Wright St.21-12

HorizonCoach: Clint Sargent

21-12NET#133

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominic Pangonis	1,553	725	68.2%	+8.982	+6.784	−2.262	+3.786	+2.878	+1.526	+6.884	−1.768	−0.644	−1.724	−6.280
Solomon Callaghan	1,551	727	68.1%	−20.34	−6.420	+13.92	−2.724	−3.520	+0.146	+0.154	+7.02	−1.732	−2.612	+1.242
TJ Burch	1,458	820	64.0%	+0.954	−5.224	−6.082	−3.518	−0.052	−0.760	+4.174	−1.870	−3.320	+5.4100	+3.828
Michael Imariagbe	1,343	935	58.9%	+9.184	+7.086	−2.160	+3.988	+3.684	+0.048	+1.760	+0.544	+2.374	−0.444	−0.754
Kellen Pickett	1,316	962	57.8%	+6.474	+1.860	−4.674	−1.238	+4.990	+1.920	+9.092	−2.272	+3.484	−0.738	−1.860
Michael Cooper	1,309	969	57.5%	+0.552	+7.386	+6.814	+1.364	−1.140	−3.392	+4.374	+2.622	+2.172	−2.812	+0.448
Logan Woods	1,028	1,250	45.1%	−0.350	+0.152	+0.448	+0.456	−2.132	−0.558	−4.228	−2.474	−1.238	−1.526	+6.914
Andrea Holden	796	1,482	34.9%	−4.036	−11.38	−7.386	−5.48	+0.456	+1.426	−9.78	−4.690	−3.122	+2.488	−4.072
Sam Alamutu	613	1,665	26.9%	−3.438	−0.250	+3.230	−0.346	−0.448	−2.080	−6.320	+5.08	+4.790	+1.374	−0.452
Bryan Etumnu	260	2,018	11.4%	−5.730	−10.510	−4.874	−0.644	−9.32	+1.822	−17.92	−3.582	−5.110	+1.678	−0.654
Alex Bruskotter	165	2,113	7.2%	+10.486	+12.296	+1.838	+13.9100	−4.216	+2.910	+2.164	+0.642	+1.364	+0.866	−1.056

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominic Pangonis	1,553	725	68.2%	9.262	117.768	108.548	55.6%64	33.7%66	16.6%42	39.6%64	51.9%46	70.4%52	16.1%50	31.3%52
Solomon Callaghan	1,551	727	68.1%	-0.246	113.558	113.734	53.5%56	31.8%58	16.2%46	37.4%60	54.7%34	70.0%50	15.8%48	33.6%44
TJ Burch	1,458	820	64.0%	6.758	113.758	107.050	53.1%54	32.8%62	15.9%48	38.8%64	51.7%46	69.4%46	18.6%68	34.7%42
Michael Imariagbe	1,343	935	58.9%	10.164	118.470	108.348	55.9%66	34.3%68	16.2%46	38.0%62	52.6%42	71.5%58	16.5%52	32.9%46
Kellen Pickett	1,316	962	57.8%	9.162	116.364	107.250	53.8%58	34.9%68	16.9%40	41.2%68	51.5%48	72.0%60	16.3%52	32.5%48
Michael Cooper	1,309	969	57.5%	6.556	118.670	112.138	54.9%62	32.3%60	14.7%58	39.2%64	53.5%38	71.5%58	15.5%44	33.4%44
Logan Woods	1,028	1,250	45.1%	6.256	115.662	109.444	54.6%60	31.6%58	15.9%48	35.1%54	51.1%50	70.0%48	15.8%48	37.0%36
Andrea Holden	796	1,482	34.9%	3.852	108.244	104.456	50.9%42	33.1%62	17.1%38	31.2%44	49.4%58	68.7%44	18.2%64	30.6%54
Sam Alamutu	613	1,665	26.9%	3.952	115.462	111.540	54.1%58	32.6%60	14.7%58	32.8%48	56.1%28	74.1%68	17.6%60	32.9%46
Bryan Etumnu	260	2,018	11.4%	1.348	106.238	104.956	53.8%56	24.6%28	17.7%34	21.5%20	49.3%58	66.2%32	18.1%64	32.7%46
Alex Bruskotter	165	2,113	7.2%	16.072	126.884	110.942	67.3%96	28.8%46	18.8%28	39.4%64	53.0%40	71.8%58	17.3%60	32.3%48

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominic Pangonis	1,553	725	68.2%	0.346	111.050	110.742	51.8%48	31.0%54	15.2%54	32.8%48	53.6%38	71.0%54	17.8%62	37.5%34
Solomon Callaghan	1,551	727	68.1%	20.178	119.972	99.868	56.2%68	35.3%70	16.1%48	37.3%60	47.6%66	71.7%58	18.4%66	32.4%48
TJ Burch	1,458	820	64.0%	5.856	118.870	113.136	56.6%70	32.8%62	16.6%44	34.8%54	53.6%38	72.7%62	13.2%28	30.9%52
Michael Imariagbe	1,343	935	58.9%	1.048	111.452	110.442	52.0%50	30.7%52	16.1%46	36.4%58	52.1%44	69.3%46	16.9%56	33.7%44
Kellen Pickett	1,316	962	57.8%	2.750	114.560	111.840	55.0%62	30.0%50	15.1%56	32.3%48	53.7%38	68.6%44	17.0%56	34.3%44
Michael Cooper	1,309	969	57.5%	6.156	111.452	105.354	53.6%56	33.5%66	18.1%32	34.9%54	50.9%50	69.4%46	18.2%64	33.0%46
Logan Woods	1,028	1,250	45.1%	6.556	115.562	109.046	54.1%58	33.8%66	16.4%44	39.3%64	53.5%38	71.2%54	17.3%60	30.1%54
Andrea Holden	796	1,482	34.9%	7.760	119.572	111.740	56.3%68	32.7%60	15.6%50	40.8%68	54.1%36	71.7%58	15.8%48	34.7%42
Sam Alamutu	613	1,665	26.9%	7.358	115.662	108.348	54.4%60	32.9%62	16.7%42	39.1%64	51.1%50	69.4%46	16.3%50	33.4%44
Bryan Etumnu	260	2,018	11.4%	7.058	116.766	109.744	54.4%60	33.9%66	16.0%48	39.4%64	52.8%42	71.3%54	16.4%52	33.3%46
Alex Bruskotter	165	2,113	7.2%	5.656	114.760	109.146	53.4%56	33.0%62	15.9%48	37.2%60	52.4%44	70.5%52	16.6%54	33.3%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.