Evansville5-25

MVCCoach: David Ragland

5-25NET#310

Poss2,001

Net Rtg-17.920

ORtg97.120

DRtg115.032

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,001	996	-17.920	97.120	115.032	49.5%36	21.7%20	19.1%26	30.1%42	55.0%32	69.9%48	15.4%44	31.2%52
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayHughesJ. HughesMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	438	231	-17.220	103.132	120.322	52.0%48	20.3%16	15.8%50	19.9%16	58.0%20	65.8%32	16.4%52	23.1%74
PorterK. PorterHemenwayA. HemenwayHughesJ. HughesTurnbullC. TurnbullMoellerL. Moeller	103	55	-9.430	94.116	103.660	47.6%30	23.5%24	20.4%18	22.4%20	48.4%62	68.6%44	14.1%34	24.2%72
CaseyA. CaseyHughesJ. HughesHundleyT. HundleyMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	101	50	-9.730	119.372	129.110	61.1%86	24.4%28	18.7%28	59.7%90	54.8%32	67.3%38	10.5%14	37.2%36
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayHughesJ. HughesHundleyT. HundleyMoellerL. Moeller	78	39	-22.316	91.614	113.834	45.3%22	19.0%14	16.8%42	28.1%36	51.5%48	69.0%46	12.9%26	41.8%26
HemenwayA. HemenwayHughesJ. HughesTurnbullC. TurnbullMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	69	35	-17.220	75.94	93.180	36.6%6	21.4%20	19.0%26	32.1%48	44.4%78	80.6%88	18.3%66	42.6%24
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayDyson-MerweJ. Dyson-MerweMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	60	28	-23.714	65.22	89.086	34.8%4	18.2%12	26.8%2	17.4%12	45.1%76	83.9%94	14.0%34	13.7%94
CaseyA. CaseyPorterK. PorterHughesJ. HughesMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	53	25	-8.832	107.742	116.528	48.8%34	26.9%38	15.1%54	56.1%88	53.0%40	62.1%20	12.9%26	34.0%44
CaseyA. CaseyPorterK. PorterHemenwayA. HemenwayHughesJ. HughesMoellerL. Moeller	46	24	-33.28	77.84	111.042	34.9%4	20.0%14	10.8%84	20.9%18	53.5%38	70.8%54	17.1%58	14.0%92
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayTurnbullC. TurnbullMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	41	21	-15.122	99.626	114.632	56.5%70	25.0%28	21.9%12	41.9%70	60.3%14	66.7%32	22.4%86	51.7%12
CaseyA. CaseyHundleyT. HundleyBerridgeK. BerridgeDyson-MerweJ. Dyson-MerweQuinetB. Quinet	40	21	8.660	110.450	101.864	47.5%28	34.8%68	12.5%74	15.0%8	48.5%62	65.0%28	18.8%68	20.6%82
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayHundleyT. HundleyBerridgeK. BerridgeMoellerL. Moeller	38	20	-34.78	108.544	143.22	55.0%62	18.8%12	18.5%30	26.7%32	67.9%4	58.8%14	13.0%28	7.7%98
HughesJ. HughesHundleyT. HundleyBerridgeK. BerridgeMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	37	18	-15.822	125.082	140.82	67.2%96	6.7%2	13.6%66	27.6%34	61.8%10	76.5%76	2.9%2	23.5%74
CaseyA. CaseyPorterK. PorterHemenwayA. HemenwayTurnbullC. TurnbullMoellerL. Moeller	37	17	-9.430	122.878	132.26	59.7%80	42.1%90	19.1%26	45.2%76	53.0%40	57.9%12	12.0%22	27.3%62
CaseyA. CaseyHughesJ. HughesHundleyT. HundleyBerridgeK. BerridgeMoellerL. Moeller	31	14	-11.926	111.752	123.616	60.0%82	28.6%46	22.3%12	28.0%36	51.7%46	53.3%6	15.1%42	44.8%20
CaseyA. CaseyHemenwayA. HemenwayHundleyT. HundleyMoellerL. MoellerQuinetB. Quinet	30	13	10.764	121.876	111.142	63.5%90	23.1%24	16.5%44	19.2%14	61.4%12	90.9%98	17.9%62	18.2%86

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.