Cornell13-13

IvyCoach: Jon Jaques

13-13NET#145

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,318	507	72.2%	−8.122	−5.822	+2.336	−3.916	−2.034	+1.426	+4.676	+0.446	−4.612	−0.444	−10.192
Adam Hinton	1,162	662	63.7%	+3.564	+5.078	+1.540	−3.420	+1.364	−6.498	+0.152	+1.136	−0.644	+0.254	−5.980
Jacob Beccles	1,094	730	60.0%	+2.762	−2.338	−5.076	−3.220	−0.942	−2.384	+1.258	−4.488	−3.518	+0.764	−6.582
Jake Fiegen	1,068	756	58.6%	+15.194	+7.788	−7.486	−0.742	+8.098	−1.878	+5.882	−2.776	+1.464	+2.182	−3.870
Josh Baldwin	846	979	46.4%	+16.396	+6.082	−10.392	+2.072	+3.180	−0.558	−2.040	−2.978	+2.878	+2.588	+0.844
Kaspar Sepp	825	1,000	45.2%	−7.824	−12.36	−4.474	−6.46	−0.942	+0.244	+0.556	−3.684	−1.634	−0.738	−10.792
Anthony Nimani	619	1,205	33.9%	+13.592	+4.876	−8.890	+6.396	−2.628	+2.414	−0.748	−4.688	−0.644	+0.662	−7.484
DJ Nix	531	1,293	29.1%	−14.310	−8.714	+5.618	−2.128	−6.76	+0.244	−3.332	+2.028	−5.010	+0.152	−5.076
Corbin Zentner	454	1,370	24.9%	−5.032	−3.732	+1.342	+2.274	−3.520	+2.514	−0.946	+2.324	+2.778	+0.152	−1.560
Gioacchino Panzini	413	1,411	22.6%	−10.916	−3.930	+6.914	+1.062	+4.186	+4.72	−1.940	+2.820	+0.252	−2.020	+18.00
DaMaryon Fishburn	244	1,580	13.4%	−31.42	−14.24	+17.20	−0.248	−3.818	+6.60	−3.732	+7.42	+1.264	−2.216	+28.50
Mateen Rafiq	231	1,593	12.7%	+17.196	+21.6100	+4.524	+9.7100	+1.162	−3.592	−4.626	+2.324	+10.2100	−4.14	+13.62
Ian Imegwu	137	1,687	7.5%	−0.550	+13.298	+13.72	+3.182	+0.052	−3.994	+9.692	+10.30	+12.5100	−2.514	+19.90

