Butler17-15

Big EastCoach: Thad Matta

17-15NET#67

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahmyl Telfort	1,800	274	86.8%	+4.668	+11.294	+6.718	+2.172	+0.758	−4.192	+4.174	+6.54	+3.380	+1.572	−2.060
Pierre Brooks II	1,710	364	82.5%	+6.374	+10.392	+4.028	+1.870	+5.892	−1.874	+3.874	+0.940	−1.338	−0.838	+4.126
Posh Alexander	1,603	471	77.3%	−5.132	−7.516	−2.462	−3.220	+6.494	+4.56	−2.440	+3.616	+4.588	+2.786	−4.472
DJ Davis	1,517	557	73.2%	+2.560	+7.886	+5.322	+4.690	−1.042	−1.064	−0.250	+4.014	−0.546	+1.068	+4.724
Jalen Thomas	1,179	895	56.8%	−0.848	−1.144	−0.350	+0.758	−3.820	−1.570	−8.612	+1.532	−1.140	+3.090	−1.054
Landon Moore	776	1,298	37.4%	−2.740	−2.240	+0.646	−0.842	−6.78	−2.076	+0.254	−1.564	−1.934	−1.134	−1.156
Finley Bizjack	708	1,366	34.1%	−1.744	−6.818	−5.174	−2.824	−1.340	+0.244	−2.040	−5.290	−1.636	−1.134	+0.944
Andre Screen	622	1,452	30.0%	+4.368	+3.268	−1.154	−2.328	+7.998	−0.860	+1.560	−2.272	+0.454	−2.318	−0.450
Boden Kapke	231	1,843	11.1%	−1.744	−4.726	−3.066	+4.288	−7.06	+5.12	+12.496	−0.454	+3.380	−1.528	−4.472
Connor Turnbull	128	1,946	6.2%	+15.494	+0.552	−14.996	+0.454	+3.480	+1.526	+4.778	−10.898	+1.060	−2.418	−0.250

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahmyl Telfort	1,800	274	86.8%	3.854	112.258	108.546	52.1%56	30.3%48	15.3%58	26.8%40	51.1%46	68.4%48	16.4%46	22.1%72
Pierre Brooks II	1,710	364	82.5%	4.354	112.658	108.246	52.1%56	31.2%52	15.5%56	26.9%40	50.3%48	67.7%44	16.0%44	23.1%68
Posh Alexander	1,603	471	77.3%	2.050	109.150	107.048	51.1%50	31.6%54	16.8%46	25.7%38	51.0%46	69.1%50	16.8%48	21.4%74
DJ Davis	1,517	557	73.2%	3.854	112.860	109.044	53.1%60	29.9%46	15.6%56	26.2%38	51.3%46	67.8%44	16.4%46	23.8%66
Jalen Thomas	1,179	895	56.8%	2.852	110.354	107.448	52.1%56	28.5%40	15.2%60	22.6%28	50.8%48	67.5%44	17.5%54	22.0%72
Landon Moore	776	1,298	37.4%	1.548	109.452	107.946	51.3%50	26.0%30	14.6%64	26.4%40	49.3%54	66.8%42	15.5%40	21.7%72
Finley Bizjack	708	1,366	34.1%	2.150	106.344	104.256	50.0%42	29.4%44	16.0%54	25.0%36	46.8%66	66.9%42	15.4%40	23.0%68
Andre Screen	622	1,452	30.0%	6.258	113.060	106.848	50.3%46	35.6%70	15.3%58	27.3%42	48.6%58	68.2%46	14.5%32	22.2%70
Boden Kapke	231	1,843	11.1%	1.750	106.644	104.954	55.6%70	23.9%24	20.4%24	37.4%68	49.8%54	70.9%58	14.8%36	18.6%82
Connor Turnbull	128	1,946	6.2%	17.776	111.256	93.678	52.2%56	33.3%62	17.2%44	30.7%52	40.1%88	68.9%50	13.9%30	22.2%70

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahmyl Telfort	1,800	274	86.8%	-0.844	101.032	101.862	50.0%42	29.6%46	19.3%30	22.7%30	44.6%76	65.1%34	14.9%36	24.2%64
Pierre Brooks II	1,710	364	82.5%	-2.042	102.334	104.356	50.3%46	25.4%28	17.3%44	23.1%30	49.4%54	69.0%50	16.8%50	19.0%80
Posh Alexander	1,603	471	77.3%	7.158	116.570	109.442	54.3%64	25.2%28	12.3%78	28.1%46	47.4%64	64.6%32	14.1%30	25.8%58
DJ Davis	1,517	557	73.2%	1.448	105.140	103.758	48.5%38	30.9%52	16.5%50	26.4%40	47.3%64	68.3%48	15.4%40	19.0%80
Jalen Thomas	1,179	895	56.8%	3.654	111.456	107.846	51.5%52	32.3%56	16.6%48	31.2%54	49.3%54	68.6%48	14.4%32	23.0%68
Landon Moore	776	1,298	37.4%	4.254	111.656	107.348	52.1%56	32.7%58	16.6%48	26.2%38	50.7%48	68.7%48	16.6%48	22.9%68
Finley Bizjack	708	1,366	34.1%	3.854	113.160	109.342	52.8%58	30.7%50	15.7%54	26.9%42	52.0%42	68.5%48	16.5%48	22.1%72
Andre Screen	622	1,452	30.0%	1.950	109.852	107.946	52.6%58	27.6%38	16.0%52	25.8%38	50.8%48	67.8%44	16.9%50	22.5%70
Boden Kapke	231	1,843	11.1%	3.452	111.356	107.946	51.4%52	30.9%52	15.2%58	25.1%36	50.2%48	67.6%44	16.3%46	22.9%68
Connor Turnbull	128	1,946	6.2%	2.250	110.754	108.546	51.8%54	30.0%46	15.7%54	26.0%38	50.9%48	67.9%44	16.3%46	22.4%70

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.