Florida Gulf Coast11-18

ASUNCoach: Patrick Chambers

11-18NET#243

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zach Anderson	1,300	245	84.1%	−2.142	+1.658	+3.730	+1.566	+0.456	+0.540	−5.522	+1.336	+3.784	−3.012	−10.290
Dallion Johnson	1,178	367	76.2%	+0.552	−8.714	−9.288	−2.626	−4.616	−0.252	−8.312	−8.698	−2.528	−0.938	−6.882
Keeshawn Kellman	987	559	63.9%	+6.976	+9.290	+2.336	+5.292	+6.292	+1.724	−3.134	+2.326	+3.380	−1.034	−3.066
Isaiah Thompson	924	621	59.8%	+5.470	+10.694	+5.222	+6.696	−3.622	−0.352	+6.886	+6.84	+7.196	−1.034	−3.870
Franco Miller Jr.	880	666	56.9%	−4.834	−5.324	−0.552	−2.526	−2.330	−0.354	+2.364	+0.544	+2.372	−0.938	+2.136
Rahmir Barno	771	775	49.9%	−4.834	−8.614	−3.868	−2.624	−4.018	+1.526	+0.956	−1.564	−1.834	+3.994	+5.322
Cyrus Largie	736	810	47.6%	+15.994	+14.998	−1.054	+4.188	+11.8100	+0.344	+5.582	−2.676	−2.528	−1.330	−0.150
Dakota Rivers	312	1,234	20.2%	−7.326	−12.18	−4.774	−2.426	−9.62	−0.352	−2.140	−1.766	−3.222	+2.182	−3.368
Blaise Vespe	291	1,255	18.8%	+12.188	+5.478	−6.780	+0.050	+1.262	−2.582	+6.986	−3.482	−0.248	+1.978	+6.218
Chase Johnston	184	1,362	11.9%	−35.32	−13.56	+21.80	−9.22	+2.876	−0.760	−8.612	+8.60	−13.52	−0.248	+14.72
Josiah Shackleford	135	1,410	8.8%	−15.610	−16.14	−0.552	−9.82	−4.616	−0.658	−1.444	+0.940	−0.446	+0.864	−3.468

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zach Anderson	1,300	245	84.1%	-2.042	109.652	111.638	52.9%58	31.6%54	17.6%42	25.2%36	52.8%38	69.0%50	16.2%46	26.4%58
Dallion Johnson	1,178	367	76.2%	-1.444	107.346	108.744	52.1%56	30.4%50	17.5%42	24.1%32	50.6%48	67.7%44	16.5%48	26.6%56
Keeshawn Kellman	987	559	63.9%	0.948	112.760	111.736	54.6%66	33.9%64	18.1%38	24.9%36	53.4%36	69.6%52	16.4%46	27.0%56
Isaiah Thompson	924	621	59.8%	0.648	113.662	113.034	55.5%70	29.9%46	17.4%42	28.9%48	55.3%26	71.3%60	16.4%46	26.6%56
Franco Miller Jr.	880	666	56.9%	-3.640	107.146	110.740	51.6%52	30.5%50	17.4%44	27.1%42	52.7%38	69.3%52	16.4%46	29.0%48
Rahmir Barno	771	775	49.9%	-3.940	105.040	109.044	51.3%50	29.5%46	18.3%38	26.5%40	51.7%42	67.4%42	18.7%62	30.9%44
Cyrus Largie	736	810	47.6%	6.858	117.270	110.440	54.8%68	37.6%78	17.7%42	28.9%48	51.2%46	67.0%42	16.1%44	28.1%52
Dakota Rivers	312	1,234	20.2%	-7.534	99.728	107.248	50.7%48	23.8%24	17.3%44	24.3%34	51.2%46	65.8%36	18.4%60	25.5%60
Blaise Vespe	291	1,255	18.8%	8.260	113.862	105.652	52.7%58	32.5%58	15.5%56	31.7%56	49.8%54	68.1%46	18.3%60	33.1%36
Chase Johnston	184	1,362	11.9%	-32.610	97.524	130.18	44.7%22	33.9%64	16.9%46	18.5%18	60.1%12	56.2%10	16.6%48	41.1%20
Josiah Shackleford	135	1,410	8.8%	-15.824	94.620	110.540	43.8%20	27.4%36	17.0%46	24.8%34	53.3%36	67.9%44	17.5%54	25.0%62

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zach Anderson	1,300	245	84.1%	0.146	108.048	107.946	51.4%50	31.2%52	17.1%44	30.7%52	51.5%44	65.2%34	19.2%66	36.6%28
Dallion Johnson	1,178	367	76.2%	-1.944	115.968	117.824	54.7%66	35.1%68	17.7%42	32.4%58	59.1%14	70.3%56	17.4%54	33.3%34
Keeshawn Kellman	987	559	63.9%	-6.036	103.538	109.542	49.4%42	27.7%38	16.5%50	28.0%44	51.1%46	66.3%38	17.4%54	30.0%46
Isaiah Thompson	924	621	59.8%	-4.738	103.036	107.846	48.9%40	33.5%62	17.7%40	22.1%28	48.5%58	64.3%30	17.4%52	30.4%44
Franco Miller Jr.	880	666	56.9%	1.248	112.358	111.238	54.1%64	32.9%58	17.7%40	24.7%34	52.3%40	66.9%42	17.3%52	26.9%56
Rahmir Barno	771	775	49.9%	0.948	113.662	112.734	54.0%64	33.5%62	16.8%48	25.6%38	53.3%36	69.2%50	14.9%36	25.6%60
Cyrus Largie	736	810	47.6%	-9.232	102.234	111.438	50.7%48	25.8%30	17.4%44	23.4%30	53.9%32	69.6%54	17.4%54	28.2%52
Dakota Rivers	312	1,234	20.2%	-0.146	111.858	111.936	53.2%60	33.4%62	17.6%42	26.5%40	52.9%38	69.0%50	16.3%46	28.8%50
Blaise Vespe	291	1,255	18.8%	-3.940	108.348	112.336	52.7%58	31.3%52	18.0%38	24.8%34	53.2%36	68.3%48	16.4%46	26.9%56
Chase Johnston	184	1,362	11.9%	2.752	110.954	108.346	53.9%64	31.1%52	17.6%42	27.2%42	51.5%44	69.7%54	16.8%48	26.4%58
Josiah Shackleford	135	1,410	8.8%	-0.246	110.854	110.938	53.6%62	32.0%56	17.6%42	26.2%38	52.5%40	68.3%48	16.7%48	28.4%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Florida Gulf CoastFGCU11-18

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Florida Gulf Coast11-18