Schedule
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
WL
LL
LW
LLW
W
W
LL
LWWWLWLLWWLLLLWLLWWWLLTeam Stats
23 games- Net Rating-1.047
- Offensive Rating103.937
- Defensive Rating104.963
- Pace72.093
- Effective FG%51.3%71
- Off Rebound Pct27.8%50
- Turnover Pct19.9%55
- FT Attempt Rate28.7%30
Team Stats
23 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-1.047
- Offensive Rating103.937
- Defensive Rating104.963
- Pace72.093
- Effective FG%51.3%71
- Off Rebound Pct27.8%50
- Turnover Pct19.9%55
- FT Attempt Rate28.7%30
Results & Margin
- Win Pct43.5%40
- Point Margin / Game-0.747
- Points / Game74.779
- Points Allowed / Game75.518
- 1st Half Margin1.163
- 2nd Half Margin-1.928
- Avg Largest Lead11.263
- Avg Largest Deficit11.440
Box Score
- Points / Game74.779
- Rebounds / Game36.980
- Assists / Game13.869
- ORebs / Game10.058
- DRebs / Game26.984
- Steals / Game5.524
- Blocks / Game2.423
- Turnovers / Game14.328
- PFs / Game19.214
Shooting
- FGMs / Game26.780
- FGAs / Game60.278
- Field Goal Pct44.3%62
- 2PMs / Game18.255
- 2PAs / Game35.444
- 2-Point Pct51.4%71
- 3PMs / Game8.583
- 3PAs / Game24.885
- 3-Point Pct34.2%58
- FTMs / Game13.052
- FTAs / Game17.337
- Free Throw Pct75.1%85
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s48.6%29
- % Pts from 3s34.0%74
- % Pts from FTs17.3%34
- Paint Pts / Game15.030
- % Pts in Paint20.1%27
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.744
- % Pts on Fast Break6.3%39
- Points off TOVs / Game12.662
- % Pts off TOVs16.8%50
- 1st Half Pts / Game36.387
- 2nd Half Pts / Game37.360
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %55.1%71
- Points / Shot1.2460
- 3-Point Att Rate41.2%80
- Assist Pct51.9%52
- Assists / 100 Poss19.242
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.96x49
- PF Drawn / Game17.861
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%48.9%65
- Opp True Shooting %52.9%67
- Opp Field Goal Pct43.1%59
- Opp 2-Point Pct50.4%43
- Opp 3-Point Pct31.0%88
- Opp 3PA Rate37.9%43
- Opp FT Att Rate35.7%21
- Opp Points / Shot1.2255
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game75.518
- Paint Pts Allowed15.864
- Fast Break Pts Allowed4.858
- Pts off TOVs Allowed14.915
- Opp Assist Pct47.3%78
- TOVs Forced / Game12.536
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct69.5%23
- Turnovers Forced Pct17.4%14
- Steal Pct7.6%12
- Block Pct3.3%14
- Hakeem Pct10.9%7
- PF Efficiency1.08x25
- Steals / PF0.29x14
- Blocks / PF0.12x12
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 347 D-I teams- #41Opp 3P%31.0%
- #663PM Diff+28
- #96TS%54.7%
- #104eFG%51.3%
- #108PO TOV Diff-54
- #123Opp eFG%48.9%
- #137FB Pts %11.9%
- #141SOS1.0
Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
- #41Opp 3P%31.0%
- #663PM Diff+28
- #96TS%54.7%
- #104eFG%51.3%
- #108PO TOV Diff-54
- #123Opp eFG%48.9%
- #137FB Pts %11.9%
- #141SOS1.0
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
- #277Opp TOV%17.4%
- #269Opp OREB%30.5%
- #244FTAR28.7%
- #202TOV%19.9%
- #194REB Diff-19
- #186Pts Diff-17
- #182Paint Pts %38.3%
- #175OREB%27.8%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2020-21- 1
Quinnipiac 2021-2213-17MAACMost alike in Adj O, OREB%, FT rate91 - 2
UNC AshevilleUNCA 2014-1512-16Big SouthMost alike in 3PA rate, OREB%, eFG%89 - 3
Samford 2021-2218-11SouthernMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, eFG%88 - 4
Winthrop 2014-1516-13Big SouthMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, Adj D87 - 5
Marshall 2025-2618-13Sun BeltMost alike in Opp eFG%, Tempo, 3PA rate86 - 6
East Tennessee St.ETSU 2015-1622-12SouthernMost alike in FT rate, Adj O, TOV%84 - 7
MassachusettsUMass 2015-1614-18A10Most alike in Adj D, Opp eFG%, Tempo83 - 8
Western KentuckyWKU 2014-1518-12C-USAMost alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, OREB%83 - 9
California 2023-2413-19Pac 12Most alike in OREB%, Adj D, 3PA rate83 - 10
Fordham 2024-2511-21A10Most alike in Tempo, Adj O, 3PA rate82
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JarronColemanSo
BrachenHazenSr
K.J.WaltonSr
LukeBumbaloughSo
IshmaelEl-AminSr
KaniAcreeSo
MiryneThomasJrBHBlakeHugginsJr
ZGZachGunnJr
JWJalenWindhamSoTSTeemuSuokasFr
JBJoshBryanFr
BHBenHendriksSo
