Wisconsin24-11

Big 10Coach: Greg Gard

24-11NET#30

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Blackwell	1,839	436	80.8%	+0.050	+2.666	+2.634	−1.534	−2.330	−2.180	+1.560	+0.346	−1.040	−2.812	−6.280
Nick Boyd	1,789	486	78.6%	+2.962	+6.384	+3.430	−0.742	+3.684	−2.282	+0.354	+0.840	−4.016	−1.526	−10.292
Nolan Winter	1,523	752	67.0%	+13.792	+4.776	−9.090	−0.348	+2.072	−1.776	+8.790	−3.884	+3.786	+0.356	−0.150
Andrew Rohde	1,441	835	63.3%	−3.538	−0.548	+3.032	+0.456	−0.052	+0.934	−5.024	+2.324	+0.556	−0.738	−2.162
Aleksas Bieliauskas	1,125	1,150	49.5%	−3.238	+1.358	+4.524	+1.568	+1.970	+1.526	−6.518	+0.938	−0.842	−3.38	−12.496
Austin Rapp	1,118	1,157	49.1%	+8.882	+1.862	−7.084	−1.138	+0.152	−2.788	−7.914	+0.742	+3.684	+3.192	−3.770
Braeden Carrington	976	1,299	42.9%	−8.820	+4.576	+13.42	+1.970	+1.970	+0.246	+5.882	+4.212	−6.76	−0.444	+5.620
Jack Janicki	666	1,609	29.3%	+2.762	−9.012	−11.794	−2.922	−3.222	+0.638	+5.782	−5.190	+6.696	+0.762	+9.28
Hayden Jones	326	1,949	14.3%	−10.118	−7.716	+2.434	+0.556	−3.024	+1.722	−3.234	+1.334	−1.634	+3.192	+15.42
Will Garlock	323	1,952	14.2%	−6.128	−1.144	+5.022	+3.080	−4.316	+1.524	+1.660	+3.416	+1.768	+0.560	+9.010
Zach Kinziger	133	2,142	5.9%	+2.862	−11.58	−14.396	−2.326	−2.826	+2.118	−0.350	−6.094	+6.396	+3.494	+11.36

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Blackwell	1,839	436	80.8%	9.162	119.572	110.442	54.0%58	28.8%46	11.9%78	31.4%44	51.3%48	71.2%54	13.3%30	28.9%58
Nick Boyd	1,789	486	78.6%	9.762	120.474	110.742	54.2%58	30.1%52	11.8%78	31.1%44	51.4%48	70.5%52	13.5%30	28.0%60
Nolan Winter	1,523	752	67.0%	13.768	120.674	106.952	54.2%58	30.0%50	11.7%78	34.0%52	50.0%58	72.6%62	13.9%34	30.0%54
Andrew Rohde	1,441	835	63.3%	7.860	118.870	111.142	54.5%60	29.3%48	12.6%72	29.3%40	52.1%44	71.5%58	13.6%30	29.3%56
Aleksas Bieliauskas	1,125	1,150	49.5%	7.558	119.772	112.238	55.1%62	30.2%52	13.1%70	27.8%36	51.7%46	71.0%54	12.2%22	24.1%72
Austin Rapp	1,118	1,157	49.1%	13.668	119.972	106.452	53.8%56	29.3%48	10.9%82	27.2%34	51.6%48	73.2%64	15.4%44	28.1%60
Braeden Carrington	976	1,299	42.9%	3.952	121.676	117.726	55.4%64	30.4%52	12.4%74	34.5%54	53.7%38	67.4%38	13.6%30	33.3%46
Jack Janicki	666	1,609	29.3%	10.964	112.756	101.864	52.3%50	27.1%38	12.8%72	35.2%54	47.6%66	75.9%74	14.3%36	36.6%38
Hayden Jones	326	1,949	14.3%	0.546	112.454	112.040	54.7%62	26.7%38	13.8%66	28.3%38	52.4%44	69.9%48	16.5%52	43.4%22
Will Garlock	323	1,952	14.2%	3.952	118.068	114.234	56.9%70	25.6%32	13.6%66	32.5%48	54.2%36	72.8%62	14.3%36	37.8%34
Zach Kinziger	133	2,142	5.9%	11.666	108.244	96.574	52.1%50	26.7%36	14.3%62	30.8%44	45.6%74	77.2%78	17.0%56	40.7%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Blackwell	1,839	436	80.8%	9.162	116.966	107.948	55.5%64	31.2%54	14.0%64	29.9%40	51.1%50	72.1%60	16.1%50	35.1%40
Nick Boyd	1,789	486	78.6%	6.858	114.058	107.350	54.9%62	26.4%36	14.0%64	30.9%44	50.6%52	74.5%68	15.0%42	38.1%34
Nolan Winter	1,523	752	67.0%	0.046	115.964	115.930	54.5%60	28.0%42	13.4%68	25.3%28	53.8%38	68.9%44	13.6%32	30.1%54
Andrew Rohde	1,441	835	63.3%	11.364	119.372	108.148	54.0%58	29.3%48	11.7%78	34.2%52	49.8%58	71.0%54	14.3%36	31.4%50
Aleksas Bieliauskas	1,125	1,150	49.5%	10.764	118.470	107.750	53.5%56	28.4%44	11.6%80	34.4%52	50.8%52	71.8%58	15.4%44	36.5%38
Austin Rapp	1,118	1,157	49.1%	4.854	118.168	113.436	54.9%62	29.2%48	13.7%66	35.1%54	51.0%50	69.7%48	12.3%24	31.8%50
Braeden Carrington	976	1,299	42.9%	12.868	117.166	104.358	53.5%56	28.5%44	12.2%76	28.6%38	49.5%58	74.1%68	14.0%34	27.7%62
Jack Janicki	666	1,609	29.3%	8.260	121.676	113.536	55.1%62	30.2%52	12.1%76	29.5%40	52.7%42	69.3%46	13.6%32	27.4%62
Hayden Jones	326	1,949	14.3%	10.564	120.172	109.644	54.2%58	29.7%50	12.1%76	31.5%46	51.1%50	71.6%58	13.4%30	28.0%60
Will Garlock	323	1,952	14.2%	10.062	119.270	109.246	53.9%58	29.9%50	12.1%76	30.9%44	50.8%52	71.1%54	13.8%32	28.8%58
Zach Kinziger	133	2,142	5.9%	8.962	119.772	110.842	54.4%60	29.5%48	12.2%76	31.1%44	51.6%48	70.9%54	13.6%30	29.4%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.