4.440	100.932	105.452	47.0%32	29.4%46	17.1%46	36.1%66	48.5%58	65.6%36	18.4%60	36.8%28
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	1,178	526	69.1%	-4.838	100.030	104.854	46.8%30	30.7%50	18.3%38	34.9%64	50.1%50	68.1%46	19.1%64	34.7%32
Drake Allen	1,154	550	67.7%	-7.434	100.230	107.746	46.1%28	33.1%58	18.5%36	37.8%70	49.8%54	66.5%38	18.4%60	36.0%30
Jaden McClanahan	1,100	604	64.6%	-7.034	98.626	105.652	45.6%26	30.6%50	18.4%36	36.3%66	50.2%48	68.5%48	19.1%64	37.7%26
Trevin Dorius	1,009	695	59.2%	-0.944	102.534	103.458	46.9%32	33.6%62	17.9%40	34.6%62	47.8%62	68.4%48	17.4%52	30.8%44
Ethan Potter	645	1,059	37.9%	3.854	103.638	99.866	48.5%38	33.7%64	18.1%38	32.2%56	45.9%70	69.9%54	18.9%64	36.4%28
Osiris Grady	606	1,098	35.5%	-7.934	100.130	108.046	47.6%34	28.9%42	18.5%36	39.4%72	52.9%38	66.4%38	20.1%70	33.5%34
Nate Tshimanga	572	1,131	33.6%	3.854	98.026	94.278	49.2%40	29.9%46	22.2%16	42.8%78	45.1%74	69.6%54	21.7%80	39.1%22
Trevan Leonhardt	533	1,171	31.3%	1.048	98.726	97.772	46.3%28	31.1%52	20.6%22	42.6%78	49.9%54	70.4%56	24.1%88	37.1%26
K'mani Doughty	502	1,201	29.5%	-17.620	96.222	113.832	46.0%28	25.4%28	18.9%34	43.2%80	53.7%34	71.6%62	15.2%38	40.9%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tanner Toolson	1,188	515	69.7%	-3.740	98.226	101.962	46.6%30	34.6%66	21.9%18	39.7%74	51.1%46	74.8%74	20.5%74	34.1%34
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	1,178	526	69.1%	-2.942	100.230	103.158	46.9%32	31.4%52	19.2%32	42.2%78	47.5%64	68.1%46	18.8%64	38.8%24
Drake Allen	1,154	550	67.7%	2.752	99.728	97.072	48.4%38	25.9%30	18.7%34	35.6%64	47.9%62	71.4%60	20.4%74	36.0%30
Jaden McClanahan	1,100	604	64.6%	0.848	102.736	101.962	49.1%40	31.6%54	18.9%34	38.6%70	47.5%64	67.4%44	18.9%64	33.0%36
Trevin Dorius	1,009	695	59.2%	-9.032	96.624	105.652	46.8%30	27.0%34	19.4%30	41.1%76	51.6%44	67.6%44	21.5%78	44.4%16
Ethan Potter	645	1,059	37.9%	-9.132	97.926	107.148	45.7%26	29.2%44	18.8%34	40.3%74	51.3%46	66.9%42	19.1%64	35.7%30
Osiris Grady	606	1,098	35.5%	-2.242	100.130	102.360	46.5%30	31.9%56	18.6%36	35.9%66	47.3%64	69.0%50	18.4%60	37.4%26
Nate Tshimanga	572	1,131	33.6%	-8.432	101.132	109.542	45.8%26	31.4%54	16.7%48	34.5%62	51.2%46	67.3%42	17.6%54	34.5%34
Trevan Leonhardt	533	1,171	31.3%	-6.636	100.732	107.448	47.1%32	30.8%52	17.6%42	34.8%64	49.0%56	67.2%42	16.7%48	35.5%30
K'mani Doughty	502	1,201	29.5%	1.448	101.734	100.366	47.2%32	33.1%58	18.4%36	34.8%64	47.4%64	66.8%42	20.6%74	34.0%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.