Poss2,104
Net Rtg-13.724
ORtg110.250
DRtg123.916
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,104 | 950 | -13.724 | 110.250 | 123.916 | 54.2%58 | 26.7%38 | 17.7%34 | 38.0%62 | 57.1%24 | 63.5%24 | 15.1%42 | 35.6%40 |
| Pierre-LouisH. Pierre-LouisNessahD. NessahLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 89 | 53 | -7.832 | 98.824 | 106.652 | 45.6%22 | 28.3%44 | 16.8%40 | 21.5%20 | 46.3%72 | 56.7%10 | 15.9%48 | 13.8%94 |
| Pierre-LouisH. Pierre-LouisNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. Beard | 65 | 31 | -29.710 | 98.122 | 127.810 | 48.2%32 | 26.5%36 | 19.9%20 | 19.6%16 | 50.8%50 | 54.3%6 | 11.5%18 | 31.1%52 |
| HarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 63 | 33 | 2.850 | 117.066 | 114.234 | 50.8%42 | 54.1%100 | 19.0%26 | 16.7%10 | 51.7%48 | 60.6%16 | 18.3%66 | 23.3%74 |
| Pierre-LouisH. Pierre-LouisEmeryC. EmeryNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersBeardT. Beard | 60 | 25 | -10.628 | 119.772 | 130.38 | 68.1%96 | 18.2%12 | 19.9%20 | 94.4%100 | 66.7%4 | 70.8%54 | 16.5%52 | 27.5%62 |
| HarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. Beard | 58 | 31 | -30.910 | 110.650 | 141.52 | 55.7%66 | 32.1%60 | 19.0%26 | 11.3%4 | 67.0%4 | 76.0%74 | 12.7%26 | 46.0%18 |
| HarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 57 | 29 | -9.930 | 110.048 | 119.922 | 55.9%66 | 31.0%54 | 19.2%24 | 17.6%12 | 57.1%24 | 62.5%20 | 15.6%46 | 36.7%36 |
| EmeryC. EmeryHarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersBeardT. Beard | 56 | 27 | -9.430 | 127.084 | 136.54 | 54.2%58 | 42.9%90 | 14.3%62 | 52.1%84 | 60.4%14 | 60.0%14 | 11.1%16 | 20.8%80 |
| EmeryC. EmeryHarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. Lipscomb | 51 | 22 | 27.586 | 115.562 | 88.188 | 52.3%50 | 38.5%82 | 17.6%34 | 38.6%62 | 42.0%86 | 85.7%96 | 16.2%50 | 31.8%50 |
| EmeryC. EmeryHarrisJ. HarrisLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 49 | 21 | 1.248 | 109.246 | 107.948 | 50.0%36 | 28.0%42 | 12.1%76 | 55.0%86 | 63.6%8 | 64.7%28 | 28.0%98 | 57.6%8 |
| JonesK. JonesHarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. Beard | 42 | 17 | 75.2100 | 168.5100 | 93.380 | 75.0%100 | 58.8%100 | 12.0%76 | 47.4%78 | 46.6%70 | 83.3%94 | 17.7%62 | 48.3%16 |
| EmeryC. EmeryHarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. Beard | 38 | 12 | -3.440 | 141.198 | 144.52 | 88.1%100 | 16.7%8 | 24.0%6 | 85.7%100 | 67.9%4 | 66.7%32 | 8.3%8 | 75.0%2 |
| EmeryC. EmeryWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 36 | 14 | -26.912 | 101.228 | 128.010 | 46.0%24 | 18.8%12 | 16.9%40 | 64.0%94 | 60.7%14 | 76.9%78 | 12.2%22 | 28.6%58 |
| Pierre-LouisH. Pierre-LouisEmeryC. EmeryWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombRyanP. Ryan | 34 | 16 | 43.096 | 133.392 | 90.384 | 65.0%92 | 13.3%6 | 3.0%98 | 33.3%50 | 42.6%84 | 68.4%42 | 21.1%80 | 40.7%28 |
| HarrisJ. HarrisWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 33 | 11 | -55.02 | 68.92 | 123.916 | 40.0%8 | 46.7%96 | 38.9%0 | 20.0%16 | 56.0%28 | 68.8%44 | 13.0%28 | 56.0%8 |
| Pierre-LouisH. Pierre-LouisJonesK. JonesLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. BeardRyanP. Ryan | 31 | 17 | -2.242 | 118.168 | 120.422 | 63.0%90 | 26.7%36 | 16.0%48 | 25.9%30 | 58.9%18 | 71.4%56 | 12.0%22 | 39.3%32 |
| EmeryC. EmeryNessahD. NessahWondersF. WondersLipscombJ. LipscombBeardT. Beard | 31 | 14 | 0.546 | 111.954 | 111.540 | 50.0%36 | 17.6%10 | 9.6%88 | 33.3%50 | 48.2%64 | 70.0%48 | 7.2%6 | 28.6%58 |
| EmeryC. EmeryHarrisJ. HarrisNessahD. NessahLipscombJ. LipscombRyanP. Ryan | 31 | 13 | 1.748 | 119.972 | 118.326 | 73.9%100 | 27.3%40 | 25.9%4 | 26.1%30 | 53.4%40 | 50.0%2 | 14.3%36 | 13.8%94 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

