Charleston23-9

CAA

23-9NET#149

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

CJ Fulton	1,754	373	82.4%	+8.682	+5.078	−3.670	+0.454	+0.354	−2.280	+8.690	−6.094	−7.16	−0.640	+1.938
Ante Brzovic	1,751	377	82.3%	+9.684	+6.784	−2.966	+8.4100	−10.12	−0.150	−1.046	−2.374	+0.252	−2.118	−5.278
Derrin Boyd	1,593	534	74.9%	−2.642	+2.866	+5.422	−1.436	+0.152	−2.888	−0.848	+0.444	−2.626	−2.218	−7.486
Deywilk Tavarez	1,253	874	58.9%	+6.876	+5.580	−1.356	+3.786	−2.132	−1.166	+0.656	−1.262	+3.482	−1.922	+1.342
Lazar Djokovic	1,152	975	54.2%	−7.426	−4.030	+3.430	−2.030	+6.694	+3.48	+5.982	+1.730	+1.566	−0.740	−0.452
AJ Smith	1,122	1,006	52.7%	+5.170	+5.880	+0.744	+1.668	+1.162	−3.290	−9.88	−2.474	−6.56	−1.134	−8.088
Justas Stonkus	815	1,312	38.3%	−3.738	−5.822	−2.262	−0.544	−1.934	+2.416	−0.648	+1.136	+0.858	+1.676	+2.634
Elijah Jones	540	1,588	25.4%	−3.040	−3.832	−0.752	−4.014	+5.692	−0.964	−4.128	+3.714	+1.668	+4.898	+6.218
Djordje Curcic	314	1,813	14.8%	−10.018	−4.528	+5.422	−3.020	−1.834	−0.658	−7.914	+5.94	+4.188	+1.068	+6.816
Jaxon Prunty	179	1,948	8.4%	+17.996	+2.264	−15.798	+2.980	+2.372	+4.14	+11.296	−8.698	+4.992	+2.890	+14.92

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

CJ Fulton	1,754	373	82.4%	4.654	109.550	104.954	52.1%54	28.8%42	16.0%54	35.1%64	49.0%58	68.5%48	16.5%46	26.6%58
Ante Brzovic	1,751	377	82.3%	4.856	109.852	105.054	53.6%60	26.6%32	16.4%52	33.4%60	49.7%56	69.7%54	16.3%44	25.3%62
Derrin Boyd	1,593	534	74.9%	2.452	109.350	106.950	51.7%52	28.8%42	15.7%58	33.4%60	50.2%50	69.1%50	16.1%42	24.5%64
Deywilk Tavarez	1,253	874	58.9%	5.856	110.854	105.054	53.5%60	27.9%38	16.0%54	33.8%60	49.6%56	71.1%60	15.9%42	26.8%58
Lazar Djokovic	1,152	975	54.2%	-0.446	106.844	107.150	51.1%48	31.8%54	18.0%40	36.3%66	50.9%50	70.4%56	16.3%44	26.0%60
AJ Smith	1,122	1,006	52.7%	5.456	111.356	105.952	52.7%56	29.3%44	14.9%64	29.1%46	49.0%58	66.8%42	16.1%42	22.6%70
Justas Stonkus	815	1,312	38.3%	0.848	105.040	104.256	51.7%52	27.6%38	17.9%40	33.2%58	50.8%50	70.2%56	17.6%54	27.9%54
Elijah Jones	540	1,588	25.4%	0.848	105.842	105.054	49.1%38	32.8%58	15.7%56	30.6%52	52.9%38	70.9%60	20.2%72	30.9%44
Djordje Curcic	314	1,813	14.8%	-5.538	104.738	110.242	49.5%40	27.2%36	15.9%56	26.9%40	55.2%28	73.2%70	17.5%52	32.1%42
Jaxon Prunty	179	1,948	8.4%	19.578	110.652	91.282	54.7%64	30.9%50	20.1%24	43.9%80	42.1%84	74.2%74	19.3%66	40.0%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

CJ Fulton	1,754	373	82.4%	-4.040	104.438	108.546	51.7%52	28.6%42	18.2%38	26.5%40	55.0%30	75.6%78	17.2%50	24.7%64
Ante Brzovic	1,751	377	82.3%	-4.940	103.034	107.948	45.2%24	36.7%72	16.5%50	34.4%62	52.0%44	69.6%54	18.4%60	30.5%46
Derrin Boyd	1,593	534	74.9%	5.056	106.542	101.564	53.1%58	28.7%42	18.5%36	34.2%62	49.8%54	71.7%62	18.3%60	31.9%42
Deywilk Tavarez	1,253	874	58.9%	-0.946	105.340	106.352	49.9%40	30.0%46	17.0%46	33.2%58	50.8%50	67.7%44	17.8%54	25.4%62
Lazar Djokovic	1,152	975	54.2%	7.160	110.854	103.758	53.1%58	25.1%28	14.6%66	30.4%52	49.1%56	68.9%50	17.0%50	26.5%58
AJ Smith	1,122	1,006	52.7%	0.448	105.540	105.254	51.2%48	28.2%40	18.1%38	38.9%72	51.4%46	73.3%70	17.2%50	30.6%46
Justas Stonkus	815	1,312	38.3%	4.454	110.854	106.452	52.2%54	29.5%44	15.5%58	33.8%60	49.7%56	69.4%52	16.0%42	25.3%62
Elijah Jones	540	1,588	25.4%	3.854	109.550	105.754	53.1%58	27.2%36	16.6%50	34.7%62	49.2%56	69.3%52	15.4%38	24.8%64
Djordje Curcic	314	1,813	14.8%	4.554	109.350	104.756	52.5%54	29.1%42	16.5%50	34.8%64	49.3%56	69.2%50	16.5%46	25.3%62
Jaxon Prunty	179	1,948	8.4%	1.650	108.448	106.850	51.8%52	28.6%42	16.1%54	32.7%58	50.7%50	69.3%52	16.4%44	25.1%62

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.