Cal Poly3-28

Big WestCoach: John Smith

3-28NET#340

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quentin Jones	1,604	375	81.1%	−9.920	−5.324	+4.726	−1.634	−6.010	−0.556	+2.766	+0.050	−3.124	−1.726	+3.730
Kobe Sanders	1,513	466	76.4%	+13.190	+9.992	−3.266	+3.182	−3.026	−3.086	+4.978	−1.968	−2.628	+2.484	+3.530
Jarred Hyder	1,320	659	66.7%	+0.150	+3.066	+2.934	−2.030	−1.340	−4.092	+4.376	+0.050	+0.656	−1.232	+2.634
Justin Page	973	1,006	49.2%	+3.162	+2.664	−0.552	+0.254	+3.178	+1.230	+2.766	−1.464	−3.718	+1.370	−0.350
Joel Armotrading	885	1,094	44.7%	+6.674	+3.870	−2.864	+0.758	+5.892	+1.824	+3.170	−0.656	−0.250	+0.864	−0.954
Tuukka Jaakkola	841	1,139	42.5%	−14.810	−10.810	+4.028	−0.248	−6.110	+1.922	−9.610	+5.08	+3.884	−1.332	−9.890
Aaron Price Jr.	815	1,164	41.2%	+8.178	−0.050	−8.286	−3.420	+6.994	−1.064	−0.152	+0.246	+6.896	+1.372	−0.652
Paul Bizimana	742	1,237	37.5%	+12.790	+6.180	−6.680	+5.694	+0.658	+2.020	+1.258	−3.480	−2.726	+1.878	−11.392
Aidan Prukop	335	1,644	16.9%	−2.840	−0.050	+2.734	−0.644	+2.372	−0.352	−2.240	−1.968	+4.186	−4.26	+14.22
Isaac Spears	333	1,646	16.8%	−15.010	−9.812	+5.224	−2.326	−2.628	+0.244	−9.010	+4.312	−3.122	+0.864	−7.384
Hayden Jory	299	1,680	15.1%	−0.150	+7.586	+7.614	+7.998	+2.270	+3.68	+3.170	+1.632	+3.682	−3.310	+18.90
Cole Haller	118	1,861	6.0%	−19.26	−15.04	+4.228	−9.42	−3.026	+1.032	+1.158	−2.272	−9.72	+1.170	−2.966
Cam Malray	112	1,867	5.7%	−24.04	−18.72	+5.422	−11.02	−13.12	−7.398	−10.88	−1.766	−3.520	−1.330	+12.54

