Wisconsin27-10

Big 10Coach: Greg Gard

27-10NET#16

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Tonje	1,947	531	78.6%	+10.286	−1.444	−11.794	−0.248	−3.124	+1.034	+8.490	−3.180	+3.884	+1.778	−7.184
John Blackwell	1,939	538	78.3%	+17.396	+9.892	−7.584	+3.382	+2.676	−2.180	+3.672	−5.692	−1.140	−0.740	−6.180
Steven Crowl	1,571	907	63.4%	+0.150	+2.264	+2.136	+2.778	−1.636	+0.640	−0.252	+1.830	+5.494	−2.416	−3.568
Max Klesmit	1,549	929	62.5%	−6.128	+0.452	+6.518	+2.374	−4.614	+0.344	+0.656	+3.416	−0.546	+0.764	+4.226
Nolan Winter	1,338	1,140	54.0%	−6.228	−9.412	−3.268	−2.922	+0.656	+1.724	−14.04	−0.352	−1.140	+1.474	−8.388
Kamari McGee	1,331	1,147	53.7%	+5.672	+1.860	−3.870	−0.150	+2.070	−0.252	−2.140	−2.374	−0.050	+0.254	+2.834
Carter Gilmore	1,147	1,331	46.3%	+12.490	+4.274	−8.186	−0.842	−0.052	−2.584	+4.778	−2.272	+3.180	+1.272	−0.754
Jack Janicki	686	1,792	27.7%	−3.538	+2.364	+5.820	+0.252	+0.152	−0.658	+4.878	+2.524	−4.314	+1.068	+7.612
Xavier Amos	612	1,866	24.7%	−2.640	+0.754	+3.330	+1.972	−0.546	+0.934	+2.164	+0.444	−4.116	−0.446	−4.876
Markus Ilver	105	2,373	4.2%	−9.918	−3.532	+6.418	−9.12	+11.5100	−0.862	−3.332	−7.396	−10.92	−3.110	+21.60

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Tonje	1,947	531	78.6%	15.172	117.770	102.562	53.9%62	28.8%42	14.4%66	36.2%66	47.6%64	71.6%62	15.2%36	26.4%58
John Blackwell	1,939	538	78.3%	16.774	120.176	103.458	54.6%64	30.1%48	13.7%70	35.0%64	47.1%66	70.6%58	14.7%32	26.7%58
Steven Crowl	1,571	907	63.4%	13.068	118.872	105.852	54.9%66	28.9%42	14.4%66	34.2%62	48.9%58	72.9%68	13.9%28	26.7%58
Max Klesmit	1,549	929	62.5%	10.664	118.172	107.548	54.8%66	27.7%38	14.3%68	34.5%62	49.6%56	70.6%58	15.1%36	29.6%48
Nolan Winter	1,338	1,140	54.0%	10.164	113.660	103.558	52.6%56	29.8%46	15.0%62	28.0%44	48.1%62	70.3%56	15.5%38	24.1%66
Kamari McGee	1,331	1,147	53.7%	15.572	118.872	103.358	53.9%62	30.4%48	14.1%68	33.3%58	47.2%66	70.8%58	14.9%34	29.3%50
Carter Gilmore	1,147	1,331	46.3%	19.578	120.276	100.766	53.5%60	29.5%44	12.8%76	36.8%68	47.1%66	72.5%66	15.5%38	27.6%54
Jack Janicki	686	1,792	27.7%	10.464	119.674	109.244	54.1%62	29.6%44	13.7%70	37.8%70	50.1%50	67.7%44	15.5%38	33.5%38
Xavier Amos	612	1,866	24.7%	10.966	118.572	107.648	55.4%68	29.1%44	14.9%64	35.9%66	48.5%60	67.8%44	14.5%32	24.4%66
Markus Ilver	105	2,373	4.2%	3.554	114.662	111.138	45.3%24	40.3%82	13.4%74	31.1%54	41.3%86	60.5%18	11.8%16	48.5%12

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Tonje	1,947	531	78.6%	4.956	119.174	114.232	54.1%62	31.9%54	13.4%74	27.8%44	50.7%50	67.9%44	13.5%24	33.5%38
John Blackwell	1,939	538	78.3%	-0.646	110.352	110.940	51.3%50	27.5%36	15.8%56	31.5%54	52.7%40	71.7%62	15.3%36	32.8%40
Steven Crowl	1,571	907	63.4%	12.968	116.668	103.758	52.2%54	30.5%48	13.8%70	34.4%62	47.1%66	67.4%42	16.4%44	30.2%46
Max Klesmit	1,549	929	62.5%	16.774	117.870	101.066	52.5%54	32.3%56	14.0%70	33.9%60	46.2%70	71.2%60	14.4%30	25.4%62
Nolan Winter	1,338	1,140	54.0%	16.374	123.180	106.850	55.5%68	29.2%44	13.2%74	42.0%78	48.5%60	71.4%60	14.1%28	32.4%40
Kamari McGee	1,331	1,147	53.7%	9.964	117.068	107.150	54.0%62	28.4%40	14.3%68	35.4%64	49.5%56	70.9%60	14.7%32	26.5%58
Carter Gilmore	1,147	1,331	46.3%	7.260	116.066	108.944	54.3%64	29.5%44	15.3%60	32.1%56	49.3%56	69.4%52	14.2%30	28.3%52
Jack Janicki	686	1,792	27.7%	13.970	117.370	103.558	53.8%62	29.5%44	14.3%66	32.9%58	47.6%64	72.0%64	14.5%32	25.9%60
Xavier Amos	612	1,866	24.7%	13.570	117.870	104.356	53.4%60	29.6%44	13.9%70	33.7%60	48.2%62	71.9%64	14.9%34	29.2%50
Markus Ilver	105	2,373	4.2%	13.370	118.172	104.856	54.4%64	28.8%42	14.2%68	34.4%62	48.6%60	71.4%60	14.9%34	27.0%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.