Georgetown17-17

Big EastCoach: Ed Cooley

17-17NET#91

Poss2,280

Net Rtg3.252

ORtg107.244

DRtg104.058

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,280	1,144	3.252	107.244	104.058	50.4%46	33.8%62	17.3%44	25.5%36	49.7%56	68.0%46	19.8%68	29.7%48
FielderD. FielderSorberT. SorberMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. Peavy	234	124	33.392	118.272	84.990	53.9%62	48.4%96	21.8%16	27.8%42	41.8%84	66.7%38	24.9%90	19.4%80
FielderD. FielderMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. Burks	224	116	-2.542	122.280	124.714	56.7%74	24.8%26	8.9%92	24.4%32	58.8%16	70.6%58	13.8%26	32.0%42
FielderD. FielderSorberT. SorberMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. Williams	170	89	0.548	90.012	89.586	45.3%24	29.3%44	21.2%20	15.3%10	41.1%86	73.1%70	15.8%40	21.1%74
SorberT. SorberMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. Burks	155	72	33.792	122.078	88.386	57.0%74	40.5%84	18.1%38	32.4%56	39.5%90	67.0%42	22.9%84	32.6%40
SorberT. SorberMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. WilliamsWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	110	56	9.062	105.842	96.974	51.1%48	33.3%62	20.1%26	38.5%72	50.6%50	67.3%42	26.8%94	28.2%54
FielderD. FielderMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. WilliamsWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	67	33	-4.040	116.868	120.820	55.5%68	30.6%48	13.5%72	15.6%12	57.0%22	63.0%26	23.9%88	88.4%0
MackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. BurksWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	66	33	-2.542	112.258	114.730	49.2%38	36.6%72	13.6%72	37.7%70	57.8%20	71.0%60	16.4%44	25.9%60
SorberT. SorberMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. Williams	64	37	-15.822	97.924	113.732	44.5%20	37.5%74	18.7%34	10.9%6	57.8%20	61.3%20	25.8%92	41.2%22
FielderD. FielderSorberT. SorberEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. Williams	60	31	37.294	117.068	79.894	67.3%96	20.0%14	18.4%36	16.3%12	42.7%82	80.6%92	22.3%82	29.2%50
SorberT. SorberMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. BurksWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	59	31	13.370	97.824	84.690	52.9%58	27.3%36	21.9%16	17.6%16	42.0%84	68.6%48	24.2%88	19.6%78
MackM. MackWilliamsC. WilliamsBurksJ. BurksWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.McKennaD. McKenna	58	28	-28.710	102.334	131.08	49.1%38	40.0%80	12.1%80	24.1%32	57.7%20	75.0%76	16.1%42	41.0%22
FielderD. FielderSorberT. SorberMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	46	24	-10.630	97.122	107.848	48.8%38	52.0%98	32.4%0	17.1%14	42.9%82	65.7%36	13.5%24	42.9%20
FielderD. FielderEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. BurksWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	44	21	-9.730	99.528	109.244	47.5%32	29.6%44	15.8%56	27.5%42	58.3%18	58.8%16	23.1%84	44.4%16
FielderD. FielderMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyWilliamsC. Williams	39	20	-24.814	107.846	132.66	55.6%68	20.0%14	15.4%60	5.6%2	52.6%40	59.1%16	5.3%2	30.8%46
FielderD. FielderMackM. MackPeavyM. PeavyBurksJ. BurksWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	38	18	-19.218	96.322	115.528	56.7%74	12.5%4	23.4%12	10.0%4	53.8%34	86.4%98	4.6%2	22.5%72
FielderD. FielderMackM. MackEppsJ. EppsPeavyM. PeavyWilliams Jr.C. Williams Jr.	37	16	-6.336	80.46	86.688	38.6%8	20.0%14	10.7%86	20.0%20	46.0%70	88.2%100	18.6%60	28.0%54

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.