Austin Peay12-19

ASUNCoach: Corey Gipson

12-19NET#287

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

LJ Thomas	1,384	559	71.2%	+6.376	+4.174	−2.362	−0.348	−4.814	−6.898	−7.214	−2.374	+1.868	−2.514	−2.464
Tate McCubbin	1,254	690	64.5%	+18.798	+13.998	−4.876	+7.098	−3.422	−2.684	+7.488	−0.150	+4.188	+1.372	−4.172
Quan Lax	1,219	725	62.7%	−5.232	−5.922	−0.752	−2.130	−2.232	+0.936	−5.222	−2.878	−2.526	−1.526	−2.564
Isaac Haney	1,197	747	61.6%	+1.658	−0.946	−2.564	+1.668	−1.934	+0.344	−0.648	+1.730	+3.684	+0.968	−2.062
Anton Brookshire	1,165	778	60.0%	−6.228	−6.320	−0.150	−1.634	−3.620	+1.132	−5.920	−2.778	−3.022	−2.218	−8.790
Tekao Carpenter	773	1,170	39.8%	−10.418	−8.014	+2.436	−4.712	−1.934	−2.078	−6.020	+1.236	−6.08	+2.486	+2.138
Sai Witt	760	1,184	39.1%	+14.794	+6.784	−8.086	+1.162	+11.5100	+4.54	+13.498	−3.382	+1.970	+0.560	−8.588
Hansel Enmanuel	527	1,416	27.1%	+5.572	+5.478	−0.150	+4.892	−2.926	+1.034	−1.246	+1.730	−1.636	+3.594	+7.912
Akili Evans	328	1,615	16.9%	−16.48	−15.34	+1.142	−8.92	+5.892	+3.96	−2.238	−2.272	−0.942	−2.118	+0.248
JaVar Daniel	261	1,682	13.4%	+21.8100	+11.996	−9.992	+3.786	+1.364	−5.096	−1.940	−1.768	+4.590	+3.996	+13.44
Daniel Loos	257	1,687	13.2%	−27.02	−15.44	+11.74	−2.922	−5.012	+4.24	−3.830	+7.02	+3.886	−3.38	+0.944
Darius Dawson	238	1,706	12.2%	−9.720	+0.352	+9.98	+0.858	+4.888	+2.020	+1.562	+5.94	+3.282	−2.020	+4.424
Me'Kell Burries	195	1,749	10.0%	−4.236	+9.994	+14.12	+1.668	+4.988	−1.876	+3.772	+3.516	+8.3100	−8.22	+7.314
Terrell Gaines	129	1,815	6.6%	−14.510	−7.516	+7.016	−6.46	+3.884	+4.72	+23.6100	+5.46	−17.12	+12.3100	+22.40

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

LJ Thomas	1,384	559	71.2%	-8.732	106.944	115.628	48.8%36	27.3%36	13.1%76	27.3%42	53.4%36	65.7%36	16.1%42	34.1%36
Tate McCubbin	1,254	690	64.5%	-3.940	110.652	114.532	51.4%50	27.4%36	14.1%68	31.9%56	54.0%34	66.8%42	17.3%52	33.3%38
Quan Lax	1,219	725	62.7%	-12.526	103.536	116.028	48.1%34	27.8%38	15.3%60	27.3%42	53.0%38	64.3%32	16.3%44	33.9%38
Isaac Haney	1,197	747	61.6%	-9.930	105.440	115.330	49.5%40	27.9%38	15.1%62	29.0%46	54.7%30	66.7%38	17.2%50	34.0%36
Anton Brookshire	1,165	778	60.0%	-13.026	103.234	116.228	48.2%34	27.2%36	15.4%58	26.9%40	53.0%38	64.1%30	16.0%42	31.4%44
Tekao Carpenter	773	1,170	39.8%	-16.822	100.830	117.724	46.1%26	27.6%36	13.8%70	25.7%36	54.7%30	61.6%22	18.3%58	36.0%32
Sai Witt	760	1,184	39.1%	-1.544	109.852	111.338	49.5%40	35.7%70	17.8%42	37.5%70	52.1%42	66.3%38	17.2%50	29.6%48
Hansel Enmanuel	527	1,416	27.1%	-6.536	109.650	116.128	52.4%54	26.5%32	15.7%56	28.4%44	55.3%28	64.0%30	19.4%66	40.6%22
Akili Evans	328	1,615	16.9%	-24.114	93.016	117.126	41.5%14	33.3%62	18.3%38	27.4%42	52.2%42	64.5%32	15.1%36	34.9%34
JaVar Daniel	261	1,682	13.4%	8.362	116.066	107.748	52.0%54	29.8%46	10.7%86	27.6%42	52.6%40	69.1%50	20.2%72	46.5%14
Daniel Loos	257	1,687	13.2%	-33.98	92.416	126.312	46.3%26	24.3%24	18.7%34	25.9%38	60.1%12	68.5%48	14.0%28	35.5%32
Darius Dawson	238	1,706	12.2%	-19.118	105.942	125.014	49.5%40	32.9%58	16.8%48	30.5%52	59.3%14	68.1%46	15.1%36	38.7%26
Me'Kell Burries	195	1,749	10.0%	-14.324	114.662	128.910	50.3%46	33.0%58	13.4%74	32.6%58	57.2%22	72.7%66	9.4%8	41.3%22
Terrell Gaines	129	1,815	6.6%	-24.114	98.726	122.816	42.9%16	32.1%56	19.4%30	51.4%88	59.1%16	49.2%4	28.4%96	55.9%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

