Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
WCC
Washington St. logo

Washington St.

19-15NET#134Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #91Coach: David Riley
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
LeJuan Watts−4.1+1.4+5.5+3.2−2.2+3.5+6.9+3.6−0.5+0.4−1.1
Ethan Price+2.2−1.1−3.2−2.7−4.6−3.3−7.0−4.8+2.2−1.5−0.5
Nate Calmese−13.9+4.5+18.4+1.8−1.4−2.0−3.1+7.3−4.7−0.7+4.2
Dane Erikstrup+22.6+7.9−14.7+4.9+2.0−2.2+1.0−3.0+1.1+2.8−8.1
Isaiah Watts−7.3−7.0+0.2−2.0−3.7−0.8+0.9−0.3−2.0−0.9+4.3
Tomas Thrastarson+1.1+0.9−0.2−0.8+1.6+0.8−2.2−2.8−1.1+0.4+1.5
ND Okafor−15.9−9.1+6.8−4.1+4.5+5.0−2.9+2.0+0.1−1.0+1.1
Kase Wynott−14.9−8.5+6.4−3.7−2.8−0.3+0.7+4.7−3.2+2.2+5.5
Parker Gerrits+15.6+4.1−11.5+1.4+1.3−0.5+0.2−3.5+2.0+1.5−2.4
Cedric Coward+19.0+9.2−9.8+2.5+5.7−0.7+8.0−3.8+7.7−2.4+2.4
Rihards Vavers−5.9+1.0+6.8+3.5+1.5+2.9−1.8+3.6−0.4−2.4−13.0

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
LeJuan Watts0.0113.2113.257.4%32.3%21.3%34.1%51.9%64.2%17.6%31.3%
Ethan Price1.3112.7111.456.2%31.8%19.9%31.2%50.2%64.7%17.2%31.4%
Nate Calmese-2.7114.0116.757.2%32.5%20.2%32.0%53.1%63.0%17.4%32.5%
Dane Erikstrup7.8115.3107.658.3%33.4%20.0%33.0%50.4%64.6%18.4%29.0%
Isaiah Watts-2.9109.4112.355.8%30.9%20.3%33.2%51.2%63.2%17.1%33.7%
Tomas Thrastarson1.4113.5112.056.3%33.7%21.1%31.4%49.7%63.6%17.7%32.3%
ND Okafor-10.3106.6116.953.9%35.9%24.1%30.7%52.7%64.3%16.8%32.3%
Kase Wynott-10.8106.3117.153.9%30.6%20.4%33.3%55.0%61.8%19.2%35.8%
Parker Gerrits13.3116.3102.958.0%33.8%20.3%32.9%48.5%65.8%18.7%29.5%
Cedric Coward16.8120.7103.958.9%37.7%20.0%39.4%48.1%70.7%15.5%33.5%
Rihards Vavers-4.3113.8118.159.9%34.1%23.2%31.1%54.4%63.9%15.4%20.2%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
LeJuan Watts4.2111.8107.654.2%34.5%17.7%27.2%48.4%64.6%17.2%32.4%
Ethan Price-0.9113.8114.658.9%36.4%23.2%38.1%55.0%62.5%18.7%31.9%
Nate Calmese11.2109.598.355.4%33.9%22.2%35.1%45.8%67.7%18.0%28.3%
Dane Erikstrup-14.8107.5122.253.4%31.4%22.2%32.0%53.3%63.5%15.6%37.1%
Isaiah Watts4.4116.4112.057.8%34.7%21.0%32.3%51.4%65.3%17.9%29.4%
Tomas Thrastarson0.3112.5112.257.2%32.1%20.3%33.7%52.5%64.8%17.3%30.9%
ND Okafor5.6115.7110.158.0%31.4%19.2%33.6%50.7%64.2%17.8%31.2%
Kase Wynott4.1114.8110.757.6%33.5%20.7%32.6%50.3%64.9%17.0%30.3%
Parker Gerrits-2.3112.1114.456.5%32.5%20.7%32.7%52.0%63.9%17.2%32.0%
Cedric Coward-2.2111.5113.756.4%31.9%20.8%31.4%51.9%63.0%17.9%31.1%
Rihards Vavers1.5112.8111.356.4%32.6%20.3%32.9%50.8%64.3%17.8%33.3%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.