Schedule
WL
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LW
LLLLLLLWL
LWLWWLLLLWLLLLLLLLLWLLLLLLLWLTeam Stats
30 games- Net Rating-9.422
- Offensive Rating103.218
- Defensive Rating112.638
- Pace64.535
- Effective FG%50.7%62
- Off Rebound Pct25.5%16
- Turnover Pct21.1%25
- FT Attempt Rate33.6%27
Team Stats
30 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-9.422
- Offensive Rating103.218
- Defensive Rating112.638
- Pace64.535
- Effective FG%50.7%62
- Off Rebound Pct25.5%16
- Turnover Pct21.1%25
- FT Attempt Rate33.6%27
Results & Margin
- Win Pct20.0%4
- Point Margin / Game-6.122
- Points / Game66.514
- Points Allowed / Game72.649
- 1st Half Margin-3.821
- 2nd Half Margin-2.326
- Avg Largest Lead6.820
- Avg Largest Deficit12.831
Box Score
- Points / Game66.514
- Rebounds / Game33.117
- Assists / Game12.030
- ORebs / Game8.27
- DRebs / Game24.950
- Steals / Game3.60
- Blocks / Game2.07
- Turnovers / Game13.625
- PFs / Game18.078
Shooting
- FGMs / Game23.319
- FGAs / Game52.95
- Field Goal Pct44.1%55
- 2PMs / Game16.315
- 2PAs / Game34.624
- 2-Point Pct47.2%34
- 3PMs / Game7.050
- 3PAs / Game18.227
- 3-Point Pct38.2%91
- FTMs / Game13.018
- FTAs / Game17.811
- Free Throw Pct73.0%82
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s49.1%38
- % Pts from 3s31.4%66
- % Pts from FTs19.5%36
- Paint Pts / Game22.354
- % Pts in Paint33.5%66
- Fast Break Pts / Game2.122
- % Pts on Fast Break3.1%23
- Points off TOVs / Game9.535
- % Pts off TOVs14.2%42
- 1st Half Pts / Game31.120
- 2nd Half Pts / Game34.29
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %54.8%62
- Points / Shot1.2656
- 3-Point Att Rate34.5%43
- Assist Pct51.4%45
- Assists / 100 Poss18.630
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.88x20
- PF Drawn / Game18.837
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%51.9%23
- Opp True Shooting %55.2%35
- Opp Field Goal Pct45.8%21
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.6%40
- Opp 3-Point Pct37.7%10
- Opp 3PA Rate32.1%81
- Opp FT Att Rate30.5%85
- Opp Points / Shot1.2556
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game72.649
- Paint Pts Allowed26.919
- Fast Break Pts Allowed5.516
- Pts off TOVs Allowed14.510
- Opp Assist Pct46.2%91
- TOVs Forced / Game9.73
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.2%76
- Turnovers Forced Pct15.0%4
- Steal Pct5.6%0
- Block Pct3.1%7
- Hakeem Pct8.7%0
- PF Efficiency0.96x70
- Steals / PF0.20x2
- Blocks / PF0.11x11
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #353P%38.2%
- #84Opp OREB%27.8%
- #111PO TOV Diff-163
- #133TS%54.3%
- #134eFG%50.7%
- #151SOS0.6
- #177Paint Pts %38.5%
- #183REB Diff-11
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
- #353P%38.2%
- #84Opp OREB%27.8%
- #111PO TOV Diff-163
- #133TS%54.3%
- #134eFG%50.7%
- #151SOS0.6
- #177Paint Pts %38.5%
- #183REB Diff-11
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
- #339Opp TOV%14.6%
- #316Opp 3P%37.7%
- #307Adj DRtg110.9
- #303TOV%20.4%
- #296OREB%25.5%
- #275Pts Diff-182
- #274Opp eFG%51.9%
- #259FTAR33.6%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2015-16- 1
Bucknell 2022-2311-20PatriotMost alike in TOV%, eFG%, 3PA rate92 - 2
North Dakota St.NDSU 2023-2412-17SummitMost alike in Opp TOV%, Adj O, 3PA rate90 - 3
Fresno St. 2023-2411-21MWCMost alike in eFG%, OREB%, FT rate83 - 4
Central ConnecticutCCSU 2025-2616-12NECMost alike in Tempo, FT rate, Adj D82 - 5
South DakotaUSD 2022-2310-19SummitMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, Opp eFG%82 - 6
Northern KentuckyNKU 2015-167-21HorizonMost alike in eFG%, OREB%, TOV%81 - 7
Dartmouth 2016-177-20IvyMost alike in Adj D, Opp OREB%, Opp eFG%80 - 8
Binghamton 2024-2512-17America EastMost alike in TOV%, eFG%, Opp TOV%80 - 9
Milwaukee 2018-197-22HorizonMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, Tempo80 - 10Binghamton 2017-189-20America EastMost alike in Opp OREB%, Tempo, FT rate80
Schedule
Loading the schedule
CRC.J.RiversSo
DominikOlejniczakFrOAOreArogundadeSoRTReedTimmerSoKAKaleAbrahamsonJrGWGrahamWoodwardSo
NickMcGlynnFr
BillyWamplerFr
JJJacob EnevoldJensenJr
