Poss2,074
Net Rtg-8.032
ORtg108.344
DRtg116.328
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,074 | 1,000 | -8.032 | 108.344 | 116.328 | 52.1%50 | 29.3%48 | 16.8%42 | 31.5%46 | 53.6%38 | 68.0%40 | 13.2%28 | 30.6%54 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. Dawes | 471 | 242 | -4.038 | 111.152 | 115.132 | 53.6%56 | 31.6%56 | 16.8%42 | 29.3%40 | 54.3%34 | 69.6%48 | 14.1%34 | 25.5%68 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesHayesJ. Hayes | 148 | 74 | -14.824 | 112.154 | 126.812 | 57.4%74 | 23.8%26 | 17.6%36 | 28.1%36 | 55.8%28 | 62.2%20 | 13.5%30 | 40.1%28 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesSandersK. Sanders | 89 | 35 | -2.042 | 123.178 | 125.114 | 54.1%58 | 26.8%38 | 13.5%66 | 91.8%100 | 56.9%24 | 65.8%32 | 13.9%34 | 52.3%12 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoDawesK. DawesSandersK. Sanders | 84 | 39 | -39.56 | 89.812 | 129.210 | 40.7%10 | 21.7%20 | 12.0%76 | 24.0%24 | 52.3%44 | 52.8%4 | 12.4%24 | 47.0%18 |
| McHenryD. McHenryDawesK. DawesHayesJ. HayesAbbeyO. AbbeySandersK. Sanders | 77 | 39 | 0.246 | 123.078 | 122.818 | 56.6%70 | 24.4%28 | 7.8%94 | 14.5%8 | 57.3%22 | 67.5%38 | 11.9%20 | 13.3%94 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoS. TraoreS. TraoreSandersK. Sanders | 76 | 39 | -40.36 | 87.210 | 127.610 | 39.9%8 | 23.9%26 | 14.5%60 | 20.3%16 | 59.7%16 | 73.0%64 | 9.4%10 | 32.8%46 |
| McHenryD. McHenryS. TraoreS. TraoreHayesJ. HayesAbbeyO. AbbeySandersK. Sanders | 46 | 20 | -31.510 | 102.932 | 134.46 | 54.3%58 | 20.0%14 | 17.5%36 | 40.0%66 | 65.8%6 | 77.8%80 | 10.8%16 | 39.5%30 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesPatrickJ. Patrick | 42 | 18 | 36.894 | 133.892 | 97.074 | 68.9%96 | 35.3%70 | 19.1%26 | 16.2%10 | 47.1%68 | 75.0%70 | 17.0%56 | 32.4%48 |
| BrownT. BrownS. TraoreS. TraoreHayesJ. HayesAbbeyO. AbbeySandersK. Sanders | 41 | 20 | 17.074 | 114.860 | 97.872 | 60.8%84 | 16.7%8 | 14.7%58 | 5.4%2 | 47.2%68 | 66.7%32 | 18.0%64 | 16.7%90 |
| BrownT. BrownOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesAbbeyO. Abbey | 41 | 20 | -5.936 | 102.832 | 108.746 | 44.0%16 | 46.2%96 | 19.6%22 | 14.3%8 | 50.0%58 | 72.0%58 | 7.1%4 | 16.3%90 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryS. TraoreS. TraoreHayesJ. HayesSandersK. Sanders | 38 | 19 | -6.134 | 138.896 | 144.90 | 68.2%96 | 40.0%84 | 13.1%70 | 39.4%64 | 68.4%2 | 50.0%2 | 9.5%10 | 44.7%20 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoDawesK. DawesPatrickJ. Patrick | 36 | 15 | 11.866 | 136.894 | 125.014 | 50.0%36 | 41.2%88 | 8.4%92 | 100.0%100 | 67.3%4 | 83.3%94 | 15.2%44 | 30.8%54 |
| BrownT. BrownS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesHayesJ. HayesAbbeyO. Abbey | 35 | 16 | -46.64 | 79.34 | 125.912 | 44.2%18 | 28.6%46 | 28.3%2 | 26.9%32 | 52.7%42 | 61.9%20 | 6.0%4 | 13.5%94 |
| BrownT. BrownS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesHayesJ. HayesSandersK. Sanders | 35 | 18 | 24.382 | 100.828 | 76.596 | 52.0%48 | 18.8%12 | 20.2%20 | 48.0%80 | 33.9%96 | 77.3%80 | 9.6%12 | 16.1%90 |
| BrownT. BrownOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoS. TraoreS. TraoreAbbeyO. AbbeySandersK. Sanders | 34 | 16 | -3.240 | 93.216 | 96.576 | 44.8%20 | 27.8%40 | 20.4%18 | 24.1%26 | 45.7%74 | 71.4%56 | 13.4%30 | 20.0%84 |
| BrownT. BrownMcHenryD. McHenryDawesK. DawesHayesJ. HayesSandersK. Sanders | 34 | 17 | 20.278 | 143.698 | 123.416 | 73.1%98 | 38.5%82 | 17.6%36 | 57.7%90 | 54.2%36 | 63.2%22 | 6.2%4 | 8.3%98 |
| McHenryD. McHenryOkonkwoJ. OkonkwoS. TraoreS. TraoreDawesK. DawesAbbeyO. Abbey | 33 | 15 | 7.358 | 111.052 | 103.858 | 47.1%26 | 31.8%58 | 9.0%90 | 20.6%18 | 48.2%64 | 94.4%100 | 3.1%2 | 28.6%58 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

