Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
NEC
Central Connecticut logo

Central Connecticut

4-25NET#351Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #257Coach: Howie Dickenman
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
LHALPenn logoLBoston College logoLBinghamton logoLMaine logoLBrown logoLFordham logoLRutgers logoWUMass Lowell logoLConnecticut logoLYale logoLBryant logoLLIU logoLMount St. Mary's logoLFairleigh Dickinson logoLSacred Heart logoLWagner logoLRobert Morris logoLSaint Francis logoWBryant logoLSt. Francis NY logoWRobert Morris logoLSaint Francis logoLSt. Francis NY logoLSacred Heart logoWMount St. Mary's logoLWagner logoLLIU logoLFairleigh Dickinson logo

Team Stats

29 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-18.84
  • Offensive Rating93.21
  • Defensive Rating112.036
  • Pace69.883
  • Effective FG%44.9%4
  • Off Rebound Pct29.8%53
  • Turnover Pct19.9%38
  • FT Attempt Rate31.1%11

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct13.8%1
  • Point Margin / Game-13.11
  • Points / Game65.17
  • Points Allowed / Game78.212
  • 1st Half Margin-6.62
  • 2nd Half Margin-6.51
  • Avg Largest Lead5.34
  • Avg Largest Deficit18.65

Box Score

  • Points / Game65.17
  • Rebounds / Game36.252
  • Assists / Game11.822
  • ORebs / Game11.670
  • DRebs / Game24.736
  • Steals / Game4.45
  • Blocks / Game3.763
  • Turnovers / Game13.916
  • PFs / Game17.485

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.518
  • FGAs / Game58.762
  • Field Goal Pct40.0%6
  • 2PMs / Game17.944
  • 2PAs / Game42.291
  • 2-Point Pct42.3%2
  • 3PMs / Game5.714
  • 3PAs / Game16.58
  • 3-Point Pct34.2%45
  • FTMs / Game12.410
  • FTAs / Game18.313
  • Free Throw Pct67.9%27

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s54.9%87
  • % Pts from 3s26.1%29
  • % Pts from FTs19.1%31
  • Paint Pts / Game23.158
  • % Pts in Paint35.5%76
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.342
  • % Pts on Fast Break5.0%49
  • Points off TOVs / Game9.131
  • % Pts off TOVs13.9%39
  • 1st Half Pts / Game29.99
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.48

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %48.8%3
  • Points / Shot1.112
  • 3-Point Att Rate28.1%8
  • Assist Pct50.0%33
  • Assists / 100 Poss16.87
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.85x14
  • PF Drawn / Game17.17

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%53.4%10
  • Opp True Shooting %56.3%19
  • Opp Field Goal Pct47.5%5
  • Opp 2-Point Pct53.2%8
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.8%32
  • Opp 3PA Rate32.7%75
  • Opp FT Att Rate30.5%85
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2840

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game78.212
  • Paint Pts Allowed32.82
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.66
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed14.212
  • Opp Assist Pct52.7%48
  • TOVs Forced / Game10.35

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct69.8%44
  • Turnovers Forced Pct14.8%3
  • Steal Pct6.3%3
  • Block Pct5.3%49
  • Hakeem Pct11.6%7
  • PF Efficiency1.02x55
  • Steals / PF0.25x12
  • Blocks / PF0.21x72