DominikOlejniczakFrOAOreArogundadeSoRTReedTimmerSoKAKaleAbrahamsonJrGWGrahamWoodwardSoKMKarlMadisonSr
CSCaseySchlatterFr
NickMcGlynnFrBillyWamplerFr| C.J. Rivers | So | 6'2" | -0.151 | – | – | 55.2%65 | 12.2%13 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 44.4% | 57.1% |
| J. Enevold JensenJacob Enevold Jensen | Jr | 7'0" | -0.149 | – | – | 62.7%91 | 16.6%38 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 82.4% |
| D. OlejniczakDominik Olejniczak | Fr | 7'0" | -0.149 | – | – | 73.1%97 | 18.2%50 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 70.0% |
| O. ArogundadeOre Arogundade | So | 6'3" | -0.341 | – | – | 50.5%42 | 14.6%25 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 36.5% | 76.7% |
| R. TimmerReed Timmer | So | 6'1" | -0.341 | – | – | 58.3%80 | 26.6%94 | 16.7 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 39.8% | 80.7% |
| K. AbrahamsonKale Abrahamson | Jr | 6'8" | -0.723 | – | – | 51.2%46 | 22.4%78 | 11.1 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 33.8% | 68.2% |
| G. WoodwardGraham Woodward | So | 6'0" | -0.914 | – | – | 53.4%56 | 23.0%80 | 11.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 42.3% | 70.6% |
| K. MadisonKarl Madison | Sr | 5'11" | – | – | – | 37.3%12 | 13.8%20 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 21.4% | 66.7% |
| C. SchlatterCasey Schlatter | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 40.8%16 | 17.2%43 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| N. McGlynnNick McGlynn | Fr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 52.2%51 | 16.8%40 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 65.6% |
| B. WamplerBilly Wampler | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 55.9%69 | 18.6%53 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 45.5% | 50.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 14-20 | #189 | -1.747 | 110.860 | 112.533 | 0.567 | -3629 | -1436 | 27.1%16 | -552 | 52.1%54 | 34.2%54 | 71.9%43 |
| 24-2511 | 31-4 | #55 | 13.384 | 113.279 | 99.990 | -0.266 | +18792 | +4074 | 35.4%89 | -8988 | 54.8%87 | 36.1%81 | 70.2%30 |
| 23-2410 | 28-7 | #47 | 14.187 | 115.391 | 101.282 | 1.768 | +5561 | +4375 | 24.3%11 | -9790 | 54.9%93 | 36.6%90 | 75.3%86 |
| 22-2312 | 27-8 | #56 | 12.786 | 111.181 | 98.487 | -1.057 | +10476 | +4579 | 24.3%12 | -5377 | 53.7%87 | 37.0%90 | 76.7%93 |
| 21-22 | 25-11 | #75 | 9.678 | 109.179 | 99.577 | 0.564 | +10274 | +954 | 29.9%64 | -8887 | 52.0%71 | 34.4%61 | 75.5%87 |
| 19-20 | 20-14 | #167 | -0.349 | 103.053 | 103.247 | -0.561 | +6264 | -3623 | 23.5%13 | +2231 | 52.4%82 | 34.5%68 | 71.4%55 |
| 18-19 | 24-10 | #133 | 4.263 | 107.565 | 103.361 | -1.450 | +5464 | +5482 | 25.0%19 | +4122 | 53.9%85 | 36.1%74 | 75.7%94 |
| 17-18 | 17-17 | #164 | 0.854 | 108.264 | 107.442 | 0.162 | -7721 | +2565 | 23.6%10 | -148 | 51.0%49 | 36.4%73 | 77.0%94 |
| 16-17 | 7-24 | #257 | -8.721 | 102.138 | 110.714 | 0.564 | -11515 | +1158 | 26.9%24 | +446 | 48.2%19 | 34.5%43 | 75.6%91 |
| 15-16 | 6-24 | #266 | -8.524 | 103.043 | 111.411 | -0.357 | +1249 | -446 | 25.6%14 | +1191 | 51.5%68 | 38.5%93 | 72.2%75 |
| 14-15 | 8-22 | #291 | -10.016 | 102.045 | 111.95 | 2.270 | -10015 | -2331 | 23.4%4 | +974 | 52.8%87 | 40.8%99 | 76.8%99 |
| 13-14 | 14-16 | #179 | 0.254 | 106.555 | 106.346 | 1.064 | +3255 | +3373 | 27.2%12 | +2631 | 52.7%85 | 39.6%97 | 71.4%65 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
54.3%#129
Effective FG %
50.7%#131
3-Point %
38.2%#28
3PAR
34.5%#199
FTAR
33.6%#255
Assist %
51.4%#190
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
36.2%#157
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
28.2%#159
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
15 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0476D-I 0.99
Early 0–10s0.642041.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.274529.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.379128.9% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0144Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.715348.4% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.305029.4% of shots
Late 21s+1.292822.2% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.