| J. ColemanJarron Coleman | So | 6'5" | +0.774 | – | – | 62.5%84 | 26.2%91 | 13.8 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 42.5% | 78.1% |
| B. HazenBrachen Hazen | Sr | 6'8" | +0.464 | – | – | 57.5%68 | 22.8%80 | 9.8 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 32.0% | 76.6% |
| K.J. Walton | Sr | 6'3" | +0.463 | – | – | 59.6%76 | 26.5%92 | 16.4 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.0% | 79.3% |
| L. BumbaloughLuke Bumbalough | So | 6'1" | +0.258 | – | – | 51.6%42 | 13.9%23 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 35.8% | 58.1% |
| I. El-AminIshmael El-Amin | Sr | 6'3" | +0.256 | – | – | 52.6%47 | 24.8%87 | 16.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 31.7% | 88.1% |
| K. AcreeKani Acree | So | 6'6" | -0.241 | – | – | 40.9%15 | 14.1%24 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 21.7% | 84.0% |
| M. ThomasMiryne Thomas | Jr | 6'8" | -0.240 | – | – | 63.8%86 | 19.3%60 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 1.1 | 44.6% | 63.2% |
| B. HugginsBlake Huggins | Jr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 61.2%81 | 13.8%23 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 64.0% |
| Z. GunnZach Gunn | Jr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 61.0%80 | 14.5%26 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 40.0% | 80.0% |
| J. WindhamJalen Windham | So | 6'5" | – | – | – | 41.7%16 | 18.1%51 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 26.9% | 100.0% |
| T. SuokasTeemu Suokas | Fr | 6'2" | – | – | – | 40.0%14 | 14.4%26 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 29.6% | 0.0% |
| J. BryanJosh Bryan | Fr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 25.4%6 | 15.7%34 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 16.7% | 50.0% |
| B. HendriksBen Hendriks | So | 6'10" | – | – | – | 62.7%84 | 14.0%24 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 12-19 | #297 | -10.418 | 100.18 | 110.447 | -4.929 | -10513 | -1435 | 27.1%17 | -6482 | 48.2%10 | 31.7%16 | 69.4%23 |
| 24-25 | 14-17 | #265 | -8.923 | 104.534 | 113.418 | -7.76 | +3957 | -1237 | 27.7%29 | +5018 | 51.9%61 | 34.5%58 | 70.4%32 |
| 23-24 | 15-16 | #260 | -5.930 | 104.438 | 110.327 | -6.712 | +3556 | +1256 | 28.1%38 | +541 | 51.3%55 | 36.2%85 | 76.7%93 |
| 22-23 | 20-12 | #156 | 0.956 | 109.273 | 108.432 | -4.222 | +9275 | +347 | 31.2%71 | +1636 | 53.8%87 | 36.9%89 | 68.9%21 |
| 21-22 | 14-17 | #271 | -8.124 | 101.837 | 109.918 | -4.728 | -1638 | -2229 | 27.1%36 | +4818 | 51.6%68 | 36.1%85 | 69.4%28 |
| 19-20 | 18-13 | #107 | 5.669 | 100.636 | 95.088 | -2.345 | +4360 | +10197 | 25.6%25 | -952 | 50.8%62 | 33.6%53 | 69.3%34 |
| 18-19 | 16-17 | #120 | 5.268 | 106.056 | 100.874 | 1.168 | +7269 | -2630 | 27.9%42 | +5417 | 52.3%67 | 32.5%22 | 70.2%46 |
| 17-18 | 19-13 | #176 | -0.649 | 104.241 | 104.859 | -2.244 | +5063 | -1343 | 28.0%41 | +3920 | 51.6%55 | 33.7%30 | 70.5%39 |
| 16-17 | 21-13 | #176 | -0.450 | 105.056 | 105.445 | -3.728 | +5964 | +5282 | 28.3%37 | +6215 | 54.0%88 | 37.9%85 | 71.8%67 |
| 15-16 | 20-14 | #151 | 1.558 | 103.446 | 101.965 | -2.835 | +8471 | +6388 | 27.9%29 | +6712 | 52.5%82 | 37.2%84 | 69.2%43 |
| 14-15 | 6-23 | #244 | -5.731 | 100.537 | 106.231 | 0.665 | +748 | +5188 | 30.1%38 | +6411 | 49.8%60 | 34.3%50 | 69.3%51 |
| 13-14 | 3-25 | #309 | -12.113 | 97.411 | 109.527 | 0.461 | +11285 | +3879 | 35.6%89 | +1660 | 46.8%14 | 31.4%12 | 69.1%43 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
54.7%#95
Effective FG %
51.3%#101
3-Point %
34.2%#144
3PAR
41.2%#70
FTAR
28.7%#244
Assist %
51.9%#167
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
35.1%#145
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
24.2%#102
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
17 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0367D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.047234.6% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.096242.5% of shots
Late 21s+0.892122.9% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0147Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.14639.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.939138.2% of shots
Late 21s+0.927822.9% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.