Belmont25-6

MVCCoach: Evan Bradds

25-6NET#58

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Lundblade	1,795	262	87.3%	+16.896	+20.9100	+4.026	+12.0100	+0.152	−5.398	−4.328	+2.028	−0.150	−2.316	−2.866
Sam Orme	1,197	860	58.2%	+3.464	−1.442	−4.876	+1.566	−5.212	−0.862	+0.756	−0.858	+2.374	+1.980	−7.084
Jabez Jenkins	1,174	884	57.0%	+10.286	−1.940	−12.094	−0.742	+3.784	+4.44	+2.062	−7.998	−2.626	+0.662	−11.394
Drew Scharnowski	1,077	980	52.3%	−4.634	−2.338	+2.336	+0.860	+2.776	+1.428	+0.454	+3.316	+1.870	+0.764	−12.796
Jack Smiley	956	1,101	46.5%	+4.668	+7.186	+2.534	+4.188	−0.746	−2.180	−0.550	+1.236	+0.354	−2.416	+1.938
Eoin Dillon	882	1,175	42.9%	+1.456	+7.186	+5.718	+0.252	+3.382	−2.786	+8.390	+3.118	−0.150	+0.458	+11.84
Brigham Rogers	843	1,214	41.0%	+5.872	−4.826	−10.692	−1.436	+2.776	+2.812	−10.58	−5.692	−1.236	+1.474	−2.262
Isaiah West	819	1,238	39.8%	−6.726	−12.76	−6.080	−4.116	−6.38	+2.118	+8.290	−1.060	+0.354	+3.092	−0.754
Nic McClain	560	1,497	27.2%	+16.496	+6.884	−9.692	+2.778	+5.792	+1.230	+0.656	−6.896	−2.030	+2.386	−2.766
Win Miller	393	1,664	19.1%	−23.44	−10.410	+13.02	−12.32	+6.194	+0.934	+6.984	+4.312	−4.214	−1.032	+11.74
Aidan Noyes	368	1,689	17.9%	−13.810	+1.156	+14.92	+2.778	−9.92	−4.596	−5.622	+10.60	+7.798	−3.86	+10.56

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Lundblade	1,795	262	87.3%	14.570	119.972	105.354	62.8%88	28.2%44	16.9%40	32.9%48	50.4%52	70.8%52	16.8%56	30.7%54
Sam Orme	1,197	860	58.2%	14.170	116.666	102.662	61.9%88	25.9%34	17.2%38	33.7%52	49.7%58	71.8%58	18.0%64	28.1%60
Jabez Jenkins	1,174	884	57.0%	16.574	116.464	99.968	60.9%84	29.9%50	19.4%24	34.3%52	47.1%68	69.9%48	17.4%60	26.9%64
Drew Scharnowski	1,077	980	52.3%	10.464	116.164	105.754	61.6%86	29.5%48	18.2%32	33.6%52	51.6%48	71.6%58	17.5%60	25.4%68
Jack Smiley	956	1,101	46.5%	14.870	121.074	106.252	63.5%90	27.9%42	16.4%44	33.2%50	50.8%52	71.0%54	15.8%48	32.3%48
Eoin Dillon	882	1,175	42.9%	13.268	121.376	108.148	61.4%86	30.1%52	16.0%48	38.2%62	52.0%46	70.8%52	17.4%60	38.4%32
Brigham Rogers	843	1,214	41.0%	15.672	114.460	98.870	60.4%84	29.8%50	19.2%24	27.3%34	47.0%68	70.1%50	17.9%64	30.0%56
Isaiah West	819	1,238	39.8%	8.160	109.648	101.464	58.7%78	24.4%28	18.8%28	38.5%62	49.6%58	71.0%54	18.8%70	30.8%52
Nic McClain	560	1,497	27.2%	24.582	122.176	97.772	63.2%90	32.4%60	18.4%30	33.8%52	45.1%76	69.4%46	18.9%70	29.3%58
Win Miller	393	1,664	19.1%	-6.634	108.846	115.430	51.4%46	33.0%62	18.3%30	39.0%64	53.6%38	67.4%38	16.3%52	40.8%28
Aidan Noyes	368	1,689	17.9%	1.348	118.168	116.928	63.5%90	20.1%16	13.8%64	28.9%38	58.9%18	77.4%80	14.0%34	39.9%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Lundblade	1,795	262	87.3%	-2.342	99.024	101.366	50.7%42	28.2%44	22.2%12	37.2%60	48.4%62	70.9%54	19.1%72	33.6%44
Sam Orme	1,197	860	58.2%	10.664	118.068	107.450	60.4%84	31.2%54	18.0%32	33.1%50	50.5%52	69.5%48	16.1%50	35.1%40
Jabez Jenkins	1,174	884	57.0%	6.356	118.370	112.038	61.7%86	26.1%34	15.1%56	32.3%48	55.0%32	72.4%62	16.8%56	38.2%34
Drew Scharnowski	1,077	980	52.3%	14.970	118.470	103.560	60.9%84	26.8%38	16.8%42	33.2%50	48.3%62	69.8%48	16.8%56	38.1%34
Jack Smiley	956	1,101	46.5%	10.264	113.958	103.760	59.3%80	28.5%44	18.5%30	33.7%52	49.6%58	70.7%52	18.1%64	30.4%54
Eoin Dillon	882	1,175	42.9%	11.866	114.258	102.462	61.2%86	26.8%38	18.7%28	29.8%40	48.9%60	70.8%52	17.0%56	26.6%64
Brigham Rogers	843	1,214	41.0%	9.862	119.270	109.444	61.9%88	27.1%38	16.4%44	37.8%62	52.6%42	71.4%56	16.6%54	32.2%48
Isaiah West	819	1,238	39.8%	14.870	122.278	107.450	62.8%88	30.7%52	16.7%42	30.3%42	50.5%52	70.7%52	15.8%48	31.5%50
Nic McClain	560	1,497	27.2%	8.160	115.462	107.350	60.5%84	26.7%38	17.2%38	33.3%50	52.0%46	71.4%56	16.5%52	31.9%50
Win Miller	393	1,664	19.1%	16.874	119.270	102.462	63.7%90	26.9%38	17.4%36	32.1%46	49.3%58	71.5%58	17.4%60	29.1%58
Aidan Noyes	368	1,689	17.9%	15.070	117.066	102.064	60.8%84	30.0%52	18.4%30	34.5%54	48.3%62	69.7%48	17.9%62	29.4%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.