Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
CAA
Charleston logo

Charleston

17-15NET#134Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #122
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WSouth Carolina St. logoWLipscomb logoWLoyola MD logoLNorth Carolina logoLOklahoma St. logoWChattanooga logoWTulane logoLFurman logoWTulane logoWPresbyterian logoLStetson logoWOld Dominion logoLDelaware logoWElon logoLUNC Wilmington logoLTowson logoLJames Madison logoWWilliam & Mary logoLHofstra logoWNortheastern logoWWilliam & Mary logoWElon logoLUNC Wilmington logoWDrexel logoLJames Madison logoLTowson logoWNortheastern logoWDelaware logoLDrexel logoLHofstra logoWHofstra logoLUNC Wilmington logo

Team Stats

32 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating2.449
  • Offensive Rating105.142
  • Defensive Rating102.857
  • Pace74.499
  • Effective FG%50.3%49
  • Off Rebound Pct35.9%98
  • Turnover Pct21.0%18
  • FT Attempt Rate30.4%54

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct53.1%52
  • Point Margin / Game1.849
  • Points / Game78.293
  • Points Allowed / Game76.49
  • 1st Half Margin1.959
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.238
  • Avg Largest Lead12.357
  • Avg Largest Deficit7.777

Box Score

  • Points / Game78.293
  • Rebounds / Game40.397
  • Assists / Game13.254
  • ORebs / Game13.899
  • DRebs / Game26.679
  • Steals / Game8.088
  • Blocks / Game2.836
  • Turnovers / Game15.63
  • PFs / Game20.61

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game28.093
  • FGAs / Game63.797
  • Field Goal Pct43.9%47
  • 2PMs / Game19.884
  • 2PAs / Game39.886
  • 2-Point Pct49.9%48
  • 3PMs / Game8.170
  • 3PAs / Game23.972
  • 3-Point Pct33.9%50
  • FTMs / Game14.178
  • FTAs / Game19.374
  • Free Throw Pct73.0%64

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s50.8%48
  • % Pts from 3s31.2%48
  • % Pts from FTs18.1%58
  • Paint Pts / Game32.399
  • % Pts in Paint41.3%98
  • Fast Break Pts / Game10.194
  • % Pts on Fast Break12.9%90
  • Points off TOVs / Game16.797
  • % Pts off TOVs21.3%89
  • 1st Half Pts / Game37.192
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game40.694

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.1%50
  • Points / Shot1.2352
  • 3-Point Att Rate37.6%48
  • Assist Pct47.2%21
  • Assists / 100 Poss17.723
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.84x13
  • PF Drawn / Game18.180

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%51.2%35
  • Opp True Shooting %55.6%26
  • Opp Field Goal Pct45.2%28
  • Opp 2-Point Pct51.3%33
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.1%41
  • Opp 3PA Rate35.3%73
  • Opp FT Att Rate37.6%9
  • Opp Points / Shot1.3014

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game76.49
  • Paint Pts Allowed31.02
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed10.61
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed17.52
  • Opp Assist Pct47.1%78
  • TOVs Forced / Game14.385

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct75.0%84
  • Turnovers Forced Pct19.2%55
  • Steal Pct10.7%68
  • Block Pct3.7%21
  • Hakeem Pct14.4%42
  • PF Efficiency1.14x22
  • Steals / PF0.39x47
  • Blocks / PF0.13x11

