Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
ACC
Virginia Tech logo

Virginia Tech

19-13NET#57Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #77Coach: Mike Young
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Ben Hammond−2.9−1.9+1.0+0.5−5.0+0.0+3.8+1.1−5.3+5.0+6.7
Neoklis Avdalas+3.9−2.8−6.7−0.8−2.4+1.2+0.3−4.0+5.8−2.2−9.6
Amani Hansberry+8.1+9.2+1.1+3.3+1.5−1.0−3.0+2.4−0.3+0.7−7.8
Jaden Schutt+14.6+7.8−6.8+1.8+2.3−0.7+12.0−3.9−0.3+1.5+5.2
Jailen Bedford−23.2−1.6+21.6−2.5+3.5−0.7−5.6+10.6−0.3−5.1−0.0
Tobi Lawal−17.3−6.7+10.6−2.3−6.1+0.4+0.2+3.4−3.0−2.3+3.6
Christian Gurdak+9.5−4.8−14.2−4.1+4.9+1.2+0.8−6.9+1.4+1.9−0.2
Tyler Johnson+13.1+8.8−4.2+5.4+0.2−1.8−1.9−1.7−0.6+3.0+3.9
Antonio Dorn+2.6+3.7+1.1+3.9+0.1−1.3−14.7+2.0+10.0−4.9−6.3
Izaiah Pasha−8.6−13.5−4.9−2.3−3.1+3.7−0.0−2.1−3.0+2.8+0.4
Sin'Cere Jones−3.3−13.7−10.5−7.9+4.0+2.1+10.2−7.2−4.6+1.1+0.7

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Ben Hammond5.0112.6107.652.9%30.3%15.1%35.7%51.0%66.1%18.4%30.5%
Neoklis Avdalas6.7112.3105.652.6%30.9%15.4%34.9%49.7%68.8%16.6%26.5%
Amani Hansberry8.2115.9107.753.8%32.0%14.8%33.9%51.5%67.3%17.4%26.5%
Jaden Schutt11.3116.0104.753.5%32.4%14.8%39.5%49.2%67.3%17.8%31.0%
Jailen Bedford-3.5112.4115.951.8%32.9%14.8%32.6%54.9%67.3%15.1%28.9%
Tobi Lawal-2.7109.8112.451.6%28.6%15.3%34.9%52.3%65.9%16.1%30.6%
Christian Gurdak11.4110.298.850.3%34.4%15.8%35.3%46.6%68.2%18.3%28.8%
Tyler Johnson14.4118.9104.556.4%31.7%13.8%33.5%49.6%67.0%19.2%31.5%
Antonio Dorn7.9116.1108.356.0%31.6%14.0%22.5%52.4%75.9%13.1%23.5%
Izaiah Pasha-1.9101.1103.050.7%28.8%18.3%34.8%48.9%64.7%19.6%29.2%
Sin'Cere Jones2.7100.197.545.4%35.3%17.1%44.4%43.9%63.2%18.2%29.6%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Ben Hammond7.9114.5106.652.4%35.3%15.1%31.9%49.9%71.4%13.4%23.8%
Neoklis Avdalas2.8115.2112.453.4%33.3%14.1%34.6%53.8%63.0%18.8%36.1%
Amani Hansberry0.1106.7106.650.4%30.5%15.7%36.9%49.0%67.6%16.7%34.3%
Jaden Schutt-3.3108.2111.551.6%30.1%15.5%27.5%53.1%67.6%16.3%25.7%
Jailen Bedford19.6114.094.454.3%29.4%15.5%38.2%44.3%67.6%20.3%28.9%
Tobi Lawal14.7116.5101.953.9%34.7%14.9%34.7%48.9%68.9%18.4%27.0%
Christian Gurdak1.9114.9113.054.4%29.5%14.6%34.5%53.4%66.8%16.4%29.0%
Tyler Johnson1.3110.1108.850.9%31.5%15.7%35.4%51.3%67.6%16.2%27.6%
Antonio Dorn5.3112.5107.252.1%31.5%15.3%37.2%50.4%65.9%17.9%29.9%
Izaiah Pasha6.7114.6107.953.0%31.9%14.6%34.8%51.0%67.8%16.9%28.9%
Sin'Cere Jones5.9113.9108.053.2%31.3%14.9%34.2%51.2%67.7%17.1%28.9%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.