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 116 D-I teams
  • #112PO TOV Diff-160
  • #134Paint Pts %40.7%
  • #183OREB%29.8%
  • #1973P%34.2%
  • #209Opp OREB%30.2%
  • #214FB Pts %5.8%
  • #235AST%50.0%
  • #244REB Diff-49
Where they rank worstof 116 D-I teams
  • #348Adj DRtg117.0
  • #345Pts Diff-380
  • #343TS%48.3%
  • #340SOS-8.6
  • #340Adj ORtg92.0
  • #339eFG%44.9%
  • #337Opp TOV%14.9%
  • #332Opp eFG%53.4%
Game Log
Loading game log…
BPBrandonPeelSrMJMustafaJonesSoAustin Nehls headshotAustinNehlsFrJNJahlilNailsFr
KSKevinSeymourSo
KCKhalenCumberlanderJr
JCJJCratitJr
SLShakarisLaneySo
TPTidellPierreJrMTMalikToppinFr
GIGeorge DavisIIIJr
EPEvanPhoenixFr
EBEricBowlesFr
MSMalcolmSimmonsJr
B. PeelSr6'7"+0.34350.1%4023.6%8311.79.12.00.0%77.7%
M. JonesSo6'7"-0.21750.4%4220.2%657.53.81.00.0%78.4%
A. NehlsFr6'3"-0.31354.8%6317.1%4211.73.81.638.2%77.8%
J. NailsFr6'5"-0.6756.2%7016.6%386.72.00.439.1%78.3%
K. SeymourSo6'0"-0.6744.4%2217.7%474.31.62.233.3%72.2%
K. CumberlanderJr6'3"-1.1245.8%2624.2%8610.83.72.824.2%57.4%
JJ CratitJr6'3"-1.6042.0%1724.0%857.31.40.533.3%60.5%
S. LaneySo6'4"36.6%1123.3%821.60.80.118.2%55.6%
T. PierreJr6'6"40.4%1515.6%312.12.60.2100.0%52.2%
M. ToppinFr6'8"54.9%6416.6%383.22.00.20.0%52.6%
G. Davis IIIJr6'0"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
E. PhoenixFr6'9"45.8%2620.4%674.23.60.40.0%62.5%
E. BowlesFr6'0"33.8%912.8%151.30.81.450.0%22.2%
M. SimmonsJr6'5"43.0%1920.7%682.51.50.350.0%66.7%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Central Connecticut logo25-2618-12#264-7.528108.547116.016-10.03+4157-173228.5%26+352153.6%7436.8%9176.9%92
Central Connecticut logo24-2525-7#1362.663104.735102.182-10.01+11077-133627.0%23-326653.8%8234.6%6074.2%71
Central Connecticut logo23-2420-11#214-3.541103.334106.850-9.11+6165-74228.5%42-477750.8%4732.2%2370.9%37
Central Connecticut logo22-2310-22#326-12.71099.718112.412-7.76-2435-232628.5%43+392148.1%1532.7%2870.9%42
Central Connecticut logo21-228-24#344-18.1492.83110.913-5.521-1488-153526.3%29+372746.0%734.2%5770.8%44
Central Connecticut logo19-204-27#347-22.4290.92113.33-3.537-2312-70923.3%12+362145.4%435.7%8567.6%20
Central Connecticut logo18-1911-20#320-12.99100.324113.27-5.517+546-94330.4%69+193646.9%832.8%2778.2%99
Central Connecticut logo17-1814-18#288-10.31899.817110.026-7.26+10179-78531.1%70+113251.0%5032.9%2069.9%32
Central Connecticut logo16-176-23#336-19.1494.56113.56-7.09-6224-87331.5%71+213546.7%935.1%5262.0%1
Central Connecticut logo15-164-25#351-25.0092.03117.01-8.64-4929-441629.8%49+102244.9%434.2%4567.9%27
Central Connecticut logo14-155-26#342-19.7392.76112.45-4.421-4728-75430.9%47+110344.6%632.2%2471.0%70
Central Connecticut logo13-1410-19#312-13.41198.114111.517-5.120-1516-581028.9%24+282848.2%3133.5%4071.7%68

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
48.3%#342
Effective FG %
44.9%#338
3-Point %
34.2%#192
3PAR
28.1%#324
FTAR
31.1%#314
Assist %
50.0%#233

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
38.7%#91
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
33.9%#274
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

26 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.0% of shots at 0.64 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0950.0%0.64Middle (11–20s): 25.4% of shots at 1.18 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0425.4%1.18Late (21s+): 24.6% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9724.6%1.15SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 50.3% of shots at 0.82 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0750.3%0.82Middle (11–20s): 27.6% of shots at 1.32 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0227.6%1.32Late (21s+): 22.1% of shots at 1.23 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9522.1%1.23SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

26 games
Created byFinished by
Khalen Cumberlander → Brandon Peel: 13 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 6 mid-range · 0 from three)Khalen Cumberlander → Austin Nehls: 14 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 13 from three)Khalen Cumberlander → Mustafa Jones: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Khalen Cumberlander → Jj Cratit: 7 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 6 from three)Brandon Peel → Austin Nehls: 12 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 11 from three)Brandon Peel → Mustafa Jones: 8 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Brandon Peel → Khalen Cumberlander: 11 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Brandon Peel → Evan Phoenix: 8 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Kevin Seymour → Brandon Peel: 9 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 6 mid-range · 0 from three)Kevin Seymour → Austin Nehls: 20 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 20 from three)Austin Nehls → Brandon Peel: 17 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 9 mid-range · 0 from three)Austin Nehls → Mustafa Jones: 8 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 6 mid-range · 0 from three)Mustafa Jones → Brandon Peel: 10 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Mustafa Jones → Khalen Cumberlander: 8 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 1 from three)Cumberlander42 astPeel39 astSeymour29 astNehls25 astJones18 astPeel49 madeNehls46 madeJones24 madeCumberlander19 madePhoenixCratit
Seymour is the least-assisted finisher — 100% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.