Eastern Michigan9-21

MACCoach: Billy Donlon

9-21NET#239

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mohammad Habhab	1,759	210	89.4%	+6.776	+7.086	+0.348	+0.656	+0.860	−3.290	+7.788	+4.98	+8.198	−1.822	−3.570
Addison Patterson	1,489	479	75.7%	+10.788	+3.268	−7.686	+1.162	+3.984	+0.148	+2.364	−6.996	−1.238	−2.812	−3.068
Carlos Hart	922	1,046	46.8%	+15.394	+6.784	−8.688	+1.870	+3.078	−0.760	+12.598	−2.070	−1.930	+4.096	−10.794
Braelon Green	895	1,073	45.5%	+2.662	+9.292	+6.614	+3.484	−1.636	−4.094	+1.660	+0.248	+1.970	−4.84	+9.88
Godslove Nwabude	868	1,101	44.1%	+4.770	+4.976	+0.248	+3.484	−0.646	−1.472	−9.510	−3.382	−7.44	−0.542	−13.896
Gregory Lawson II	791	1,177	40.2%	−0.948	−3.632	−2.764	+0.556	−2.926	+1.132	−4.726	−4.388	+3.182	−3.48	+9.110
Jon Sanders II	759	1,209	38.5%	−1.844	−4.428	−2.664	−3.122	+5.492	+2.118	+7.888	−1.060	+1.868	−0.444	−4.674
Mak Manciel	648	1,320	32.9%	−3.438	−4.128	−0.754	−1.138	−3.818	−0.150	−2.040	+2.424	+1.466	+3.594	+4.824
Mehki Ellison	527	1,441	26.8%	+2.762	+4.474	+1.638	−0.150	−0.746	−2.282	−6.320	+5.36	−0.050	+5.098	+2.734
Aidan Rubio	484	1,484	24.6%	−14.410	−6.520	+7.912	−3.518	+0.860	+1.132	+1.460	+6.92	−5.310	+4.498	+0.148
John Shanu II	387	1,581	19.7%	−15.58	−13.36	+2.236	−1.930	−2.926	+7.20	−7.814	−0.454	+2.980	−3.86	+0.348
Merritt Alderink	273	1,695	13.9%	−8.022	−3.930	+4.126	−3.120	+1.668	+0.934	−3.432	+2.524	−0.940	+1.778	+10.08

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mohammad Habhab	1,759	210	89.4%	-3.938	103.432	107.350	50.0%36	27.1%38	16.8%40	29.5%40	50.7%52	71.6%58	15.2%42	34.5%42
Addison Patterson	1,489	479	75.7%	-2.042	103.432	105.454	50.2%42	28.0%42	17.2%38	29.2%40	48.5%62	70.4%52	14.7%38	34.2%44
Carlos Hart	922	1,046	46.8%	3.552	106.238	102.762	50.9%44	28.7%46	16.8%42	35.5%56	49.1%58	69.6%48	17.5%60	29.2%58
Braelon Green	895	1,073	45.5%	-3.240	107.742	110.842	51.8%48	26.2%34	15.0%56	29.6%40	50.3%52	71.7%58	12.8%26	40.1%28
Godslove Nwabude	868	1,101	44.1%	-2.042	105.436	107.450	51.8%48	26.7%38	16.4%44	23.5%24	48.4%62	66.8%38	15.1%42	27.7%62
Gregory Lawson II	791	1,177	40.2%	-5.236	100.526	105.754	50.2%42	25.3%32	17.8%34	25.9%30	47.5%66	72.5%62	13.3%30	40.4%28
Jon Sanders II	759	1,209	38.5%	-5.836	99.926	105.754	48.0%30	30.3%52	18.5%30	33.5%52	49.6%58	71.7%58	15.1%42	32.1%48
Mak Manciel	648	1,320	32.9%	-6.934	99.926	106.852	49.2%36	24.5%28	17.1%38	27.3%34	51.8%46	71.7%58	17.8%62	38.3%34
Mehki Ellison	527	1,441	26.8%	-2.640	105.838	108.548	49.9%36	26.6%36	15.6%52	24.1%26	54.1%36	70.6%52	19.1%70	36.9%36
Aidan Rubio	484	1,484	24.6%	-15.522	97.722	113.236	47.3%28	27.6%40	18.0%34	29.8%40	55.4%30	66.5%32	18.7%68	35.0%42
John Shanu II	387	1,581	19.7%	-17.120	91.914	109.046	48.4%32	24.7%28	23.0%8	22.4%20	49.9%58	72.9%62	12.4%24	35.1%40
Merritt Alderink	273	1,695	13.9%	-11.528	99.324	110.842	47.3%28	28.4%44	17.9%34	25.7%30	52.3%44	69.9%48	16.8%56	43.6%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mohammad Habhab	1,759	210	89.4%	-10.628	96.420	107.050	49.4%36	26.3%34	20.0%20	21.8%20	45.8%72	63.5%24	17.0%56	38.0%34
Addison Patterson	1,489	479	75.7%	-12.726	100.326	113.036	49.1%36	24.1%28	17.1%38	27.0%34	55.4%30	71.6%58	17.5%60	37.2%36
Carlos Hart	922	1,046	46.8%	-11.826	99.526	111.340	49.1%36	25.7%32	17.5%36	22.9%22	51.1%50	71.6%58	13.5%30	39.9%30
Braelon Green	895	1,073	45.5%	-5.736	98.422	104.258	48.4%32	27.8%40	19.0%26	27.9%36	50.1%52	69.7%48	17.6%62	30.3%54
Godslove Nwabude	868	1,101	44.1%	-6.734	100.526	107.250	48.4%32	27.3%40	17.8%34	33.0%50	51.8%46	74.2%68	15.6%46	41.5%26
Gregory Lawson II	791	1,177	40.2%	-4.238	104.134	108.348	49.8%36	28.2%44	16.7%42	30.6%42	51.8%46	69.4%46	16.7%54	31.3%52
Jon Sanders II	759	1,209	38.5%	-4.038	104.434	108.348	51.1%44	24.9%28	16.4%44	25.7%30	50.5%52	69.9%48	15.6%46	36.7%36
Mak Manciel	648	1,320	32.9%	-3.540	104.034	107.550	50.3%42	28.3%44	17.2%38	29.3%40	49.5%58	70.2%50	14.3%36	33.5%44
Mehki Ellison	527	1,441	26.8%	-5.436	101.528	106.852	50.0%36	27.2%38	17.8%34	30.4%42	48.8%60	70.6%52	14.1%34	34.2%44
Aidan Rubio	484	1,484	24.6%	-1.144	104.234	105.354	50.8%42	26.8%38	16.9%40	28.3%38	48.5%62	71.8%58	14.3%36	34.9%42
John Shanu II	387	1,581	19.7%	-1.642	105.336	106.852	50.3%42	27.6%40	15.8%50	30.1%42	50.2%52	70.0%50	16.2%50	34.8%42
Merritt Alderink	273	1,695	13.9%	-3.640	103.232	106.752	50.4%42	26.8%38	17.0%40	29.2%40	49.8%58	70.8%52	15.2%42	33.6%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Eastern MichiganEMU9-21

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Eastern Michigan9-21