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quentin Jones	1,604	375	81.1%	-21.318	94.320	115.628	45.4%26	26.6%34	19.3%30	31.9%56	51.6%44	62.2%24	17.7%54	42.1%18
Kobe Sanders	1,513	466	76.4%	-16.322	97.624	113.932	46.4%30	27.0%34	18.6%34	32.5%58	51.1%46	62.1%24	18.6%62	42.2%18
Jarred Hyder	1,320	659	66.7%	-19.320	96.322	115.628	45.0%24	27.3%36	18.0%38	32.7%58	51.6%44	62.9%26	17.6%54	42.3%18
Justin Page	973	1,006	49.2%	-17.820	96.624	114.430	45.8%28	29.3%44	19.9%26	32.7%58	50.9%46	60.9%20	18.6%62	41.3%20
Joel Armotrading	885	1,094	44.7%	-15.724	97.424	113.134	46.1%28	31.0%52	20.3%24	33.0%58	51.3%46	62.6%24	18.4%60	40.9%20
Tuukka Jaakkola	841	1,139	42.5%	-27.912	89.114	117.026	45.6%26	24.2%24	20.5%24	25.8%38	54.5%30	64.9%34	17.3%52	35.8%30
Aaron Price Jr.	815	1,164	41.2%	-14.724	95.320	110.040	43.8%20	31.6%54	18.8%34	31.3%54	51.7%42	66.7%42	18.8%62	41.0%20
Paul Bizimana	742	1,237	37.5%	-11.428	99.128	110.540	49.3%40	28.1%40	20.6%22	32.1%56	49.5%54	61.0%20	19.1%64	34.4%34
Aidan Prukop	335	1,644	16.9%	-21.718	95.320	116.926	45.2%24	29.6%46	19.1%32	29.6%50	50.0%54	66.1%38	14.5%32	53.3%8
Isaac Spears	333	1,646	16.8%	-31.810	87.112	119.022	43.8%20	25.6%30	19.5%28	23.9%32	55.2%28	60.1%18	18.6%62	35.4%30
Hayden Jory	299	1,680	15.1%	-19.518	101.734	121.118	52.5%56	29.6%46	22.4%16	34.0%62	53.0%38	65.8%36	15.1%38	57.6%6
Cole Haller	118	1,861	6.0%	-37.48	81.28	118.622	36.9%6	25.0%26	20.3%24	32.3%58	49.5%54	53.6%6	19.0%64	38.7%24
Cam Malray	112	1,867	5.7%	-42.06	77.76	119.720	35.4%6	15.5%6	12.5%78	21.2%24	50.0%54	59.4%16	16.7%48	53.2%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quentin Jones	1,604	375	81.1%	-11.328	99.628	110.938	47.0%32	32.6%58	19.8%28	29.2%48	51.6%44	65.3%34	19.4%66	38.4%24
Kobe Sanders	1,513	466	76.4%	-29.412	87.712	117.126	43.4%18	30.0%46	21.7%18	27.6%44	53.0%36	64.7%32	16.2%44	38.8%24
Jarred Hyder	1,320	659	66.7%	-19.420	93.318	112.734	47.1%32	28.6%42	22.0%18	28.5%46	51.6%44	62.3%24	18.8%62	39.6%22
Justin Page	973	1,006	49.2%	-20.918	94.020	114.930	45.6%26	26.2%32	18.8%34	30.0%50	52.3%40	64.6%32	17.4%52	41.5%20
Joel Armotrading	885	1,094	44.7%	-22.416	93.618	115.928	45.4%24	25.2%28	18.6%36	30.0%50	51.9%42	62.8%26	17.6%54	41.8%18
Tuukka Jaakkola	841	1,139	42.5%	-13.126	99.930	113.034	45.8%26	30.3%48	18.5%36	35.4%64	49.5%54	61.1%20	18.5%60	45.6%14
Aaron Price Jr.	815	1,164	41.2%	-22.816	95.320	118.124	47.2%32	24.7%26	19.8%28	31.4%54	51.5%44	59.9%16	17.4%54	41.6%20
Paul Bizimana	742	1,237	37.5%	-24.116	93.018	117.126	43.7%20	27.5%36	18.6%36	30.9%54	52.9%38	63.8%28	17.3%52	45.7%14
Aidan Prukop	335	1,644	16.9%	-18.920	95.320	114.232	45.8%26	27.3%36	19.4%30	31.7%56	51.9%42	62.0%24	18.7%62	39.0%22
Isaac Spears	333	1,646	16.8%	-16.822	96.924	113.832	46.1%28	28.2%40	19.3%30	32.9%58	50.9%48	63.2%26	17.8%56	42.7%18
Hayden Jory	299	1,680	15.1%	-19.420	94.220	113.532	44.6%22	27.4%36	18.8%34	30.9%54	51.4%44	62.2%24	18.5%60	38.7%24
Cole Haller	118	1,861	6.0%	-18.220	96.222	114.430	46.3%28	28.0%38	19.3%30	31.3%54	51.8%42	63.4%28	17.9%56	41.6%20
Cam Malray	112	1,867	5.7%	-18.020	96.422	114.430	46.4%30	28.6%40	19.8%28	32.0%56	51.7%44	63.0%26	18.1%58	40.7%20

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.