



Belmont25-6
MVCCoach: Evan Bradds
25-6NET#58
Poss2,057
Net Rtg12.566
ORtg117.266
DRtg104.756
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,057 | 910 | 12.566 | 117.266 | 104.756 | 61.3%86 | 28.2%44 | 17.5%36 | 33.4%50 | 50.1%52 | 70.8%52 | 17.2%58 | 31.2%52 |
| WestI. WestOrmeS. OrmeScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. Jenkins | 163 | 86 | 16.372 | 110.350 | 94.080 | 60.4%84 | 23.4%24 | 18.4%30 | 22.4%20 | 50.0%58 | 73.4%66 | 20.4%78 | 6.7%98 |
| RogersB. RogersOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsMcClainN. McClain | 97 | 49 | 35.592 | 116.564 | 81.094 | 58.3%76 | 29.5%48 | 17.5%36 | 22.6%22 | 37.8%94 | 67.3%38 | 24.2%92 | 20.7%80 |
| OrmeS. OrmeScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsMcClainN. McClain | 82 | 37 | 48.898 | 145.698 | 96.874 | 73.1%100 | 40.0%84 | 14.7%58 | 46.3%78 | 42.3%84 | 66.7%32 | 19.1%72 | 25.4%68 |
| OrmeS. OrmeScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 67 | 30 | 8.460 | 124.480 | 116.030 | 75.0%100 | 23.8%26 | 18.0%32 | 22.2%20 | 57.1%24 | 74.2%68 | 8.7%8 | 17.9%86 |
| NoyesA. NoyesOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonSmileyJ. Smiley | 52 | 18 | -23.414 | 101.428 | 124.814 | 48.9%34 | 11.1%4 | 7.7%94 | 19.1%14 | 61.1%12 | 80.0%86 | 11.1%16 | 63.0%6 |
| WestI. WestRogersB. RogersOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. Jenkins | 46 | 27 | 24.582 | 122.778 | 98.272 | 68.2%96 | 35.7%72 | 24.1%6 | 42.4%70 | 41.2%88 | 65.8%32 | 11.8%20 | 29.8%56 |
| ScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 44 | 18 | 36.392 | 142.498 | 106.252 | 64.3%92 | 40.0%84 | 11.3%82 | 26.2%30 | 50.0%58 | 70.0%48 | 14.3%36 | 18.2%86 |
| OrmeS. OrmeScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonSmileyJ. Smiley | 44 | 17 | -29.310 | 109.848 | 139.22 | 61.0%84 | 24.0%26 | 6.9%94 | 29.3%40 | 69.6%2 | 78.6%82 | 12.9%26 | 14.3%92 |
| OrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 42 | 14 | 43.196 | 125.582 | 82.492 | 62.9%90 | 25.0%28 | 14.2%62 | 31.4%46 | 39.1%92 | 83.3%94 | 25.6%94 | 56.5%8 |
| RogersB. RogersLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 39 | 18 | -12.426 | 125.082 | 137.44 | 59.1%78 | 31.6%56 | 15.3%54 | 39.4%64 | 52.7%42 | 52.4%4 | 8.1%6 | 40.5%28 |
| RogersB. RogersNoyesA. NoyesLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonSmileyJ. Smiley | 35 | 14 | -32.78 | 110.650 | 143.32 | 71.7%98 | 35.7%72 | 17.0%40 | 30.0%42 | 75.0%0 | 66.7%32 | 6.5%4 | 46.2%18 |
| RogersB. RogersOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 34 | 15 | 37.594 | 125.182 | 87.588 | 67.9%96 | 33.3%66 | 23.3%8 | 17.9%12 | 45.5%74 | 78.6%82 | 16.8%56 | 54.5%10 |
| WestI. WestRogersB. RogersLundbladeT. LundbladeDillonE. DillonJenkinsJ. Jenkins | 34 | 15 | -8.632 | 85.88 | 94.478 | 36.7%6 | 26.3%34 | 14.8%58 | 26.7%32 | 47.1%68 | 77.3%80 | 19.3%72 | 45.7%18 |
| RogersB. RogersScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsSmileyJ. Smiley | 31 | 16 | 52.698 | 124.380 | 71.698 | 70.8%98 | 30.0%50 | 25.5%4 | 20.8%18 | 38.3%92 | 85.0%94 | 17.2%58 | 13.3%94 |
| RogersB. RogersScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeJenkinsJ. JenkinsMcClainN. McClain | 31 | 16 | 12.868 | 127.786 | 114.932 | 75.0%100 | 25.0%28 | 22.3%12 | 29.2%40 | 51.7%46 | 70.6%52 | 12.8%26 | 24.1%72 |
| RogersB. RogersNoyesA. NoyesOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeSmileyJ. Smiley | 30 | 12 | 48.398 | 164.3100 | 116.030 | 94.2%100 | 14.3%6 | 13.1%70 | 11.5%4 | 64.0%8 | 84.6%94 | 8.0%6 | 0.0%100 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.