LJ Thomas	1,384	559	71.2%	-15.024	102.834	117.824	49.0%38	32.1%56	19.8%26	34.5%62	55.7%26	63.9%30	18.6%60	36.5%30
Tate McCubbin	1,254	690	64.5%	-22.616	96.722	119.322	44.4%20	30.8%50	16.7%48	24.5%32	54.1%34	62.6%26	16.0%42	37.4%28
Quan Lax	1,219	725	62.7%	-7.234	109.450	116.726	50.2%46	30.0%46	14.5%66	32.5%58	55.9%26	66.9%42	17.8%56	36.3%30
Isaac Haney	1,197	747	61.6%	-11.528	106.242	117.824	47.8%32	29.8%46	14.9%64	29.6%48	53.0%38	63.0%26	16.3%44	36.0%32
Anton Brookshire	1,165	778	60.0%	-6.836	109.550	116.328	49.8%40	30.8%50	14.4%66	32.8%58	55.7%26	67.1%42	18.1%58	40.1%24
Tekao Carpenter	773	1,170	39.8%	-6.436	108.950	115.330	50.8%46	29.5%44	15.8%56	31.7%54	53.6%36	67.6%44	15.9%42	33.9%36
Sai Witt	760	1,184	39.1%	-16.222	103.134	119.322	48.4%34	24.2%24	13.3%74	24.1%32	55.3%28	64.5%32	16.7%46	38.1%28
Hansel Enmanuel	527	1,416	27.1%	-12.028	104.238	116.228	47.6%32	29.3%44	14.8%64	29.5%48	53.6%36	65.6%36	15.9%42	32.7%40
Akili Evans	328	1,615	16.9%	-7.834	108.348	116.028	50.4%46	27.6%36	14.4%66	29.6%48	54.4%32	65.4%36	17.2%50	34.7%34
JaVar Daniel	261	1,682	13.4%	-13.526	104.138	117.624	48.3%34	28.5%40	15.7%58	29.5%48	54.2%32	64.6%32	16.3%44	33.1%38
Daniel Loos	257	1,687	13.2%	-6.934	107.746	114.630	49.2%38	29.3%44	14.5%66	29.7%48	53.1%38	64.8%34	17.3%52	34.6%36
Darius Dawson	238	1,706	12.2%	-9.432	105.740	115.030	48.7%36	28.0%38	14.8%64	29.1%46	53.3%36	64.8%34	17.1%50	34.3%36
Me'Kell Burries	195	1,749	10.0%	-10.130	104.738	114.830	48.7%36	28.2%40	15.2%60	28.8%46	53.7%36	64.4%32	17.7%54	34.0%36
Terrell Gaines	129	1,815	6.6%	-9.630	106.242	115.828	49.2%38	28.4%40	14.7%64	27.8%44	53.7%34	66.3%38	16.1%42	33.5%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.