Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
ACC
Wake Forest logo

Wake Forest

21-11NET#74Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #58Coach: Steve Forbes
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Hunter Sallis+3.8+5.8+2.1+0.8+2.6−4.0−13.7−2.3−5.5−0.0+0.5
Tre'Von Spillers+9.4+11.1+1.7+2.9+9.2+0.8+0.3−4.2+1.4−5.0+8.8
Cameron Hildreth−1.8−4.4−2.6−2.8−3.6−1.3−9.3−1.4+4.9−1.4−0.7
Efton Reid III−2.0+4.8+6.9+1.8+1.5+0.2−1.0+2.3+0.2−2.0+1.7
Ty-Laur Johnson+1.0−3.5−4.5−2.3−2.0−0.8+4.3−0.5+3.2+2.1+5.2
Juke Harris+3.1−1.5−4.6−0.6−0.5+1.0+12.0−0.7−0.5+1.3−6.2
Parker Friedrichsen−4.5−0.5+4.0+0.5−1.7+0.1+8.8+1.2+0.9−2.4+3.0
Davin Cosby Jr.+2.1+4.0+1.9+3.7+0.9+0.5−8.5+0.7−7.1+1.1−8.2
Churchill Abass−9.7−12.1−2.4−5.4+1.7+1.8−9.2+2.7−8.1+8.8−3.7
Omaha Biliew+10.6+0.7−9.8+4.1−4.5−0.7−14.0−1.7+3.8+2.5−8.7

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Hunter Sallis3.6106.5103.049.8%27.9%16.1%35.6%47.7%66.7%19.3%31.2%
Tre'Von Spillers4.8107.8103.050.2%29.2%16.6%36.9%47.2%67.5%18.5%32.6%
Cameron Hildreth2.9105.2102.349.3%26.9%16.3%35.3%47.7%68.1%19.1%31.0%
Efton Reid III2.6107.3104.750.3%28.1%16.6%36.6%48.6%67.3%18.7%31.6%
Ty-Laur Johnson3.6104.4100.848.8%26.7%16.2%38.7%47.7%68.6%20.2%33.4%
Juke Harris4.9105.1100.249.4%27.3%17.1%43.6%47.5%67.0%20.0%27.8%
Parker Friedrichsen0.3105.6105.350.1%26.5%16.6%42.7%48.7%67.9%17.7%33.1%
Davin Cosby Jr.4.9109.2104.352.8%28.3%16.9%30.0%48.5%61.5%20.2%24.5%
Churchill Abass-5.794.9100.644.8%29.2%18.1%28.5%50.4%59.8%27.4%27.7%
Omaha Biliew12.9106.693.753.5%23.5%15.8%24.1%46.4%70.8%21.6%23.2%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Hunter Sallis-0.2100.7100.949.0%25.3%20.1%49.3%50.0%72.2%19.3%30.7%
Tre'Von Spillers-4.696.6101.347.4%20.0%15.8%36.6%51.5%66.0%23.5%23.7%
Cameron Hildreth4.7109.6104.952.1%30.6%17.6%44.6%49.0%63.3%20.5%31.7%
Efton Reid III4.7102.597.848.5%26.5%16.4%37.6%46.3%67.1%20.8%29.9%
Ty-Laur Johnson2.6108.0105.351.1%28.8%17.0%34.5%48.2%65.5%18.1%28.3%
Juke Harris1.7106.6104.950.0%27.9%16.0%31.6%48.2%67.5%18.7%34.0%
Parker Friedrichsen4.8106.1101.349.6%28.2%16.5%34.0%47.5%66.9%20.1%30.1%
Davin Cosby Jr.2.8105.2102.449.1%27.4%16.4%38.5%47.8%68.6%19.1%32.7%
Churchill Abass4.0106.9102.950.2%27.4%16.4%37.7%47.7%67.9%18.6%31.4%
Omaha Biliew2.3105.9103.549.4%28.0%16.6%38.1%48.1%66.9%19.1%31.8%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.