Alabama St.10-19

SWACCoach: Tony Madlock

10-19NET#313

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

TJ Madlock	1,261	305	80.5%	+18.696	−1.842	−20.498	−4.412	−8.14	−8.898	+1.258	−6.092	+13.8100	+1.270	+3.630
CJ Hines	1,060	507	67.7%	−13.912	−3.830	+10.18	−2.128	−0.844	−1.064	−2.438	+6.26	+0.456	−0.740	+14.32
Isaiah Range	1,020	547	65.1%	−12.414	−17.92	−5.576	−5.68	−6.48	+0.934	−9.012	+0.544	+7.898	+1.878	+1.340
Micah Octave	1,008	558	64.3%	+16.994	+11.394	−5.676	+1.466	+11.9100	+2.218	+7.488	+3.120	+1.364	+5.598	−1.256
Ubong Okon	767	799	49.0%	+23.4100	+6.582	−16.998	+2.476	+8.198	+0.738	−7.516	−8.998	+6.496	−0.838	−5.778
Sean Smith	562	1,004	35.9%	−2.740	−3.434	−0.652	+1.466	−0.150	+4.06	−3.234	−5.592	−5.012	−1.528	−1.154
Amarr Knox	533	1,034	34.0%	+26.9100	+28.5100	+1.640	+9.3100	+8.698	−1.368	+17.6100	−2.876	−3.024	−1.232	+8.610
Eric Coleman	459	1,107	29.3%	−10.418	−7.616	+2.834	−0.742	−5.910	−0.556	−5.124	−0.152	−4.614	−0.544	−6.280
JaSteven Walker	404	1,162	25.8%	−32.82	−15.94	+16.80	−4.314	−9.42	+0.836	−6.220	+7.02	−5.510	−3.112	−5.276
Kendal Parker	403	1,163	25.7%	−2.940	+5.880	+8.810	+3.584	+0.154	+0.934	+6.082	+3.220	−6.08	+0.964	+0.048
Darrell Reed	308	1,258	19.7%	−18.16	−6.918	+11.16	−3.022	−4.516	+0.146	+4.778	+3.318	−8.94	−2.516	−10.692

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

TJ Madlock	1,261	305	80.5%	-6.536	95.622	102.062	39.8%10	33.5%62	14.7%62	28.4%46	47.7%62	69.9%54	20.5%74	45.6%14
CJ Hines	1,060	507	67.7%	-14.724	94.720	109.442	40.0%10	34.8%66	16.1%52	27.4%42	51.2%46	67.1%42	20.1%70	49.8%10
Isaiah Range	1,020	547	65.1%	-14.424	89.714	104.156	38.7%8	32.9%58	16.8%48	25.1%36	49.2%56	70.0%54	20.9%76	45.3%14
Micah Octave	1,008	558	64.3%	-4.140	99.930	104.056	41.2%12	39.2%82	17.3%44	30.8%52	50.2%48	67.4%44	22.3%82	44.4%16
Ubong Okon	767	799	49.0%	2.050	99.228	97.372	41.9%14	39.1%82	16.8%46	24.5%34	44.5%76	70.0%54	19.9%70	41.9%18
Sean Smith	562	1,004	35.9%	-11.928	93.718	105.652	41.6%14	35.0%68	19.0%32	26.1%38	45.6%72	63.9%30	19.3%66	44.2%16
Amarr Knox	533	1,034	34.0%	7.660	114.764	107.148	46.9%30	40.9%86	15.6%56	40.0%74	47.2%64	65.0%34	19.5%68	50.5%10
Eric Coleman	459	1,107	29.3%	-17.522	90.616	108.046	40.1%10	30.9%52	16.1%52	24.6%34	48.9%56	63.8%28	19.9%70	40.5%20
JaSteven Walker	404	1,162	25.8%	-34.48	84.18	118.522	37.4%6	28.0%40	17.1%46	23.5%32	54.1%32	62.8%26	18.0%58	41.1%20
Kendal Parker	403	1,163	25.7%	-12.328	100.230	112.534	43.3%18	35.2%68	17.1%44	32.7%58	51.4%44	62.6%24	20.9%76	44.9%16
Darrell Reed	308	1,258	19.7%	-24.514	90.314	114.830	38.3%8	31.5%54	16.6%48	32.0%56	51.6%44	59.9%16	18.3%60	36.7%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

TJ Madlock	1,261	305	80.5%	-25.014	97.324	122.416	44.3%22	41.6%86	23.6%10	27.2%42	53.7%34	56.0%10	19.3%66	42.0%18
CJ Hines	1,060	507	67.7%	-0.844	98.526	99.368	42.1%16	35.6%70	17.2%44	29.9%50	45.0%74	66.7%38	20.7%74	35.5%30
Isaiah Range	1,020	547	65.1%	-2.042	107.646	109.642	44.3%22	39.3%82	15.9%54	34.0%62	48.7%58	62.2%24	19.1%64	44.0%16
Micah Octave	1,008	558	64.3%	-21.018	88.614	109.642	39.8%10	27.3%36	15.0%60	23.4%30	47.1%64	66.2%38	16.7%48	45.6%14
Ubong Okon	767	799	49.0%	-21.518	92.718	114.232	39.4%10	31.0%52	16.1%52	32.0%56	53.4%36	63.5%28	20.7%74	47.6%12
Sean Smith	562	1,004	35.9%	-9.132	97.124	106.250	40.2%10	35.1%68	15.0%60	29.3%48	51.1%46	68.9%50	20.8%76	45.3%14
Amarr Knox	533	1,034	34.0%	-19.320	86.210	105.552	37.6%8	32.3%56	16.9%46	22.3%28	50.0%54	68.0%46	20.7%74	41.9%18
Eric Coleman	459	1,107	29.3%	-7.134	98.126	105.254	40.9%12	36.8%74	16.6%48	29.7%50	49.1%56	68.4%48	20.4%72	46.8%14
JaSteven Walker	404	1,162	25.8%	-1.644	100.030	101.662	41.7%14	37.5%76	16.3%52	29.8%50	47.1%64	68.3%48	21.1%76	46.3%14
Kendal Parker	403	1,163	25.7%	-9.332	94.420	103.756	39.8%10	35.0%68	16.2%52	26.7%40	48.2%60	68.5%48	20.1%70	44.8%16
Darrell Reed	308	1,258	19.7%	-6.536	97.324	103.756	41.2%12	36.0%72	16.4%50	27.3%42	48.3%60	68.8%50	20.8%76	47.2%12

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.