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 18 D-I teams
  • #8FB Pts Diff-16
  • #10OREB%35.9%
  • #17REB Diff+220
  • #65Opp OREB%25.0%
  • #92Paint Pts %43.5%
  • #97FB Pts %13.6%
  • #1073PM Diff+33
  • #136SOS0.1
Where they rank worstof 18 D-I teams
  • #316TOV%21.0%
  • #284AST%47.2%
  • #254Opp eFG%51.2%
  • #223Opp 3P%34.1%
  • #182Pts Diff+56
  • #180eFG%50.3%
  • #1783P%33.9%
  • #178TS%53.6%
Game Log
Loading game log…
Dalton Bolon headshotDaltonBolonSrDimitrius Underwood headshotDimitriusUnderwoodSrJohn Meeks headshotJohnMeeksSrRSReyneSmithFrBen Burnham headshotBenBurnhamFrRaekwon Horton headshotRaekwonHortonFrBrenden Tucker headshotBrendenTuckerJrBabacar Faye headshotBabacarFayeFrFah'mir Ali headshotFah'mirAliSo
Osinachi Smart headshotOsinachiSmartSr
JSJordanSechanSr
NFNickFarrarSo
CLCharlesLamptenJr
ACAdamComerFr
JMJackMillerFr
DRDylanRitterFr
NENikitaEvdokimovFr
D. BolonSr6'4"+2.09446.9%2121.6%739.04.01.335.7%100.0%
D. UnderwoodSr6'4"+1.68649.9%3126.8%9211.66.63.617.1%68.2%
J. MeeksSr6'6"+1.37657.7%6924.6%8614.14.72.436.8%79.3%
R. SmithFr6'2"+1.27259.2%7517.3%4512.12.31.437.5%92.9%
B. BurnhamFr6'7"+1.06555.0%5618.4%527.74.30.832.4%65.1%
R. HortonFr6'6"+0.85856.3%6314.6%265.23.70.829.2%78.4%
B. TuckerJr6'3"+0.54453.1%4723.3%8111.22.41.238.5%66.2%
B. FayeFr6'8"+0.23453.6%5015.8%334.33.20.77.7%56.3%
F. AliSo5'10"-0.12339.8%1024.2%857.62.13.423.1%88.2%
O. SmartSr6'8"60.0%7713.3%193.64.60.40.0%63.3%
J. SechanSr6'1"27.3%57.5%40.40.40.220.0%0.0%
N. FarrarSo6'6"58.8%7426.4%925.61.70.442.1%96.2%
C. LamptenJr6'11"54.3%5410.4%81.82.50.30.0%42.4%
A. ComerFr6'9"0.0%115.2%290.01.00.00.0%0.0%
J. MillerFr5'11"0.0%129.1%960.00.00.00.0%0.0%
D. RitterFr6'1"0.0%111.1%100.00.00.00.0%0.0%
N. EvdokimovFr6'5"45.7%1918.6%531.10.60.640.0%77.8%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Charleston logo25-2621-11#181-1.050108.345109.354-2.254-140-77730.2%43+94150.1%2629.7%373.2%57
Charleston logo24-2524-9#1471.159107.650106.462-2.751+642+125626.6%18-75152.5%6935.3%7271.6%43
Charleston logo23-2427-8#1007.172113.283106.155-1.258+16288+999633.6%85-557852.2%7034.3%5572.2%53
Charleston logo22-2331-4#4613.588111.78398.288-3.531+22297+14310035.2%96-658351.5%5833.1%3474.4%79
Charleston logo21-2217-15#1342.762105.156102.5610.162+22096+337135.9%98+422250.3%4933.9%5073.0%64
Charleston logo19-2017-14#1680.252104.058103.843-1.057-11012+216222.9%9-427650.9%6334.7%7276.1%92
Charleston logo18-1924-9#1105.369108.873103.559-2.838+1649-362425.4%22-748654.5%8934.0%4176.4%96
Charleston logo17-1826-8#1104.769108.466103.764-2.935-2036+206125.7%19-648452.8%7136.0%6775.4%87
Charleston logo16-1725-10#946.473105.55799.1810.263-4030-104125.5%15-738749.0%2833.0%2173.7%82
Charleston logo15-1616-14#1244.26598.72094.5950.259+3557+337530.0%50-538148.0%2434.6%4966.7%17
Charleston logo14-159-24#276-8.72194.311103.051-0.359-11613+65427.6%16+203545.9%1234.3%5166.0%20
Charleston logo13-1413-18#195-2.14399.619101.772-1.547+17695+518635.2%85+101347.3%1934.1%4765.6%12

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.6%#170
Effective FG %
50.3%#179
3-Point %
33.9%#174
3PAR
37.6%#185
FTAR
30.4%#165
Assist %
47.2%#284

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
37.3%#113
Rim FG %
53.8%#255
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.5%#144
Mid-range FG %
44.0%#22
Corner 3 shareof all threes taken
18.6%#141
Corner 3 FG %
27.4%#272
Above-break 3 FG %
34.5%#120

Shot clock

26 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.9% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0943.9%1.06Middle (11–20s): 35.2% of shots at 1.01 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0435.2%1.01Late (21s+): 20.9% of shots at 0.96 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9720.9%0.96SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 34.7% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0734.7%1.06Middle (11–20s): 37.1% of shots at 1.03 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0237.1%1.03Late (21s+): 28.2% of shots at 0.93 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9528.2%0.93SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

26 games
Created byFinished by
Dimitrius Underwood → Reyne Smith: 27 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 26 from three)Dimitrius Underwood → Brenden Tucker: 12 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 9 from three)Dimitrius Underwood → Ben Burnham: 14 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 7 from three)Dimitrius Underwood → John Meeks: 10 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Dimitrius Underwood → Osinachi Smart: 8 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)John Meeks → Reyne Smith: 11 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 8 from three)John Meeks → Brenden Tucker: 12 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 9 from three)John Meeks → Ben Burnham: 6 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Brenden Tucker → Reyne Smith: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Brenden Tucker → John Meeks: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Brenden Tucker → Nick Farrar: 10 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Ben Burnham → Reyne Smith: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Ben Burnham → Brenden Tucker: 7 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 4 from three)Reyne Smith → Nick Farrar: 7 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 3 from three)Underwood71 astMeeks29 astTucker23 astBurnham15 astSmithSmith52 madeTucker31 madeBurnham20 madeMeeks17 madeFarrar17 madeSmart
Underwood is the least-assisted finisher — 91% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 21-22. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 21-22. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.