Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Florida St. logoFlorida St. logoFlorida St. logoFlorida St. logo

Florida St.17-15

ACCCoach: Leonard Hamilton

17-15NET#90

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jamir Watkins−8.422−3.532+4.924−2.724−5.212−1.572+4.778+4.012+4.086+0.762+2.634
Malique Ewin+16.396+9.190−7.284+3.584+3.380−1.066−2.238−0.858+3.784+3.192+0.446
Daquan Davis−2.342+1.560+3.928−0.644+0.354−0.456+1.964+1.928+1.364+0.356+4.824
Taylor Bol Bowen−5.232−2.636+2.634−0.644+2.978+2.218−10.18+1.830−2.824+1.880+0.150
Chandler Jackson+9.684−0.648−10.192−0.644−3.720−1.978−3.930−1.262+5.392+1.880−3.970
Justin Thomas+9.484+9.492−0.050+6.096−0.250−1.470+8.090−0.958−1.636−1.034+5.620
Jerry Deng−1.744+2.766+4.426−1.238−1.538−4.696−0.848−0.252−1.042−1.428+6.716
Bostyn Holt+7.678+3.872−3.870+1.062+5.692−0.354−8.412−2.272−4.514+1.068−9.590
Alier Maluk−12.214−6.220+5.920−2.426−1.934+0.936+2.968+5.84+1.466−0.936−15.998
AJ Swinton+1.958+1.358−0.652+2.374−0.944+2.020+9.492−1.666+0.758−2.614−7.284
Christian Nitu−3.738−15.24−11.694−4.214−7.26+1.824−1.344−11.898−3.320−1.624+3.728

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jamir Watkins1.148107.244106.15250.4%4631.0%5017.6%4240.3%7449.6%5666.9%4219.2%6438.0%28
Malique Ewin9.262111.456102.26252.3%5433.5%6217.5%4238.4%7048.4%6067.5%4220.2%7237.6%28
Daquan Davis2.150108.648106.55250.7%4632.3%5617.7%4240.0%7449.4%5666.5%3819.2%6439.4%24
Taylor Bol Bowen0.848106.944106.05250.7%4633.4%6218.8%3435.2%6449.4%5664.8%3419.8%6837.4%28
Chandler Jackson7.160107.746100.66650.7%4630.6%5017.1%4637.6%7048.1%6268.3%4619.8%6835.7%32
Justin Thomas7.260112.156105.05453.7%6232.1%5617.3%4442.9%7848.3%6265.3%3618.6%6039.9%24
Jerry Deng1.950109.752107.84850.2%4631.3%5214.9%6438.8%7248.5%6065.4%3618.1%5841.8%20
Bostyn Holt8.562110.754102.26251.7%5036.1%7017.7%4233.3%6047.1%6662.8%2619.8%6830.7%46
Alier Maluk-6.236103.336109.54449.2%3830.8%5018.6%3641.5%7653.0%3867.0%4218.4%6025.6%62
AJ Swinton4.554109.050104.55652.8%5631.4%5219.5%3046.7%8447.5%6466.5%3817.0%5031.9%42
Christian Nitu-0.24694.61894.87647.3%3025.9%3019.5%3038.1%7038.4%9063.2%2617.6%5440.6%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jamir Watkins9.564110.754101.26453.1%5836.3%7019.1%3235.6%6645.6%7262.9%2618.5%6035.4%34
Malique Ewin-7.134102.334109.54448.8%3630.2%4818.6%3640.6%7649.1%5663.8%3017.2%5037.1%28
Daquan Davis4.454107.144102.76051.4%5032.0%5618.2%3838.1%7047.6%6465.2%3418.9%6234.5%36
Taylor Bol Bowen6.158109.550103.55851.4%5030.5%4816.6%5045.2%8247.6%6467.6%4418.0%5637.4%28
Chandler Jackson-2.442108.348110.84051.3%5034.3%6419.0%3241.5%7649.4%5663.0%2618.1%5839.6%24
Justin Thomas-2.244102.734105.05447.7%3232.3%5618.7%3434.9%6449.2%5666.9%4219.6%6834.3%36
Jerry Deng3.654107.044103.45851.4%5032.7%5819.5%2839.5%7448.7%5866.3%3819.6%6835.0%34
Bostyn Holt0.948106.944106.15250.7%4630.6%5018.0%4041.7%7649.3%5667.4%4218.8%6240.2%22
Alier Maluk6.058109.550103.55851.6%5032.7%5817.7%4238.5%7247.2%6665.7%3619.3%6641.5%20
AJ Swinton2.652107.746105.15450.5%4632.4%5617.5%4437.3%6849.0%5865.8%3819.6%6839.1%26
Christian Nitu3.452109.852106.45251.5%5033.1%5817.7%4239.4%7250.2%5066.5%3819.3%6636.9%30
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.