Georgia Tech14-18

ACCCoach: Damon Stoudamire

14-18NET#141

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Miles Kelly	1,369	293	82.4%	+2.560	−2.338	−4.874	+1.668	−2.530	+0.442	−7.018	+2.624	+4.086	+4.296	+6.418
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	1,357	305	81.7%	−3.438	−4.328	−1.054	−3.220	−1.934	−2.884	−1.544	−1.968	−0.942	−0.938	+2.934
Naithan George	1,149	512	69.2%	−4.036	−3.930	+0.148	+0.658	−8.64	−2.884	−8.512	−1.160	+2.574	−1.726	−3.468
Baye Ndongo	1,069	593	64.3%	−7.226	−6.818	+0.346	−0.050	−3.820	+2.714	−3.234	+3.318	+6.996	−0.248	−3.166
Kyle Sturdivant	788	874	47.4%	+8.880	+7.486	−1.456	+0.758	+4.586	+0.540	+9.994	−0.252	−0.448	+1.574	+3.232
Tafara Gapare	666	996	40.1%	+3.564	−2.140	−5.576	+1.566	−2.828	+3.112	+3.170	−3.280	+1.364	−1.626	+1.738
Ty Claude	655	1,007	39.4%	+0.652	+3.970	+3.332	+2.778	+2.774	+1.822	+2.968	+0.642	−0.150	−2.912	−4.572
Dallan Coleman	542	1,120	32.6%	+15.292	+14.298	−1.154	+2.676	+7.696	−3.488	+6.384	+0.544	−2.430	+3.492	−4.372
Ibrahima Sacko	239	1,422	14.4%	+2.360	−10.710	−13.094	−7.94	+0.152	−1.368	−5.722	−9.398	−4.316	+2.180	+8.610
Ebenezer Dowuona	230	1,432	13.8%	−17.48	−5.424	+12.04	−2.624	−3.026	−2.076	−12.94	+2.426	−7.46	−2.418	−3.368
Carter Murphy	124	1,538	7.4%	−12.314	+5.378	+17.60	+0.354	+4.486	−2.280	−2.438	+5.28	−8.34	−0.740	+3.032
Amaree Abram	121	1,540	7.3%	−17.96	−6.620	+11.36	−5.310	+9.198	+5.22	+15.398	+4.910	−4.514	−0.052	−0.048

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Miles Kelly	1,369	293	82.4%	-4.440	107.046	111.538	49.6%42	34.2%64	17.5%42	26.6%40	50.2%48	68.8%48	14.1%30	31.8%40
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	1,357	305	81.7%	-5.538	106.644	112.136	48.7%38	34.4%64	16.9%46	27.6%44	49.4%54	67.8%44	13.2%26	31.0%42
Naithan George	1,149	512	69.2%	-6.136	106.244	112.334	49.5%42	31.8%56	16.5%50	25.2%36	49.4%54	68.7%48	12.9%24	29.5%48
Baye Ndongo	1,069	593	64.3%	-7.434	105.040	112.434	49.3%40	33.3%58	18.3%36	26.7%40	51.0%46	70.5%56	13.3%26	29.4%48
Kyle Sturdivant	788	874	47.4%	-0.246	111.356	111.638	49.6%42	37.0%74	17.6%42	33.1%58	49.7%54	67.8%44	14.2%30	32.3%38
Tafara Gapare	666	996	40.1%	-2.842	106.244	109.044	50.2%46	33.0%58	19.2%30	29.8%50	47.9%62	68.7%48	12.5%20	31.5%42
Ty Claude	655	1,007	39.4%	-4.540	109.852	114.330	50.9%48	36.3%72	18.5%36	29.6%50	50.1%50	67.9%46	11.6%18	27.9%52
Dallan Coleman	542	1,120	32.6%	5.456	117.070	111.636	51.0%48	39.7%82	15.1%60	32.0%56	50.1%50	66.3%38	15.7%42	27.6%54
Ibrahima Sacko	239	1,422	14.4%	-2.942	98.226	101.164	42.6%16	34.8%66	16.3%50	23.0%30	41.8%84	64.4%32	15.2%38	37.9%26
Ebenezer Dowuona	230	1,432	13.8%	-19.818	102.836	122.616	47.0%32	32.1%56	15.7%56	16.8%14	51.8%42	61.6%22	11.3%16	27.8%54
Carter Murphy	124	1,538	7.4%	-16.222	112.358	128.610	49.6%42	38.8%80	15.4%58	25.6%38	54.6%30	60.3%18	12.7%22	33.3%34
Amaree Abram	121	1,540	7.3%	-21.418	101.332	122.716	44.4%22	43.0%90	22.2%16	42.1%78	54.2%32	63.8%28	13.4%26	30.5%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Miles Kelly	1,369	293	82.4%	-6.936	109.350	116.228	47.9%36	36.8%74	17.1%46	33.6%60	47.6%62	64.8%32	9.9%10	25.3%60
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	1,357	305	81.7%	-2.142	111.054	113.134	51.9%54	36.3%72	19.7%28	29.1%48	51.3%46	68.7%48	14.1%30	28.2%52
Naithan George	1,149	512	69.2%	-2.142	110.152	112.236	48.8%40	40.4%84	19.3%30	33.7%60	50.5%48	66.2%38	14.5%32	32.9%38
Baye Ndongo	1,069	593	64.3%	-0.346	111.858	112.136	49.3%40	37.1%74	15.7%56	29.9%50	47.7%62	63.7%28	13.5%26	32.5%38
Kyle Sturdivant	788	874	47.4%	-9.132	103.938	113.034	48.9%40	32.5%58	17.2%44	23.2%30	49.8%54	68.1%46	12.7%22	29.0%48
Tafara Gapare	666	996	40.1%	-6.336	108.248	114.630	48.7%38	35.8%70	16.2%52	26.6%40	51.0%46	67.4%44	14.0%30	29.8%46
Ty Claude	655	1,007	39.4%	-5.138	105.942	111.038	48.2%36	33.7%64	16.7%48	26.7%40	49.5%54	68.0%46	14.6%34	32.4%38
Dallan Coleman	542	1,120	32.6%	-9.830	102.836	112.634	48.4%38	32.1%56	18.5%36	25.7%38	49.6%54	68.7%48	12.3%20	31.9%40
Ibrahima Sacko	239	1,422	14.4%	-5.238	109.050	114.132	50.5%48	34.7%66	17.6%42	28.7%46	51.1%46	68.7%48	13.1%24	29.3%48
Ebenezer Dowuona	230	1,432	13.8%	-2.542	108.248	110.740	49.7%42	35.1%68	17.7%42	29.7%50	49.4%54	69.0%50	13.7%28	31.0%42
Carter Murphy	124	1,538	7.4%	-4.040	107.046	111.038	49.2%40	34.3%64	17.6%42	28.0%44	49.3%54	68.6%48	13.4%26	30.3%44
Amaree Abram	121	1,540	7.3%	-3.540	107.948	111.438	49.6%42	34.0%64	17.0%46	26.7%40	49.4%54	68.3%48	13.4%26	30.5%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Georgia TechGa. Tech14-18

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Georgia Tech14-18