American

East Carolina

11-20NET#288Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #215Coach: Michael Schwartz

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,104	984	-8.9—	101.6—	110.4—	46.3%—	33.8%—	17.6%—	38.9%—	52.3%—	67.7%—	16.4%—	31.4%—
RileyJ. RileyCasonR. CasonEmejuruG. EmejuruGardnerD. GardnerCaulkerC. Caulker	172	90	-12.0—	109.0—	120.9—	48.7%—	40.4%—	18.1%—	37.3%—	56.1%—	73.3%—	9.2%—	25.2%—
RileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDeLaurierE. DeLaurierGardnerD. GardnerCaulkerC. Caulker	111	55	-0.2—	106.4—	106.7—	51.0%—	43.5%—	23.5%—	25.0%—	54.6%—	65.5%—	21.5%—	18.4%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDeLaurierE. DeLaurierCaulkerC. Caulker	102	49	4.0—	113.8—	109.8—	51.2%—	37.5%—	16.7%—	50.6%—	59.0%—	73.3%—	20.4%—	27.7%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDeLaurierE. DeLaurierGardnerD. Gardner	95	47	-6.0—	109.6—	115.6—	48.7%—	32.7%—	13.7%—	57.1%—	53.8%—	64.0%—	14.6%—	20.9%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. EmejuruCaulkerC. Caulker	88	37	-2.5—	96.9—	99.4—	34.9%—	34.5%—	9.1%—	65.8%—	50.9%—	66.7%—	24.8%—	68.4%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruGardnerD. GardnerCaulkerC. Caulker	83	36	0.3—	113.0—	112.7—	52.3%—	17.5%—	10.8%—	52.3%—	45.3%—	70.2%—	11.4%—	65.6%—
RileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDavisL. DavisGardnerD. GardnerCaulkerC. Caulker	81	37	16.6—	125.3—	108.7—	59.3%—	36.8%—	14.9%—	21.3%—	55.1%—	71.9%—	16.6%—	19.1%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDavisL. DavisCaulkerC. Caulker	80	40	-8.4—	105.1—	113.6—	42.5%—	32.1%—	7.5%—	28.7%—	59.9%—	77.1%—	19.3%—	36.6%—
RileyJ. RileyCasonR. CasonBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. EmejuruCaulkerC. Caulker	78	43	-9.8—	101.2—	111.0—	52.3%—	25.0%—	19.2%—	26.6%—	58.9%—	73.7%—	18.9%—	16.4%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyCasonR. CasonEmejuruG. EmejuruCaulkerC. Caulker	77	35	-20.6—	89.2—	109.9—	44.0%—	30.0%—	24.6%—	44.8%—	53.8%—	61.1%—	22.9%—	41.5%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyCasonR. CasonBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. Emejuru	76	35	-57.1—	71.5—	128.5—	38.3%—	21.4%—	21.2%—	30.0%—	58.5%—	69.7%—	9.2%—	46.2%—
RileyJ. RileyBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDavisL. DavisCaulkerC. Caulker	66	37	-1.0—	108.8—	109.9—	44.2%—	53.1%—	22.7%—	65.4%—	57.4%—	63.3%—	20.5%—	14.8%—
RileyJ. RileyBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDeLaurierE. DeLaurierCaulkerC. Caulker	53	23	-42.7—	73.5—	116.2—	35.9%—	24.1%—	24.5%—	43.6%—	53.4%—	65.4%—	14.5%—	29.5%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyCasonR. CasonEmejuruG. EmejuruGardnerD. Gardner	42	19	18.4—	120.5—	102.1—	62.1%—	41.2%—	24.1%—	69.0%—	42.9%—	70.8%—	10.7%—	31.4%—
MbengI. MbengRileyJ. RileyEmejuruG. EmejuruDavisL. DavisGardnerD. Gardner	39	20	-24.7—	99.4—	124.1—	40.5%—	37.5%—	15.3%—	29.7%—	53.7%—	60.9%—	11.7%—	29.3%—
RileyJ. RileyBaileyT. BaileyEmejuruG. EmejuruCaulkerC. CaulkerD'ArcyP. D'Arcy	31	15	10.2—	108.7—	98.5—	62.5%—	7.7%—	12.8%—	37.5%—	41.9%—	54.5%—	21.1%—	9.7%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.