Georgetown17-17

Big EastCoach: Ed Cooley

17-17NET#91

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Peavy	1,977	303	86.7%	+9.584	+0.252	−9.390	+3.182	+1.666	+4.44	−0.848	−5.192	−1.636	+1.474	−0.854
Malik Mack	1,877	403	82.3%	−7.924	+2.566	+10.46	−0.446	+0.758	−1.572	−6.716	+4.112	+3.382	−3.010	+1.640
Jayden Epps	1,391	889	61.0%	+5.672	+6.282	+0.646	+1.162	−1.736	−3.592	+5.180	+2.028	−2.328	+1.170	−5.478
Thomas Sorber	1,253	1,026	55.0%	+26.4100	+1.760	−24.798	+2.376	+8.698	+6.50	−0.052	−12.498	−2.130	+6.1100	−7.886
Drew Fielder	1,223	1,057	53.6%	−0.548	−2.140	−1.658	+1.264	−4.018	−0.556	−7.614	−0.858	+3.986	−2.812	−2.866
Jordan Burks	1,074	1,206	47.1%	−5.530	+5.880	+11.36	+2.678	−2.330	−2.786	+3.572	+5.84	+0.354	−2.614	+3.828
Caleb Williams	978	1,302	42.9%	−2.840	−9.610	−6.882	−4.014	−2.332	+1.232	−4.826	−1.868	+1.162	+2.284	−0.654
Curtis Williams Jr.	860	1,420	37.7%	−4.834	−2.338	+2.536	+0.252	−1.638	+0.246	+2.266	+1.830	+2.676	+0.356	+8.410
Kayvaun Mulready	282	1,998	12.4%	−2.042	+4.274	+6.218	−2.822	+4.084	−2.886	+10.794	+3.516	−3.718	+1.170	+3.330
Drew McKenna	249	2,031	10.9%	−23.44	−0.846	+22.60	−3.418	−0.250	−2.886	+5.580	+9.20	−2.526	−4.92	+1.838
Julius Halaifonua	127	2,153	5.6%	−18.66	−18.72	−0.050	−9.72	+1.868	+4.92	−1.046	−3.986	−5.510	−3.310	−13.896

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Peavy	1,977	303	86.7%	4.454	107.244	102.860	50.8%46	34.0%62	17.9%40	25.4%36	49.0%58	67.9%44	19.9%70	29.6%48
Malik Mack	1,877	403	82.3%	1.750	107.646	105.952	50.3%46	33.9%62	17.1%46	24.4%32	50.4%50	68.7%48	19.2%64	30.0%46
Jayden Epps	1,391	889	61.0%	5.456	109.650	104.256	50.8%46	33.1%58	16.0%54	27.5%42	50.5%50	67.1%42	20.2%72	27.6%54
Thomas Sorber	1,253	1,026	55.0%	15.172	107.946	92.880	51.4%50	37.8%76	20.3%24	25.5%36	44.2%78	67.2%42	22.5%82	26.2%60
Drew Fielder	1,223	1,057	53.6%	3.052	106.242	103.360	50.9%46	31.9%54	17.1%46	22.0%26	49.3%56	69.8%54	18.5%60	28.4%52
Jordan Burks	1,074	1,206	47.1%	0.448	110.352	109.942	51.8%52	32.5%56	15.9%56	27.4%42	52.7%40	68.2%46	18.4%60	31.7%42
Caleb Williams	978	1,302	42.9%	1.650	101.732	100.168	48.1%34	32.5%56	18.0%40	22.8%28	48.6%58	68.7%48	21.0%76	29.3%50
Curtis Williams Jr.	860	1,420	37.7%	0.246	105.842	105.654	50.5%46	32.8%58	17.4%44	26.9%40	50.8%50	69.7%54	20.0%70	35.1%34
Kayvaun Mulready	282	1,998	12.4%	1.450	110.954	109.544	47.9%32	37.2%74	14.9%64	34.9%64	52.7%40	64.8%34	20.7%74	32.6%40
Drew McKenna	249	2,031	10.9%	-17.620	106.542	124.214	47.4%30	33.6%62	14.9%64	30.4%52	57.8%20	65.8%38	15.4%38	31.3%44
Julius Halaifonua	127	2,153	5.6%	-14.424	89.612	104.058	41.2%12	35.4%68	22.0%16	24.6%32	46.0%70	63.0%26	16.7%46	16.8%86

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Micah Peavy	1,977	303	86.7%	-5.038	107.144	112.136	47.7%32	32.4%56	13.5%72	26.2%38	54.2%34	69.4%52	18.6%60	30.4%46
Malik Mack	1,877	403	82.3%	9.664	105.140	95.576	50.7%46	33.2%58	18.6%36	31.1%54	46.3%70	65.3%36	22.3%82	28.4%52
Jayden Epps	1,391	889	61.0%	-0.246	103.436	103.758	49.7%40	34.8%66	19.5%30	22.4%26	48.5%60	69.4%52	19.1%64	33.0%38
Thomas Sorber	1,253	1,026	55.0%	-11.328	106.342	117.624	49.1%38	29.2%44	13.7%70	25.5%36	56.5%24	69.3%52	16.4%44	34.0%36
Drew Fielder	1,223	1,057	53.6%	3.554	108.348	104.954	49.7%40	35.8%70	17.6%42	29.6%48	50.1%50	65.9%38	21.3%76	31.2%44
Jordan Burks	1,074	1,206	47.1%	5.958	104.538	98.670	49.1%38	34.8%66	18.6%36	23.9%30	46.9%66	67.9%46	21.0%76	27.9%54
Caleb Williams	978	1,302	42.9%	4.454	111.354	106.950	52.1%54	34.8%66	16.8%48	27.6%42	50.4%50	67.6%44	18.8%62	30.0%48
Curtis Williams Jr.	860	1,420	37.7%	5.056	108.146	103.160	50.3%46	34.4%64	17.3%44	24.7%34	49.0%58	67.1%42	19.6%68	26.6%58
Kayvaun Mulready	282	1,998	12.4%	3.452	106.744	103.260	50.7%46	33.2%58	17.7%42	24.2%32	49.3%56	68.5%48	19.6%68	29.3%50
Drew McKenna	249	2,031	10.9%	5.756	107.344	101.664	50.7%46	33.8%62	17.6%42	24.9%34	48.7%58	68.3%46	20.3%72	29.5%48
Julius Halaifonua	127	2,153	5.6%	4.254	108.248	104.058	50.9%46	33.6%62	17.0%46	25.6%36	49.9%54	68.4%48	19.9%70	30.6%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.