Utah22-15

Pac 12Coach: Craig Smith

22-15NET#37

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gabe Madsen	1,982	438	81.9%	+3.364	+2.866	−0.552	+1.768	−4.118	−2.986	−1.046	−1.868	−4.812	+0.560	−4.372
Branden Carlson	1,741	678	72.0%	+1.154	+2.664	+1.542	+4.288	−7.36	−2.986	−8.812	−2.170	−4.216	−0.838	+1.142
Cole Bajema	1,697	723	70.1%	−6.328	+2.162	+8.412	+1.162	+0.254	−1.064	−2.836	+5.28	+3.480	−1.430	+0.048
Deivon Smith	1,338	1,081	55.3%	+0.954	+1.458	+0.646	+3.080	−7.26	−2.482	−2.340	−0.556	+0.454	−0.642	+3.630
Hunter Erickson	1,136	1,284	46.9%	−8.522	−4.726	+3.730	−3.220	+1.464	+2.318	+3.874	+1.138	−0.942	−0.642	+4.724
Ben Carlson	1,046	1,373	43.2%	−9.022	−2.438	+6.618	−3.718	+3.882	+1.428	+8.690	+4.810	−1.636	+1.270	+6.118
Lawson Lovering	990	1,430	40.9%	+7.778	−7.716	−15.496	−1.436	−5.910	+0.244	−5.124	−6.494	+6.696	−0.444	−9.690
Keba Keita	868	1,551	35.9%	+3.062	+5.778	+2.734	+1.062	+6.994	+0.442	+1.962	−0.150	−2.824	−0.544	−1.558
Rollie Worster	800	1,620	33.1%	+7.878	+0.352	−7.584	−1.930	+3.076	−0.150	+2.868	−2.372	−0.644	+2.584	−2.966
Jake Wahlin	190	2,229	7.9%	+2.158	−2.538	−4.674	−0.546	+6.594	+4.56	−2.438	+0.444	+10.2100	−2.714	−10.492
Luka Tarlac	166	2,253	6.9%	−11.016	+4.574	+15.52	+2.172	+8.298	+4.46	+7.186	+9.00	+0.960	−0.150	+8.710
Jayden Teat	114	2,306	4.7%	+5.772	+3.066	−2.764	−2.130	+12.4100	+3.110	−3.036	−2.676	−4.216	+2.282	+8.112

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gabe Madsen	1,982	438	81.9%	9.162	113.662	104.556	54.5%66	31.0%52	15.8%54	26.8%40	48.5%58	70.7%58	14.7%34	24.2%64
Branden Carlson	1,741	678	72.0%	8.862	113.862	105.054	55.4%70	29.6%46	15.5%56	24.5%34	48.2%60	70.4%56	14.4%32	25.3%60
Cole Bajema	1,697	723	70.1%	6.658	113.762	107.148	54.5%66	31.8%54	16.0%52	26.1%38	50.4%48	72.7%66	14.2%32	25.0%60
Deivon Smith	1,338	1,081	55.3%	8.962	113.762	104.854	55.5%70	28.5%40	15.2%58	25.9%38	48.6%58	71.7%62	14.4%32	26.6%56
Hunter Erickson	1,136	1,284	46.9%	4.054	110.654	106.550	52.5%56	32.5%58	17.5%42	29.0%48	49.4%54	71.0%60	14.3%32	27.5%54
Ben Carlson	1,046	1,373	43.2%	3.452	111.758	108.346	52.1%56	33.8%64	17.1%44	31.9%56	51.5%44	70.6%58	15.3%38	28.5%50
Lawson Lovering	990	1,430	40.9%	13.170	108.550	95.476	53.4%60	28.2%40	16.5%50	23.9%32	45.0%74	75.4%78	14.4%32	19.4%78
Keba Keita	868	1,551	35.9%	10.464	116.870	106.350	54.8%68	36.1%72	16.6%48	28.1%46	48.7%58	69.7%54	14.3%32	24.1%64
Rollie Worster	800	1,620	33.1%	13.870	113.360	99.568	52.9%58	33.8%64	16.3%52	28.8%48	47.3%64	71.1%60	16.3%46	23.1%68
Jake Wahlin	190	2,229	7.9%	10.464	110.854	100.366	53.7%62	37.7%78	20.5%24	24.7%34	49.2%56	80.9%92	12.2%20	15.5%88
Luka Tarlac	166	2,253	6.9%	-1.744	117.370	118.922	56.2%72	39.4%82	20.4%24	33.6%60	57.1%20	72.3%66	14.6%34	33.1%36
Jayden Teat	114	2,306	4.7%	14.070	116.068	102.062	52.2%56	43.4%90	19.3%30	24.1%32	46.3%68	67.6%44	16.7%48	32.7%38

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gabe Madsen	1,982	438	81.9%	5.856	110.854	105.054	52.8%58	35.0%68	18.7%34	27.7%44	50.2%48	75.5%78	14.2%32	28.5%50
Branden Carlson	1,741	678	72.0%	7.760	111.256	103.558	51.2%50	36.9%74	18.4%36	33.3%60	50.3%48	74.6%74	15.2%38	24.2%64
Cole Bajema	1,697	723	70.1%	12.968	111.658	98.768	53.4%62	31.6%54	17.0%46	28.9%48	45.2%74	69.2%52	15.6%40	25.0%62
Deivon Smith	1,338	1,081	55.3%	8.060	112.358	104.356	52.6%58	35.7%70	17.7%42	28.2%46	49.0%56	71.3%60	15.0%36	23.0%68
Hunter Erickson	1,136	1,284	46.9%	12.568	115.366	102.860	55.7%70	31.1%52	15.3%58	25.2%36	48.2%60	72.0%64	14.9%36	22.8%70
Ben Carlson	1,046	1,373	43.2%	12.468	114.162	101.762	55.8%70	30.0%48	15.7%54	23.3%30	46.7%66	72.2%64	14.1%30	22.4%70
Lawson Lovering	990	1,430	40.9%	5.456	116.368	110.838	54.7%66	34.1%64	16.2%52	29.0%48	51.4%44	68.7%48	14.8%36	28.9%48
Keba Keita	868	1,551	35.9%	7.560	111.056	103.658	53.8%64	29.2%44	16.2%52	26.3%38	48.8%56	72.6%66	14.8%36	25.6%60
Rollie Worster	800	1,620	33.1%	5.956	113.060	107.148	54.8%68	30.8%50	16.4%50	26.0%38	49.5%54	71.7%62	13.8%28	26.0%58
Jake Wahlin	190	2,229	7.9%	8.360	113.360	105.054	54.2%64	31.2%52	16.0%54	27.2%42	48.7%58	70.7%58	14.9%36	25.9%58
Luka Tarlac	166	2,253	6.9%	9.362	112.860	103.458	54.0%64	31.2%52	16.0%52	26.5%40	48.1%60	71.5%62	14.6%34	24.4%64
Jayden Teat	114	2,306	4.7%	8.260	112.960	104.754	54.3%64	31.1%52	16.2%52	27.1%42	48.9%56	71.7%62	14.5%32	24.6%62

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.