Alabama A&M12-23

SWACCoach: Otis Hughley

12-23NET#324

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Omari Peek	586	222	72.5%	+15.694	+4.774	−10.992	−2.526	−0.250	−7.098	−18.22	−4.888	+1.666	−1.428	−26.198
Lorenzo Downey	508	300	62.9%	+3.664	−0.846	−4.372	−0.744	+6.494	+2.912	−0.946	−0.352	+0.858	+0.558	−16.998
Cameron Tucker	484	324	59.9%	+23.8100	+4.674	−19.298	+3.584	+0.858	+1.132	+2.162	−13.698	+1.464	−0.444	−8.688
EJ Williams	464	344	57.4%	+17.294	−3.334	−20.598	−2.228	+2.070	−0.556	−14.62	−9.498	+2.272	+3.190	−17.698
Dailin Smith	431	378	53.3%	−35.32	−15.44	+19.90	−6.46	−10.22	+1.032	+2.062	+10.30	−12.32	+2.484	+2.536
Darius Osborne	296	512	36.6%	+13.890	+2.464	−11.492	−0.446	+1.564	−3.490	−9.110	−3.180	+1.566	+3.392	−3.266
Caleb Blackwell	271	537	33.5%	+0.954	+10.594	+9.78	+6.596	+1.262	+0.934	+3.572	+5.38	−3.818	+1.066	+18.30
Jayland Randall	228	581	28.2%	−5.032	+2.262	+7.216	−0.248	+2.472	−0.656	+23.2100	+2.922	+8.498	−3.310	+26.50
AC Bryant	193	616	23.8%	−26.62	−10.110	+16.52	−6.46	−1.042	−1.774	−11.46	+7.72	+0.758	−2.616	+23.10
Eric Lee	147	661	18.2%	−16.48	−9.412	+7.016	−2.624	+0.556	+4.56	−1.344	+5.28	+6.494	−1.922	+14.02
Chad Moodie	146	662	18.0%	+10.584	+6.180	−4.572	+6.096	−0.648	+1.526	+4.978	−9.698	+4.388	−8.32	−2.764
London Riley	114	694	14.1%	+24.3100	+20.8100	−3.568	+11.0100	−5.412	−4.694	+24.2100	+0.148	−5.112	+5.8100	−2.160
William Tavares	114	695	14.1%	−20.44	−2.736	+17.70	−2.328	+7.096	+2.614	−5.224	+10.70	−9.32	+1.978	+9.210

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Omari Peek	586	222	72.5%	-19.320	95.120	114.330	44.0%20	33.8%64	22.2%16	34.7%62	53.6%34	65.5%36	17.0%50	28.9%48
Lorenzo Downey	508	300	62.9%	-22.416	93.518	115.928	44.3%22	36.0%72	25.2%8	38.8%72	54.7%30	65.4%34	17.6%54	29.8%46
Cameron Tucker	484	324	59.9%	-14.026	95.622	109.642	46.1%28	34.1%64	24.6%8	40.0%74	49.5%54	65.6%36	17.2%52	32.2%40
EJ Williams	464	344	57.4%	-16.322	92.418	108.744	43.7%20	34.6%66	23.9%10	33.2%58	51.0%46	65.9%36	18.7%62	28.3%50
Dailin Smith	431	378	53.3%	-40.06	86.610	126.612	41.5%14	29.0%42	24.6%8	40.1%74	59.6%14	59.1%16	18.5%62	36.6%28
Darius Osborne	296	512	36.6%	-14.824	95.320	110.140	44.4%22	34.7%66	22.0%18	33.6%60	52.8%38	66.0%36	19.5%68	33.5%34
Caleb Blackwell	271	537	33.5%	-23.116	100.832	123.814	49.0%40	34.6%66	24.7%8	41.5%76	58.4%16	62.5%24	18.1%58	48.0%12
Jayland Randall	228	581	28.2%	-27.212	95.322	122.616	44.4%22	35.5%70	23.7%10	56.1%92	57.0%20	71.2%60	15.0%38	55.3%6
AC Bryant	193	616	23.8%	-43.84	86.110	130.08	39.9%10	33.0%58	22.8%14	30.7%52	60.8%10	65.6%36	15.5%40	53.5%8
Eric Lee	147	661	18.2%	-37.08	86.110	123.116	42.5%16	34.2%64	27.8%4	38.1%70	59.1%14	70.4%56	15.9%42	47.1%12
Chad Moodie	146	662	18.0%	-15.024	98.826	113.832	49.5%42	33.3%62	25.4%6	43.2%80	47.2%64	68.5%48	10.6%14	33.3%34
London Riley	114	694	14.1%	-2.742	111.656	114.330	54.2%64	29.1%44	20.2%24	60.2%94	54.9%28	60.7%20	22.5%82	33.7%34
William Tavares	114	695	14.1%	-41.36	91.516	132.76	42.6%16	39.7%82	26.4%4	34.7%62	64.1%6	56.9%10	19.1%64	43.5%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Omari Peek	586	222	72.5%	-34.98	90.414	125.312	46.5%30	33.9%64	29.2%2	52.9%90	58.4%16	63.9%30	18.5%60	55.1%8
Lorenzo Downey	508	300	62.9%	-25.914	94.320	120.220	45.1%24	29.6%46	22.3%16	39.7%74	55.0%28	64.6%32	17.1%52	46.7%14
Cameron Tucker	484	324	59.9%	-37.86	91.016	128.98	42.5%16	33.3%62	23.5%12	37.9%70	63.1%8	64.2%30	17.7%56	40.7%20
EJ Williams	464	344	57.4%	-33.58	95.722	129.28	45.9%28	32.6%58	24.4%8	47.9%86	60.3%12	63.7%28	15.6%42	45.9%14
Dailin Smith	431	378	53.3%	-4.738	102.034	106.750	47.9%36	39.2%82	23.6%10	38.1%70	49.2%54	71.4%60	16.1%44	34.2%34
Darius Osborne	296	512	36.6%	-28.612	92.918	121.518	44.8%22	33.2%58	25.4%6	42.7%78	55.9%24	64.6%32	16.2%46	36.6%28
Caleb Blackwell	271	537	33.5%	-23.916	90.314	114.232	42.5%16	33.4%62	23.8%10	38.0%70	53.1%36	66.3%38	17.1%52	29.7%46
Jayland Randall	228	581	28.2%	-22.216	93.218	115.428	44.7%22	33.1%58	24.3%10	33.0%58	54.1%32	62.8%26	18.3%60	28.8%50
AC Bryant	193	616	23.8%	-17.322	96.222	113.532	46.2%28	34.1%64	24.5%8	42.1%78	53.1%36	64.9%34	18.0%58	30.4%44
Eric Lee	147	661	18.2%	-20.618	95.522	116.128	45.1%24	33.7%64	23.3%12	39.4%72	53.9%32	64.0%30	17.8%56	33.1%36
Chad Moodie	146	662	18.0%	-25.514	92.718	118.222	43.6%20	33.9%64	23.9%10	38.3%70	56.7%22	64.2%30	19.0%64	36.0%30
London Riley	114	694	14.1%	-27.014	90.916	117.924	43.2%18	34.5%64	24.8%8	36.0%66	54.8%28	65.8%36	16.7%48	35.8%30
William Tavares	114	695	14.1%	-20.818	94.220	115.030	45.0%24	32.7%58	23.8%10	39.9%74	53.4%36	66.1%38	17.2%52	34.3%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.