Eastern Wash.Eastern Washington8-22

Big SkyCoach: Dan Monson

8-22NET#292

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrew Cook	1,385	528	72.4%	+0.252	+11.796	+11.54	+4.792	+1.364	−3.592	−1.244	+5.46	−2.924	−0.544	+6.218
Sebastian Hartmann	1,371	542	71.7%	+12.390	+7.686	−4.774	+2.274	+2.272	−1.876	+4.176	−4.288	−1.140	−1.132	−5.880
Nic McClain	1,295	618	67.7%	−8.922	−8.314	+0.646	−2.328	−0.250	+3.58	+4.174	−0.958	−2.130	−0.544	−5.176
Mason Williams	1,188	725	62.1%	−5.730	−2.238	+3.530	+1.264	−3.720	+1.034	+0.756	+3.914	+1.566	−0.936	−4.474
Emmett Marquardt	1,085	827	56.7%	+18.298	+12.698	−5.678	+5.696	−1.142	−5.296	−6.318	−4.990	+0.860	−3.210	−4.272
Vice Zanki	783	1,130	40.9%	−0.150	−1.940	−1.860	−2.130	+1.968	+0.344	+2.968	−0.554	+1.466	+0.154	−2.866
Tyler Powell	767	1,145	40.1%	+2.460	+3.872	+1.440	+0.252	+3.682	−1.572	−5.720	+1.236	−3.618	+3.192	+8.710
Sam Stockton	558	1,354	29.2%	+5.974	−2.338	−8.286	−1.238	−3.322	−0.862	−5.224	−3.784	+5.794	+0.254	+12.44
Elijah Thomas	520	1,393	27.2%	−7.624	−3.930	+3.630	−3.022	−1.240	+0.836	+9.092	+0.444	−1.338	−0.248	+1.840
Angelo Winkel	284	1,628	14.9%	+4.368	−10.510	−14.898	−2.624	+4.988	+7.00	−1.344	−0.960	+6.896	+7.8100	+6.318
Pavlo Dziuba	169	1,744	8.8%	−25.62	−19.42	+6.118	−4.612	+1.564	+9.20	−6.020	+4.510	−0.448	+1.576	−17.198
Jackson Seale	105	1,808	5.5%	−12.114	−14.64	−2.564	−6.86	−14.92	−2.382	+4.576	−4.488	−0.050	−3.210	−12.996

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrew Cook	1,385	528	72.4%	-9.630	109.650	119.322	52.9%56	30.5%48	18.4%36	30.8%52	55.7%26	61.4%22	19.3%66	41.7%20
Sebastian Hartmann	1,371	542	71.7%	-6.136	108.648	114.730	52.2%54	30.7%50	18.9%34	32.3%56	53.0%38	62.0%24	19.1%64	38.3%26
Nic McClain	1,295	618	67.7%	-12.526	103.736	116.228	50.8%46	30.0%46	20.5%22	32.5%58	53.9%34	61.6%22	19.3%66	38.4%26
Mason Williams	1,188	725	62.1%	-11.828	105.640	117.326	52.1%54	28.6%42	19.8%26	31.4%54	55.6%26	62.9%26	19.1%64	38.3%26
Emmett Marquardt	1,085	827	56.7%	-1.744	111.956	113.634	53.9%62	29.6%44	17.1%46	28.5%44	52.1%42	62.6%26	18.0%56	38.2%26
Vice Zanki	783	1,130	40.9%	-9.730	105.340	115.030	50.4%46	31.1%52	19.5%28	32.8%58	53.9%34	63.1%26	19.5%66	38.3%26
Tyler Powell	767	1,145	40.1%	-8.232	108.748	116.926	51.7%52	32.2%56	18.5%36	27.8%42	54.9%30	60.2%18	21.3%76	45.3%16
Sam Stockton	558	1,354	29.2%	-5.438	104.838	110.242	50.7%46	27.8%38	18.8%34	27.4%42	51.5%46	66.3%38	19.6%68	49.0%12
Elijah Thomas	520	1,393	27.2%	-15.124	103.536	118.722	49.4%40	29.2%44	20.0%26	37.7%70	54.4%32	61.3%20	19.3%66	41.3%22
Angelo Winkel	284	1,628	14.9%	-6.036	97.424	103.458	49.3%40	34.3%64	25.3%6	30.0%50	53.3%36	68.2%46	26.0%94	45.5%16
Pavlo Dziuba	169	1,744	8.8%	-32.98	88.712	121.618	47.4%30	31.4%52	27.8%2	25.6%36	58.3%18	62.0%22	20.8%74	24.5%64
Jackson Seale	105	1,808	5.5%	-21.116	92.616	113.632	45.1%22	16.1%8	17.2%46	35.4%64	50.0%54	62.3%24	16.4%44	27.8%54

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Andrew Cook	1,385	528	72.4%	-9.830	97.924	107.748	48.1%34	29.1%44	22.0%16	32.0%56	50.3%50	64.3%32	19.8%68	35.5%32
Sebastian Hartmann	1,371	542	71.7%	-18.420	100.930	119.422	50.0%40	28.5%40	20.7%22	28.1%44	57.2%22	63.1%26	20.2%72	44.2%18
Nic McClain	1,295	618	67.7%	-3.640	112.056	115.728	53.1%58	30.2%48	17.0%46	28.4%44	54.8%30	63.7%30	19.7%68	43.5%18
Mason Williams	1,188	725	62.1%	-6.136	107.846	113.932	50.9%46	32.3%56	18.8%34	30.7%52	51.7%44	61.4%20	20.0%70	42.7%20
Emmett Marquardt	1,085	827	56.7%	-20.018	99.228	119.222	48.3%34	30.7%50	22.4%14	34.8%64	57.0%22	61.8%22	21.2%76	42.4%20
Vice Zanki	783	1,130	40.9%	-9.630	107.244	116.826	52.5%54	29.3%44	19.3%30	29.9%50	54.4%32	61.7%22	19.4%66	41.1%22
Tyler Powell	767	1,145	40.1%	-10.630	104.940	115.428	51.5%50	28.6%42	20.0%26	33.5%60	53.7%36	63.7%30	18.1%58	36.5%30
Sam Stockton	558	1,354	29.2%	-11.428	107.144	118.424	52.0%52	31.0%50	19.6%28	32.6%58	55.2%28	60.6%20	19.3%66	36.5%30
Elijah Thomas	520	1,393	27.2%	-7.634	107.546	115.130	52.4%54	30.4%48	19.2%32	28.8%46	54.1%34	62.6%26	19.5%66	39.5%24
Angelo Winkel	284	1,628	14.9%	-10.330	108.046	118.324	52.0%52	29.4%44	18.4%36	31.3%54	54.3%32	61.4%22	18.2%58	39.1%24
Pavlo Dziuba	169	1,744	8.8%	-7.434	108.146	115.528	52.0%52	29.9%46	18.6%36	31.6%54	53.7%34	62.3%24	19.3%66	41.6%20
Jackson Seale	105	1,808	5.5%	-9.032	107.244	116.228	51.9%52	30.9%50	19.5%28	30.9%52	54.4%32	62.3%24	19.6%68	40.7%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Eastern Wash.Eastern WashingtonE. Washington8-22

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Eastern Wash.Eastern Washington8-22