Fairfield20-13

MAACCoach: Chris Casey

20-13NET#233

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Sparks	1,772	334	84.1%	+15.094	+10.994	−4.272	+4.590	+1.870	−3.190	−7.216	−4.790	+2.172	−3.66	−0.352
Declan Wucherpfennig	1,668	439	79.2%	+12.290	+4.776	−7.586	+1.768	+0.454	−0.558	+2.364	−4.388	+0.152	+0.662	+0.844
Brandon Benjamin	1,576	530	74.8%	+2.460	+5.178	+2.732	+2.476	−0.844	−1.776	−3.134	−1.666	−1.436	−2.416	+2.932
Deuce Turner	1,072	1,035	50.9%	−7.224	−0.448	+6.714	+2.274	−3.420	+1.820	−0.152	+3.218	−0.150	−3.76	−12.294
Eric Mejia	1,006	1,101	47.8%	−1.942	+0.956	+2.832	+0.860	+1.770	+2.216	+6.784	+0.840	+1.970	−0.936	+6.816
Tony Williams	993	1,113	47.2%	+0.452	−2.438	−2.866	−1.634	−1.736	−2.384	−7.116	+0.742	−2.328	+4.296	−0.150
Halon Rawlins	841	1,266	39.9%	+4.568	+1.358	−3.166	−0.050	+3.684	−1.268	−7.016	−0.150	−1.932	+3.394	+0.646
Isaac Munkadi	467	1,640	22.2%	+1.758	−3.532	−5.278	−2.130	+1.566	+1.822	+3.974	−0.252	−0.446	+2.386	−4.574
Ryan Zan	363	1,743	17.2%	−18.46	−4.328	+14.12	−0.150	−4.216	+0.146	+0.756	+6.24	−3.916	−0.836	−0.250
Cam Estevez	346	1,761	16.4%	−12.812	−1.344	+11.54	−1.734	−1.438	+0.048	+3.170	+2.920	−1.040	−4.54	+5.022
Nasir Rodriguez	241	1,865	11.4%	+1.758	−11.18	−12.896	−4.910	−2.132	+2.812	+13.398	−6.896	+2.778	+4.498	+10.08
Michael Rogan	169	1,937	8.0%	−0.350	−6.718	−6.482	−6.16	+5.290	+0.738	+4.374	+2.820	+8.4100	+2.790	−4.374

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Sparks	1,772	334	84.1%	4.354	110.750	106.452	49.7%36	36.0%72	14.8%58	26.8%32	50.8%52	71.3%56	16.3%50	31.0%52
Declan Wucherpfennig	1,668	439	79.2%	4.554	110.048	105.554	49.4%36	35.8%72	15.2%54	28.4%38	50.6%52	71.0%54	17.0%56	31.2%52
Brandon Benjamin	1,576	530	74.8%	2.550	110.350	107.848	49.6%36	35.5%72	14.9%56	27.1%34	51.1%50	70.7%52	16.3%50	31.8%50
Deuce Turner	1,072	1,035	50.9%	-1.642	108.846	110.442	50.2%42	33.9%66	16.2%46	27.8%36	53.0%40	71.0%54	15.0%42	25.3%68
Eric Mejia	1,006	1,101	47.8%	0.948	109.548	108.548	49.4%36	36.6%74	16.5%44	31.5%46	51.9%46	72.0%58	16.4%52	34.6%42
Tony Williams	993	1,113	47.2%	2.150	107.742	105.654	48.2%32	34.8%68	14.1%62	24.3%26	51.9%46	69.8%48	19.0%70	31.0%52
Halon Rawlins	841	1,266	39.9%	4.654	109.848	105.254	49.0%34	37.8%78	14.6%58	23.8%24	51.5%48	69.9%48	18.8%70	31.4%50
Isaac Munkadi	467	1,640	22.2%	3.252	106.338	103.160	47.4%28	36.9%76	16.7%42	30.9%44	51.4%48	70.7%52	18.6%68	27.6%62
Ryan Zan	363	1,743	17.2%	-13.326	105.536	118.824	48.9%34	32.2%60	15.4%52	28.4%38	56.6%26	67.8%40	16.2%50	30.9%52
Cam Estevez	346	1,761	16.4%	-8.930	107.942	116.828	47.6%30	34.5%68	15.3%54	30.5%42	53.9%36	70.2%50	13.0%28	35.3%40
Nasir Rodriguez	241	1,865	11.4%	3.552	99.224	95.776	44.7%20	33.8%66	17.8%34	39.8%66	45.4%74	73.4%66	20.7%80	40.0%30
Michael Rogan	169	1,937	8.0%	1.748	102.832	101.166	43.4%16	40.4%86	16.0%48	31.9%46	54.1%36	78.8%82	19.4%72	27.1%64

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Sparks	1,772	334	84.1%	-10.728	99.926	110.642	45.2%20	34.2%66	17.9%34	34.0%52	55.5%30	69.2%46	19.9%76	31.3%52
Declan Wucherpfennig	1,668	439	79.2%	-7.732	105.336	113.036	47.7%30	35.4%70	15.7%50	26.1%30	54.9%32	70.9%54	16.4%52	30.4%54
Brandon Benjamin	1,576	530	74.8%	0.246	105.236	105.156	47.2%28	36.3%74	16.6%44	30.2%42	52.7%42	72.0%60	18.6%68	28.9%58
Deuce Turner	1,072	1,035	50.9%	5.554	109.246	103.760	47.9%30	37.4%76	14.4%60	27.9%36	49.8%58	71.0%54	18.7%68	37.5%34
Eric Mejia	1,006	1,101	47.8%	2.950	108.644	105.754	48.7%34	34.9%68	14.3%62	24.8%26	51.1%50	70.1%50	17.3%58	27.8%62
Tony Williams	993	1,113	47.2%	1.748	110.148	108.448	49.8%36	36.5%74	16.4%44	31.3%44	51.2%50	72.0%60	14.9%40	31.1%52
Halon Rawlins	841	1,266	39.9%	0.146	108.544	108.448	49.0%34	34.2%66	15.8%50	30.8%44	51.5%48	71.7%58	15.5%44	30.8%52
Isaac Munkadi	467	1,640	22.2%	1.548	109.848	108.248	49.5%36	35.3%70	14.9%56	27.1%34	51.5%48	71.1%54	16.3%52	32.1%50
Ryan Zan	363	1,743	17.2%	5.154	109.748	104.656	49.0%34	36.4%74	15.3%54	27.8%36	50.4%52	71.7%58	17.0%56	31.1%52
Cam Estevez	346	1,761	16.4%	4.052	109.246	105.254	49.3%36	35.9%72	15.3%54	27.4%34	51.0%50	71.2%54	17.6%60	30.2%54
Nasir Rodriguez	241	1,865	11.4%	1.848	110.350	108.548	49.5%36	35.9%72	15.0%56	26.5%32	52.2%44	70.7%52	16.4%52	30.0%54
Michael Rogan	169	1,937	8.0%	2.048	109.548	107.650	49.5%36	35.2%70	15.3%54	27.5%34	51.3%48	70.4%50	16.6%54	31.4%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.