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,318	507	72.2%	-0.046	118.470	118.424	57.6%74	29.6%50	16.4%44	31.7%46	56.2%28	67.7%40	14.8%40	34.9%42
Adam Hinton	1,162	662	63.7%	3.552	121.876	118.326	57.5%74	30.6%52	13.7%66	30.4%42	56.5%26	68.8%44	15.0%42	35.5%40
Jacob Beccles	1,094	730	60.0%	3.352	119.170	115.830	57.4%74	29.8%50	15.1%56	30.9%44	54.4%34	67.7%38	15.2%42	35.1%40
Jake Fiegen	1,068	756	58.6%	8.660	123.278	114.632	58.4%76	33.5%66	15.3%54	32.8%48	55.0%32	69.6%48	15.8%48	36.0%38
Josh Baldwin	846	979	46.4%	10.964	123.278	112.338	59.7%80	31.8%58	15.7%50	29.3%40	54.6%34	70.5%52	16.3%50	38.1%34
Kaspar Sepp	825	1,000	45.2%	-2.142	113.356	115.430	55.1%62	29.7%50	16.1%46	30.7%42	54.3%34	68.2%42	14.5%38	32.2%48
Anthony Nimani	619	1,205	33.9%	11.164	123.278	112.038	62.9%90	28.4%44	17.6%34	29.9%42	53.2%40	68.6%44	15.3%44	32.8%46
DJ Nix	531	1,293	29.1%	-7.832	113.958	121.718	57.2%72	25.5%32	16.2%46	28.1%36	57.5%22	65.5%30	15.0%42	34.2%44
Corbin Zentner	454	1,370	24.9%	-1.542	117.266	118.724	60.3%82	27.5%40	17.9%34	29.8%40	57.9%22	71.1%54	15.0%42	36.5%38
Gioacchino Panzini	413	1,411	22.6%	-6.136	117.066	123.016	59.5%80	33.3%66	19.6%22	28.9%38	58.3%20	69.2%46	13.4%30	51.5%12
DaMaryon Fishburn	244	1,580	13.4%	-24.914	107.742	132.66	58.5%76	26.9%38	21.7%14	27.2%34	62.6%10	70.1%50	13.0%28	62.6%6
Mateen Rafiq	231	1,593	12.7%	17.174	138.996	121.718	67.1%96	31.1%54	13.0%70	26.4%32	58.2%20	78.0%82	11.3%18	49.7%14
Ian Imegwu	137	1,687	7.5%	1.648	132.290	130.68	61.5%86	30.2%52	12.4%74	39.3%64	65.9%4	80.8%88	12.5%24	56.5%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,318	507	72.2%	8.160	124.280	116.130	61.4%86	31.6%58	15.0%56	27.1%34	55.9%28	72.3%60	15.2%44	45.0%20
Adam Hinton	1,162	662	63.7%	0.046	116.866	116.828	60.9%84	29.3%48	20.1%20	30.4%42	55.4%30	69.4%46	14.8%40	41.3%26
Jacob Beccles	1,094	730	60.0%	0.746	121.476	120.720	60.6%84	30.7%52	17.4%36	29.7%40	58.8%18	71.2%54	14.5%38	41.6%26
Jake Fiegen	1,068	756	58.6%	-6.534	115.562	122.018	59.1%78	25.5%32	17.1%40	27.0%32	57.7%22	68.2%42	13.7%32	39.8%30
Josh Baldwin	846	979	46.4%	-5.336	117.266	122.518	57.7%74	28.7%46	16.2%46	31.4%44	57.4%22	67.7%40	13.7%32	37.3%36
Kaspar Sepp	825	1,000	45.2%	5.756	125.682	119.822	61.6%86	30.6%52	15.9%48	30.2%42	57.9%22	69.8%48	15.2%44	42.9%24
Anthony Nimani	619	1,205	33.9%	-2.442	118.470	120.820	56.6%70	30.9%54	15.2%54	30.6%42	57.7%22	69.2%46	14.7%38	40.3%28
DJ Nix	531	1,293	29.1%	6.456	122.578	116.130	59.3%80	32.2%60	15.9%48	31.4%44	55.5%30	70.5%52	14.9%40	39.2%32
Corbin Zentner	454	1,370	24.9%	3.552	120.974	117.426	58.1%76	30.9%54	15.4%52	30.6%42	55.5%30	68.3%42	14.9%40	38.0%34
Gioacchino Panzini	413	1,411	22.6%	4.854	120.974	116.130	58.4%76	29.2%48	15.0%56	30.8%44	55.5%30	69.0%46	15.4%44	33.5%44
DaMaryon Fishburn	244	1,580	13.4%	6.556	121.976	115.430	58.7%78	30.6%52	15.1%54	30.9%44	55.2%32	68.9%44	15.2%44	34.2%44
Mateen Rafiq	231	1,593	12.7%	0.146	117.366	117.228	57.4%74	30.0%52	16.4%44	31.0%44	55.8%28	67.8%40	15.4%44	36.1%38
Ian Imegwu	137	1,687	7.5%	2.150	119.070	116.928	58.4%76	30.2%52	16.3%46	29.7%40	55.5%30	68.3%42	15.1%42	36.6%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.