Akron26-7

MACCoach: John Groce

26-7NET#95

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nate Johnson	1,638	491	76.9%	+8.782	+6.382	−2.462	+3.988	+0.858	+0.542	+4.476	+1.732	+2.878	+2.182	−4.674
Tavari Johnson	1,349	780	63.3%	−4.834	+2.162	+6.916	+2.678	−2.032	−0.658	−3.830	+0.148	−5.98	−3.012	−3.770
Isaiah Gray	1,296	834	60.9%	+11.790	+4.676	−7.284	+2.476	+3.682	+0.836	+0.354	−1.364	+1.970	+3.794	−6.682
Shammah Scott	1,268	861	59.6%	−3.736	−2.140	+1.740	−1.536	−4.514	−1.368	+5.982	+0.248	+1.868	−0.444	+1.840
Amani Lyles	981	1,148	46.1%	−3.238	−0.548	+2.834	+1.466	−7.94	−2.988	−2.338	+0.346	−1.932	−2.118	+0.148
Seth Wilson	952	1,177	44.7%	−0.350	+2.666	+2.932	+1.466	+0.052	+0.442	−4.028	−0.554	+0.658	−1.922	+1.540
James Okonkwo	920	1,209	43.2%	+9.784	+1.158	−8.688	+0.354	+8.498	+2.614	−3.034	−1.162	+0.960	+1.880	−9.490
Bowen Hardman	844	1,285	39.7%	−9.820	−6.520	+3.330	−2.922	−4.714	−1.166	−5.024	+1.136	−3.122	−0.838	+2.932
Sharron Young	796	1,333	37.4%	+4.568	−1.344	−5.878	−2.426	+1.968	−0.354	+2.466	+0.542	+4.388	+3.594	+4.426
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	386	1,743	18.1%	−12.812	−14.34	−1.558	−7.34	+1.060	+3.38	+6.584	−4.388	+5.794	−3.012	+17.92
Josiah Harris	177	1,952	8.3%	+2.862	+15.4100	+12.54	+1.566	+12.6100	+0.344	+4.176	+2.524	−12.92	+0.458	+0.148

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nate Johnson	1,638	491	76.9%	13.770	119.874	106.152	56.8%74	34.2%64	16.8%48	28.4%44	50.3%50	69.1%50	18.1%58	31.8%42
Tavari Johnson	1,349	780	63.3%	9.864	119.174	109.244	56.8%74	33.2%58	16.5%50	26.0%38	49.9%54	66.3%38	16.5%46	31.5%42
Isaiah Gray	1,296	834	60.9%	16.274	120.176	103.958	56.8%74	35.5%68	17.0%46	27.5%42	49.4%56	69.2%50	19.0%64	30.3%46
Shammah Scott	1,268	861	59.6%	10.264	117.570	107.350	55.2%68	32.2%56	16.2%54	29.8%50	50.0%54	69.2%50	17.4%52	33.6%38
Amani Lyles	981	1,148	46.1%	9.964	118.172	108.146	56.6%74	29.7%46	15.1%62	26.1%38	50.1%50	67.4%42	16.5%46	32.9%40
Seth Wilson	952	1,177	44.7%	11.566	119.774	108.246	56.6%74	34.0%64	16.9%48	25.2%36	49.6%56	68.7%48	16.6%46	33.7%38
James Okonkwo	920	1,209	43.2%	17.276	119.072	101.864	56.0%70	38.7%78	18.2%38	25.7%36	49.2%56	68.9%50	18.6%60	27.6%56
Bowen Hardman	844	1,285	39.7%	5.756	114.462	108.746	54.1%62	31.3%52	16.0%54	24.4%32	50.6%50	66.5%38	17.1%50	34.6%36
Sharron Young	796	1,333	37.4%	14.470	117.570	103.160	54.3%64	35.2%68	16.5%50	28.9%46	50.2%50	71.2%60	19.8%68	35.6%32
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	386	1,743	18.1%	1.248	106.644	105.454	49.8%40	34.8%66	19.4%30	32.7%58	46.3%70	73.0%68	15.2%36	47.6%14
Josiah Harris	177	1,952	8.3%	14.370	132.492	118.224	57.2%76	45.5%94	17.0%46	31.1%54	52.1%42	56.8%12	18.0%56	32.9%40

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nate Johnson	1,638	491	76.9%	5.056	113.560	108.546	52.9%56	33.5%62	16.3%52	24.0%32	48.6%60	66.3%38	16.0%42	36.4%30
Tavari Johnson	1,349	780	63.3%	14.672	117.068	102.462	54.2%62	35.3%68	17.0%46	29.8%50	49.8%54	72.2%64	19.4%66	35.2%34
Isaiah Gray	1,296	834	60.9%	4.554	115.566	111.040	54.4%64	31.9%54	16.2%52	27.2%42	50.7%50	67.3%42	15.4%38	36.9%30
Shammah Scott	1,268	861	59.6%	13.970	119.574	105.754	56.7%74	36.7%72	17.4%44	23.9%30	49.8%54	67.4%42	17.9%56	31.8%42
Amani Lyles	981	1,148	46.1%	13.268	118.572	105.454	55.2%68	37.6%76	18.0%40	28.4%44	49.7%56	69.3%52	18.6%60	32.8%40
Seth Wilson	952	1,177	44.7%	11.866	117.268	105.354	55.2%68	34.0%62	16.5%50	29.2%46	50.1%50	68.2%46	18.5%60	32.2%42
James Okonkwo	920	1,209	43.2%	7.560	117.870	110.340	55.7%70	30.3%48	15.5%58	28.7%46	50.4%50	68.1%46	16.8%48	37.0%30
Bowen Hardman	844	1,285	39.7%	15.572	120.976	105.454	57.0%74	36.0%70	17.1%46	29.4%48	49.5%56	69.7%54	17.9%56	31.7%42
Sharron Young	796	1,333	37.4%	9.964	118.872	108.944	56.7%74	33.3%58	16.8%48	26.5%38	49.7%56	66.9%42	16.3%44	31.3%44
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	386	1,743	18.1%	14.070	120.976	106.950	57.1%74	33.8%62	16.1%54	26.2%38	50.7%50	67.3%42	18.2%58	29.6%48
Josiah Harris	177	1,952	8.3%	11.466	117.068	105.654	55.7%70	32.9%58	16.6%50	27.0%40	49.7%56	69.7%54	17.6%54	32.9%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.